test January 2012

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

50 participants
207 discussions

New criterion for updates.img using
by Petr Schindler 03 Apr '12

03 Apr '12

I propose new beta criterion: "The installer must be able to use updates.img obtained by any supported way" I think, that this should be at criteria too. There are test cases which uses this feature - [1], [2] [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_updates.img_via_install… [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_updates.img_via_local_m…

3 8

GNOME shell broken after suspend and resume for driver r300_dri
by Christoph Frieben 01 Apr '12

01 Apr '12

Can anybody report success for the suspend and resume cycle triggered from within the GNOME shell when the graphics card is based on some R300/R400 variant? In my case, the shell is still broken after resume. The video device is some ATI Radeon X800 card which is using the R420 chip. Only a black desktop, a mouse pointer and the GNOME panel are visible after resume. The desktop is not completely frozen since I am still able to move the mouse pointer. It is also possible to switch to a VT in order to reboot the system. Thanks, ~C PS: The F15 development cycle is nearing completion, and in my opinion, this is a major usability issue.

3 7

[Fedora QA] #270: Proposed Test Day - Sugar Desktop
by fedora-badges 28 Mar '12

28 Mar '12

#270: Proposed Test Day - Sugar Desktop -----------------------+------------------------ Reporter: greenfeld | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 17 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------+------------------------ The Sugar (www.sugarlabs.org) desktop is being ported to GTK3. Early versions of this code already are in Rawhide, and the final version is expected to land in Fedora 17. We therefore think it would be a good idea to schedule a test day for Sugar and the SoaS Fedora Spin during the Fedora 17 time frame. March 22 is probably best, although other open test days in March will work as well. For reference, the schedule for Sugar 0.95/0.96 may be found at http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/0.96/Roadmap -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/270> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 2

Installation from USB-written images (3/5): Live.iso + LiveCD-tools
by Josef Skladanka 26 Mar '12

26 Mar '12

This testcase [1] should ensure, that if the user uses LiveCD tools to transfer the Fedora Live.iso to USB stick, the boot process works 'as expected'. I propose this as a Alpha verification testcase. --------------------------- = Description = This test verifies that Fedora Live Image can be booted from USB stick. There are more methods to create the Live USB stick, this test covers Livecd-tools. == Setup == * Prepare the Live ISO image and USB stick. * Copy the Live.iso to the USB stick using LiveCD tools [2] == How to test == * Insert the USB stick containing Live.iso, and boot the system under test * At the boot prompt, interrupt the automatic boot sequence by pressing any key. Then select the menu option Boot. == Expected Results == * A graphical boot menu is displayed and the graphics look reasonably good. While hi-res images aren't supported in the boot menu, the graphics should not look extremely pixelated. * Upon selecting Boot, the Live image boots successfully. --------------------------- [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jskladan/Draft_QA_Testcase_USB_stick_Li… [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_and_use_Live_USB#Check_livecd-t… -- test mailing list test(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

2 2

New testcase for installation without selinux
by Petr Schindler 27 Feb '12

27 Feb '12

I propose new test case [1]. This test case is related to final criterion: "The installed system must run normally if the user chooses to install without SELinux" There is no test case for this now. I have one note on this. There is used noselinux option, but it doesn't work now. I filled bug [2] there is another option with the same effect - selinux=0 and this one works fine, but Anaconda have noselinux in documentation, so it should work and they're working on it. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pschindl/Draft_QA_Testcase_Install_with… [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784828

4 7

New test case for testing if services start properly
by Petr Schindler 20 Feb '12

20 Feb '12

I propose new test cases [1]. This test case is related to final criterion: "All services in a default install must start properly" We don't have test case for this right now. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pschindl/Draft_QA_Testcase_Services_sta…

3 4

New criterion for reporting failure of installer and accessing debug mode
by Petr Schindler 20 Feb '12

20 Feb '12

I propose final criterion: "The installer must be able to handle the failure and report the issue. The installer must be also able to access debug mode." We have test case for this - [1]. It's useful to have this feature. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_traceback_debug_mode

3 5

New criterion for Checksum
by Petr Schindler 20 Feb '12

20 Feb '12

I propose new final criterion: "There must be published correct checksum for each ISO media. Also if there is embedded checksum on ISO media, it must be correct." I think we should check this. We have already test case [1]. I propose to change release level for this test case to final. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_ISO_Checksums

5 13

New criterion for updates.img via URL
by Petr Schindler 20 Feb '12

20 Feb '12

I propose new alpha criterion: "The installer must be able to download and apply updates.img file using a HTTP url and use it" We have test cases for this [1], but no criterion. I think it's pretty importing -> alpha. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_updates.img_via_URL

2 4

New testcases proposal - Installation from USB-written images (0/5)
by Josef Skladanka 16 Feb '12

16 Feb '12

Hello, as per [1] and [2], I'd like to propose five new testcases, which focus on testing the ability to boot/install Fedora using USB stick as the installation/boot medium. Even though, there is no Release Criterion specifying the supported installation media, the [2] mentions 'Common Boot media / Common Installation sources' (Alpha verifiacation) and 'All Boot media / All Installation sources'. These IMHO support the need for new USB-centric testcases. Please be informed, that these proposals based on the already existing testcases, and I will be really happy to change/update these according to your input. Regards Joza [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/260 [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Fedora_17_Install_Test_Plan#Test_Priority

1 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
21
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test January 2012