test June 2011

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

88 participants
216 discussions

[Fedora QA] #201: Create test case for 'existing Linux partitions' install method
by fedora-badges 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

#201: Create test case for 'existing Linux partitions' install method ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: adamwill | Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16 Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- As per #151, we are missing a test for the 'existing Linux partitions' installation method, which is required to work at Alpha stage per criterion "The installer must be able to complete an installation using the entire disk, existing free space, or existing Linux partitions methods, with or without encryption enabled". A new test should be created and added to the installation matrix, along the lines of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_install and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_autopart_%28use_free_sp… . Assigning to rhe as our installation test wizard :) -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/201> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 4

[Fedora QA] #208: Update ks=file:/ks.cfg test to provide correct instructions for use with LZMA
by fedora-badges 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

#208: Update ks=file:/ks.cfg test to provide correct instructions for use with LZMA ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16 Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: 15 retrospective | ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Due to a late lorax change, the initrd.img is no longer a gzip compressed CPIO ball. Instead it is now a LZMA compressed CPIO ball. [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/KickstartKsFilePathKsCfg ks=file:/ks.cfg] need to be updated accordingly. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/208> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 3

[Fedora QA] #210: Add test for VNC with vncpassword= and vncconnect= options
by fedora-badges 26 Jul '11

26 Jul '11

#210: Add test for VNC with vncpassword= and vncconnect= options ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16 Component: Wiki | Version: Keywords: 15 retrospective | ------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- No explicit testing for VNC password or vncconnect was performed and an issue was encountered related to vncpasswd not working [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=678150 bug#678150]. Take this ticket for now, feel free to retake if you have interest. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/210> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 4

Pre-Beta Acceptance Test Plan
by Tao Wu 20 Jul '11

20 Jul '11

Greetings folks, Just wanted to summarize how testing held up for the pre-beta acceptance test run of Fedora 15. Thanks for your attention. It is a good news that the pre-RC installation version has passed the major test, which is used to identify any major test blockers prior to the Test Compose (TC).Let's expect the exciting coming out of F15-TC1 next week! If you have spare time and want to contribute by verify this version, the test cases and results can be found on the following URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_15_Pre-RC_Acceptance_Tes… Thanks a lot! Good Luck, Tao Wu

2 5

[Fedora QA] #211: Request to Join the Proven testers club
by fedora-badges 13 Jul '11

13 Jul '11

#211: Request to Join the Proven testers club -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: seena321 | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Proventester Mentor Request | Version: Keywords: | -----------------------------------------+---------------------------------- = phenomenon = = reason = = recommendation = -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/211> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 2

[Fedora QA] #207: Reveiw Security Lab spin validation matrix
by fedora-badges 12 Jul '11

12 Jul '11

#207: Reveiw Security Lab spin validation matrix -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: athmane | Owner: athmane Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 16 Component: Test Review | Version: Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Someone could review the following validation matrix for Fedora Security Lab, I'll sync it with the current desktop validation matrix (F16) if there's new changes. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Athmane/Draft_Security_Lab_validation_m… -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/207> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

3 6

New BugZapper Introduction
by Pete Wojtaszek 11 Jul '11

11 Jul '11

Hello ladies and gentlemen, My name is Pete aka wojox. I'm a thirty-nine year old systems administrator from San Antonio, Tx. I have been involved in Linux for quite a few years. Mainly on the Debian side of things. I'm familiar with YUM and RPM as well. I've reported a fair amount of bugs in Ubuntu, but never triaged. I would be looking for some form of mentorship if someone would have me. Thank you for your support. Pete Wojtaszek wojox wojox AT irc.freenode.net

2 1

proposal: 'base' validation matrix
by Adam Williamson 08 Jul '11

08 Jul '11

Hey, folks. So, right now, as most of you know, we have two release validation 'matrices' - sets of tests we run and document on each candidate build of Fedora to check compliance with the release criteria. A few of us have been working in ticket #151 - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/151 - to ensure the tests are in line with the criteria, particularly that we have tests to cover each criterion, and we've introduced a few new tests to cover criteria that weren't previously covered. Some of these don't really fit easily into the category of 'installation' tests or 'desktop' tests, so I'm proposing we introduce a new, third matrix, which I'm currently thinking of as 'base'. There have already been three tests written in this proposed new category: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_base_firstboot https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_base_startup https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_base_system_logging there will likely be more as we go through the Beta and Final criteria. I've thrown up a quick draft of how the matrix might look here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_base_validation_matrix Just wanted to make sure the group knows about this week, and ask for feedback on the test cases, the matrix and the overall plan here - do you agree a third matrix is the best way to organize things? Any ideas for naming, etc? Any comments on the test cases written so far? Thanks! (also thanks to Athmane Madjouj and Rui He for helping out with this work.) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net

2 5

Clock Issues in Rawhide
by Clyde E. Kunkel 07 Jul '11

07 Jul '11

Recently, the time in the gnome status bar has been incrementing by UTC offset for my locale. I reset it using date time settings but it wasn't holding. Then I noticed: systemd[1]: Cannot add dependency job for unit hwclock-load.service, ignoring: Unit hwclock-load.service failed to load: No such file or directory. See system logs and 'systemctl status' for details. And indeed the service was missing from /lib/systemd/system. yum whatprovides didn't show anything, so I copied the missing services (also ...save.service) from a F15 installation and that fixed the problem. What I don't know is who/what is responsible for providing the hwclock-load.service files in /lib/systemd/system. systemd-units? If anyone can help with this, I will do some more testing and, if indicated, create a bz. TIA -- Regards, OldFart

2 7

Release criteria updates: genericizing!
by James Laska 06 Jul '11

06 Jul '11

Greetings testers, I've been playing with some ideas on how to allow secondary architectures to leverage the primary release criteria. I have some ideas/challenges that I'll send to the list for feedback later. However, in preparation for those ideas/concerns, I'd like to propose several changes to the release criteria. The proposed changes are intended to make the existing criteria slightly more generic, without losing their meaning. Additionally, I've made a few other minor changes and added a few questions. Please take a few minutes to review the proposed changes (highlighted in red at the links below). If nothing alarming surfaces during review, I'll proceed with operation genericize [1] early next week. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jlaska/Draft_Alpha_criteria_revision https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jlaska/Draft_Beta_criteria_revision https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jlaska/Draft_Final_criteria_revision Thanks, James [1] Kudos to Adam for coining this gem!

4 12

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
22
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test June 2011