On 4/5/19 4:00 PM, Stephen Perkins wrote:
+1 (or more)
/* begin rant:
I seldom post to the list, but I read each and every post everyday. IMHO the signal is buried by the noise.
I have used RedHat since 1998, ver. 5.2, switched to Fedora in 2003, and been here ever since. I run Fedora 29, both X86_64 and i686 on a workstation (X86_64) and a netbook (i686), the former with the Cinnamon DE, the latter Xfce. Each time I upgrade or do a clean install, Fedora just works.
I fail to understand why posters choose to trash RHEL on this list. I don't run RHEL, I run Fedora. The only current information I have about RHEL is that it was good enough to entice IBM to buy it. I thank Red Hat for supporting Fedora and it concerns me that many people use this list to downgrade RHEL.
To all of you developers that work for Red Hat and also maintain Fedora: Kudos! Red Hat has sponsored and you have produced a very good, very kool OS!
/* end rant
Good night from the rural mountains of Western Maine, USA. Peace be with you.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 6:14 PM Todd Zullinger tmz@pobox.com wrote:
Hi,
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Okay one last slam at RHEL:
Yes, please and thank you, let that be the last one. :)
It's really not appropriate for this forum. We're here to talk about Fedora, not gripe about any other distributions.
Thanks,
-- Todd
Hi Todd,
As I told Steven:
"If you look at the original posting, you will understand. A vendor is giving me a bad time about running an "unstable" OS and tells me I should be running RHEL or clones instead. So the comparison needed to be made."
So it is appropriate. That I am passionate about the issue and gave RHEL a whack over the head a little too many times, you have would have a point.
-Todd