Non-sse2 won't work on openSUSE Tumbleweed, but does on Debian next (10/Buster). I have a 28 attempting to dnf upgrade to 29, but I'm seeing a ton of entries filling up /var/lib/systemd/coredump, 197 files and still counting. :-(
On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 22:50 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
Non-sse2
what is your non-sse2 [1] ? Pentium 3 (Produced from early 1999 to 2003) ? or pentium 2 ?
In July of 2016 , we talked about enable or disable sse2 capabalities on i686 for x264 [2] On Tuesday, 26 July kwizart test it on KVM guest with pentium 2 cpu emulated , you may read in thread in Pentium 3 code works an in pentium 2 code doesn't work but also doesn't crash
I vote in enable sse2 , and not support Pentium 2 or 3 , why not but an non-sse2 kernel in a copr repo for example ? .
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SSE2
[2] https://lists.rpmfusion.org/archives/list/rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusi...
won't work on openSUSE Tumbleweed, but does on Debian next (10/Buster). I have a 28 attempting to dnf upgrade to 29, but I'm seeing a ton of entries filling up /var/lib/systemd/coredump, 197 files and still counting. :-( -- "Wisdom is supreme; therefore get wisdom. Whatever else you get, get wisdom." Proverbs 4:7 (New Living Translation)
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelin es List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lis ts.fedoraproject.org
Sérgio Basto composed on 2018-09-20 04:39 (UTC+0100):
On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 22:50 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
Non-sse2
what is your non-sse2 [1] ? Pentium 3 (Produced from early 1999 to 2003) ? or pentium 2 ?
In July of 2016 , we talked about enable or disable sse2 capabalities on i686 for x264 [2] On Tuesday, 26 July kwizart test it on KVM guest with pentium 2 cpu emulated , you may read in thread in Pentium 3 code works an in pentium 2 code doesn't work but also doesn't crash
I vote in enable sse2 , and not support Pentium 2 or 3 , why not but an non-sse2 kernel in a copr repo for example ? .
processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 8 model name : AMD Sempron(tm) 2800+ stepping : 1 cpu MHz : 1996.334 cache size : 256 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mp mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up bogomips : 3992.66 clflush size : 32 cache_alignment : 32 address sizes : 34 bits physical, 32 bits virtual power management: ts
PC hard locked up after just past halfway done, so I gave up trying.
On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 23:51 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
Sérgio Basto composed on 2018-09-20 04:39 (UTC+0100):
On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 22:50 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
Non-sse2
what is your non-sse2 [1] ? Pentium 3 (Produced from early 1999 to 2003) ? or pentium 2 ? In July of 2016 , we talked about enable or disable sse2 capabalities on i686 for x264 [2] On Tuesday, 26 July kwizart test it on KVM guest with pentium 2 cpu emulated , you may read in thread in Pentium 3 code works an in pentium 2 code doesn't work but also doesn't crash I vote in enable sse2 , and not support Pentium 2 or 3 , why not but an non-sse2 kernel in a copr repo for example ? .
processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 8 model name : AMD Sempron(tm) 2800+ stepping : 1 cpu MHz : 1996.334 cache size : 256 KB fdiv_bug : no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug : no coma_bug : no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mp mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up bogomips : 3992.66 clflush size : 32 cache_alignment : 32 address sizes : 34 bits physical, 32 bits virtual power management: ts
PC hard locked up after just past halfway done, so I gave up trying.
yeah , you may have one of last cpu that not support SSE2 [1], it was released on about August/September of 2004 . Now IMO, enable SSE2 is correct, because the big majority of i686 computers (now a days) have SSE2 and they benefit a lot with it, on other hand your computer is not on default , so you may build an non- default kernel disabling SSE2 .
Best regards
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_Sempron_microprocessors#%22Thorton...)
-- "Wisdom is supreme; therefore get wisdom. Whatever else you get, get wisdom." Proverbs 4:7 (New Living Translation)
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ _______________________________________________ test mailing list -- test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelin es List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test@lis ts.fedoraproject.org
Felix Miata wrote:
Non-sse2 won't work on openSUSE Tumbleweed, but does on Debian next (10/Buster). I have a 28 attempting to dnf upgrade to 29, but I'm seeing a ton of entries filling up /var/lib/systemd/coredump, 197 files and still counting. :-( --
Pretty much yes,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Update_i686_architectural_baseline_to...
-- Rex
-
Felix Miata -
Rex Dieter -
Sérgio Basto