test May 2010

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

137 participants
295 discussions

Fedora install support for netbooks -- small screen size
by Robert Moskowitz 12 Jan '11

12 Jan '11

I am doing another FC12 install on my ASUS 701ee. This is a test system, and I end up installing every month or so. Of course with the small screen size, I end up pressing <cntl-N> a lot, as I cannot see the Next button. And on some screens I just miss some options, like getting to customize the install packages. I am always forgetting the key combo to turn that check box on. Is there some way to either get the ability to pan the screen around or scroll the screen so that on Netbooks that SHOULD be a popular install platform for Fedora, can have workable installation?

18 43

[Fedora QA] #72: Proposal for reducing test permutations
by fedora-badges 28 Jul '10

28 Jul '10

#72: Proposal for reducing test permutations -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Test Review | Version: Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- = problem = So far we have similar test cases for a same test area, and it's not quite useful to test all of them. = analysis = Take RAID cases for example, as James said:"We aren't hitting any problems anymore that are specific to RAID0 but work on RAID5. The main focus for this tests is to make sure that we identify a real-world RAID install partitioning setup, anaconda can execute that partition scheme, and dracut can boot it." = enhancement recommendation = I would like to propose for removing the following cases and keeping a representative one instead: RAID: * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/PartitioningRootfsOnRaid1 QA/TestCases/PartitioningRootfsOnRaid1] * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/PartitioningRaid0OnLvmDevice QA/TestCases/PartitioningRaid0OnLvmDevice] * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/PartitioningUsrOnRaid0 QA/TestCases/PartitioningUsrOnRaid0] * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/PartitioningUsrOnRaid5 QA/TestCases/PartitioningUsrOnRaid5] * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/PartitioningUsrOnRaid6 QA/TestCases/PartitioningUsrOnRaid6] (Replace them with this case: [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Install_to_Hardware_RAID QA:Testcase_Install_to_Hardware_RAID]) [[BR]] Preupgrade: * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Preupgrade_from_older_release QA:Testcase_Preupgrade_from_older_release] [[BR]] FTP Install: * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceFtpAnonymous QA/TestCases/InstallSourceFtpAnonymous] (keep the [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceFtpNonAnonymous NonAnonymous case]) [[BR]] If you have any thought about it, please feel free to tell, thanks. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/72> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 12

[Fedora QA] #63: RFE - i18n install verification
by fedora-badges 15 Jul '10

15 Jul '10

#63: RFE - i18n install verification -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jlaska | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Test Review | Version: Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- This ticket is intended to track the post-Fedora 13 addition of several i18n test cases to the [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_13_Install_Test_Plan installation test plan]. Adam, Hurry and myself discussed several different i18n use cases to target, including: {{{ > On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 22:47 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Non-English European language - French or German, maybe > Asian language - C, J or K :) > Cyrillic language - Russian is fine > Arabic > Something else as a wildcard, maybe something African }}} For Fedora 13, a small change as been made to [http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_%28encrypted%29… QA:Testcase Anaconda autopart (encrypted) install] to install with a non- English keymap using characters that don't exist on an english keymap. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/63> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 5

[Fedora QA] #66: Request for mentor to join as proven tester
by fedora-badges 13 Jul '10

13 Jul '10

#66: Request for mentor to join as proven tester -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: sundaram | Owner: Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- As described in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/JoinProvenTesters:Draft, I am requesting a mentor to guide me. I would like to participate in the QA efforts as a proven tester -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/66> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 4

[Fedora QA] #73: Unify the cases of one Text Area to the same style
by fedora-badges 09 Jul '10

09 Jul '10

#73: Unify the cases of one Text Area to the same style -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- = problem = So far the test cases from one Test Area have different styles in steps description, such as the following two install source ones: * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceHttp QA/TestCases/InstallSourceHttp] * [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/InstallSourceNfs QA/TestCases/InstallSourceNfs] = analysis = The above cases should have similar steps but actually are described in a different way(The steps are different). = enhancement recommendation = Therefore, My suggestion is to modify such cases so that they have similar steps for testers to follow and highlight the difference between each other. What do you think? Feel free to tell me. Thank you! -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/73> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 2

[Fedora QA] #69: Proventester mentor request
by fedora-badges 07 Jul '10

07 Jul '10

#69: Proventester mentor request -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: mcloaked | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- I am requesting a mentor to guide me in order to become a proventester for Fedora QA As described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/JoinProvenTesters:Draft, I need a mentor to guide me. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/69> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 4

[Fedora QA] #64: Mentor request for proventesters
by fedora-badges 07 Jul '10

07 Jul '10

#64: Mentor request for proventesters ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: schaiba | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Trac | Version: Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/64> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 4

[Fedora QA] #67: Request for Mentor
by fedora-badges 07 Jul '10

07 Jul '10

#67: Request for Mentor -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: kparnell | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- As described in: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/JoinProvenTesters:Draft I am requesting a mentor to guide me. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/67> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 6

[Fedora QA] #70: proventesters request - tomspur
by fedora-badges 06 Jul '10

06 Jul '10

#70: proventesters request - tomspur -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: tomspur | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- = Full Name = [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tomspur Thomas Spura] = Experience = * Currently, I maintain 18 packages in fedora [1], also quite important ones like python3 and ipython. I'm also provenpackager, so I know how to break things from a packager view of point ;) * I've already given much feedback in bodi (I'm most of the time in the top 8 in [2]). - prevented a broken evolution package getting in: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/evolution-2.30.1-3.fc13 - my karma would make 'proxy karma' unnecessary, e.g.: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.13.0-1.fc13 * Most of the time, I'm running XFCE (and just sometimes GNOME) and because most other QA members are constantly running GNOME, the XFCE packages are unlikely to get tested. So I would primary focus on testing XFCE packages. Further links can be found at [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Tomspur my usersite]. [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/tomspur [2] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/metrics/?release=F13 = Summary = I believe, I've already shown some of the capabilities, that are needed to get proventester, know how updates are working and know how to break something as a packager and therefore what to check as a QA member... So I don't need much guidence to finish the proventesters process and here I'm requesting a mentor. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/70> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 6

[Fedora QA] #71: Proventester request
by fedora-badges 06 Jul '10

06 Jul '10

#71: Proventester request -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: kevin | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- I've been working with Fedora for a while and would like to be a proventester so I could help test Xfce and other updates in the critical path. Happy to work with a mentor or whatever. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/71> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 7

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test May 2010