Some such as I are used to thinking of NFS in terms of shares. That's how we export them. That's how we mount them.
So when the installer asks for a server name, I naturally enter 192.168.1.13:/x because that is what I export. And naturally I enter /fc9/os which is relative to the share in question.
It should be made clear that the NFS install uses syntax one would associate with ftp, not NFS. Perferably with a hint, but at least a clear example in the documentation.
While we're at it, the install from URL should come with a list of URLs to download from as does FreeBSD et al..
Once upon a time, Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R caf@omen.com said:
Some such as I are used to thinking of NFS in terms of shares. That's how we export them. That's how we mount them.
So when the installer asks for a server name, I naturally enter 192.168.1.13:/x because that is what I export. And naturally I enter /fc9/os which is relative to the share in question.
It should be made clear that the NFS install uses syntax one would associate with ftp, not NFS. Perferably with a hint, but at least a clear example in the documentation.
Calling it "server name" and "path" is a pretty clear hint. I don't call my server "disk:/data/mirror", I call it "disk". Also, the installer doesn't use an arbitrary division in the path that you are creating; it mounts /x/fc9/os (NFS exports allow you to mount subdirectories of the export). The installer doesn't need to know or care that you export /x and fc9/os is a subdirectory.
When you specify an NFS install on the boot command line or in a kickstart, it is just server:/path/to/tree.