test July 2014

test@lists.fedoraproject.org

67 participants
252 discussions

Testcase Review
by Mike Ruckman 15 Aug '14

15 Aug '14

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings Testers! I've been working on some testcases and general wiki work for the Cloud SIG [0]. While I was doing this I created a few testcases and edited a couple of our others. I'd like to these get reviewed and placed on the matrices. Below is a list of what I've done so far: * Desktop Updates Split out the command line bits into their own testcase. Edited version: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Roshi/QA/Testcase_Desktop_updates New CLI updates testcase: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Roshi/QA/Testcase_CLI_updates * Package installation We didn't already have testcases for package installation (it was implied in a bunch of other places though), so I created them. New Testcases: CLI: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_CLI_package_installation GUI: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_GUI_package_installation * Base system logging I added some bits to include cloud images. Edited Testcase: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Roshi/QA/Testcase_base_system_logging On a related note, with the new package installation testcases, it occurred to me we don't have a "Package installation" release criteria. Again this is implied through other criteria - but should we have an explicit criteria regarding package installation? I don't know it would *add* anything to our matrices, but I also don't see it detracting from the status quo. Regardless of the potential new criteria, if you could review these testcases, that would be great! Thanks! // Mike [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Roshi/QA/Cloud_Docs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTyAfiAAoJEHRQmEj93tMJUHgH/1bnC5UVID7RLoMoAEXebsBZ JQfs+iQkdh6+zEXu6wACL+tQnWdYl7VaU9rh3CK9Rgk0LLMeVwBFdkd9OfK5h/un z0hn6FLwEtn5wQGastMmpphaymtMmsFeXOnpA84lfl6g8rfqaEFPcRuKfIez3JAq Isp+XH0IsPV1m/fjyVnO/W0mQiPiCqqoLen6z1K0Kxibg4U2PYtICdj1lUbm9sIY YxVZ52MRmhssKmW/DHfJMoiWvqi4dSvTV7BJtN096QNecMlyK6rAKj6lvLLBgwVL nUtTrtWj4XdNbLseioW8vfbRdQpsN/LOLXG2A7cn9VHcIFshRdT2MGzRUIeSJdg= =jslO -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

2 3

[Fedora QA] #430: Printing Test Day
by fedora-badges 11 Aug '14

11 Aug '14

#430: Printing Test Day ----------------------+------------------------ Reporter: twaugh | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------+------------------------ = phenomenon = I would like to arrange a Printing Test Day for Fedora 20. Proposed date is 5th November 2013. = background analysis = Fedora 20 comes with CUPS 1.7 and Ghostscript 9.10, as well as some changes to the cups-filters package. = implementation recommendation = The main focus will be regression testing. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/430> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 2

[Fedora QA] #424: Proposed Test Day - KDE 4.11
by fedora-badges 11 Aug '14

11 Aug '14

#424: Proposed Test Day - KDE 4.11 ----------------------+------------------------ Reporter: mbriza | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------+------------------------ = phenomenon = KDE Plasma Workspaces test day for Fedora 20 Proposed date is 7th November, 2013. = implementation recommendation = We, as the KDE SIG need to test our three proposed features: * KDE Plasma Workspaces 4.11 * Plasma-nm * SDDM as the default KDE display manager instead of KDM as well as the regular KDE tests ran before every Fedora release -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/424> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 3

[Fedora QA] #420: Power management testday
by fedora-badges 11 Aug '14

11 Aug '14

#420: Power management testday ----------------------+------------------------ Reporter: jskarvad | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------+------------------------ We would like to run Power management test day. The arrangement will be similar to our previous Power management test days. We can prepare the live medium ourselves. We propose 2013-11-14, but any other date should fit. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/420> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 3

[Fedora QA] #409: Fedora 20 i18n Test Day
by fedora-badges 11 Aug '14

11 Aug '14

#409: Fedora 20 i18n Test Day ----------------------+------------------------ Reporter: aalam | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------+------------------------ I18N (Internationalization) Test Day Test Date: TBD Fedora 20 Schedule: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule Required: Live ISO, it may not be same as l10n test day. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/409> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 10

[Fedora QA] #408: Fedora 20 Translation Test Day
by fedora-badges 11 Aug '14

11 Aug '14

#408: Fedora 20 Translation Test Day ----------------------+------------------------ Reporter: aalam | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20 Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------+------------------------ = phenomenon = Translation Test day for Fedora 20. Test Date: need to decide. It is before 'Software Translation Freeze' (2013-10-08). proposed date: Thursday Sep 26 (2013-09-26) = implementation recommendation = - need to review test cases for gnome-3.10 - need to create test for Anaconda fltg team will help for that. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/408> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 9

[Fedora QA] #407: Bluetooth Test Day
by fedora-badges 11 Aug '14

11 Aug '14

#407: Bluetooth Test Day ----------------------+------------------ Reporter: martix | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Test Day | Version: Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------+------------------ I'd like to do Bluetooh Test Day on 2013-10-17 Change: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bluez5 -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/407> Fedora QA <http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa> Fedora Quality Assurance

1 6

Fedora21 lpr prints blank pages
by Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX 04 Aug '14

04 Aug '14

The F21 lp and lpr commands print blank pages. The CUPS test page printed normally, as did a print from GIMP. -- Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX caf(a)omen.com www.omen.com Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software" 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 503-614-0430

2 7

Pcmanfm, aisleriot strangeness
by Steven Usdansky 31 Jul '14

31 Jul '14

Running a fully updated F21 branch with LXDE desktop; I see the same behavior when running sol and pcmanfm. In both cases, clicking on the titlebar does nothing; I can't click and drag the window, and the minimize, maximize, and close buttons don't respond. However, if I click on the menubar, the window becomes active; clicking in the empty part of the menubar, I can do a click and drag. The windows look like gtk2 windows, but appear to be behaving like gtk3 windows. Bug or feature? ~$ rpm -q --requires aisleriot | uniq | sort > a1 ~$ rpm -q --requires pcmanfm | uniq | sort > a2 ~$ comm -1 -2 a1 a2 /bin/sh libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libcairo-gobject.so.2()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.14)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 rtld(GNU_HASH)

1 0

Fedora-Minimal-armhfp-21-20140730-sda.raw.xz on Cubieboard 2 - problems
by Robert Moskowitz 31 Jul '14

31 Jul '14

It took me a bit to work out issues with the serial console to get back into testing. Those issues are for a separate list... I can get Minimal to go through the install process and set timezone, root password, and userid. When I go to log in I get: Fedora release 21 (Twenty One) Kernel 3.16.0-0.rc7.git1.1.fc21.armv7hl on an armv7l (ttyS0) localhost login: root Password: [ 64.141895] cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain [ 66.257749] eth0: device MAC address c2:f5:e1:51:08:dd [ 66.450111] No MAC Management Counters available [ 66.712730] No MAC Management Counters available [ 66.718353] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready [ 68.632241] stmmaceth 1c50000.ethernet eth0: Link is Up - 100Mbps/Full - flow control off [ 68.649252] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready Last login: Wed Dec 31 19:04:26 on ttyS0 [root@localhost ~]# ifconfig -bash: ifconfig: command not found [root@localhost ~]# echo $PATH /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/root/bin [root@localhost ~]# No commands work. I know the IP address this device gets assigned so I tried pinging and ssh: ]# ping 208.87.63.186 PING 208.87.63.186 (208.87.63.186) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 208.87.63.186: icmp_seq=1 ttl=47 time=78.8 ms 64 bytes from 208.87.63.186: icmp_seq=2 ttl=47 time=77.1 ms ^C --- 208.87.63.186 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 received, 0% packet loss, time 1001ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 77.167/78.009/78.852/0.887 ms # ssh 208.87.63.186 -l root ssh: connect to host 208.87.63.186 port 22: Connection refused You can probably ping it yourself, but port 22 is blocked at the firewall router. I powered off and rebooted, and still the same behaviour. I did a screen capture of the install, so can provide that if it would help (54K). Note I have had this problem since I started on Minimal with the 20140724 build, but have not been able to stablily test it. I believe my setup now provides a reliable test of the build on a Cubieboard 2. Further note that I have a F19 and F20 remix working on this system on other SD cards. I can boot any of the versions just by switching which card is in it. Thank you and I await advise on what to provide next (or a build that works for me).

2 4

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
26
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

test July 2014