On 03/28/2014 09:47 AM, Bill Davidsen issued this missive:
Joe Zeff wrote:
On 03/25/2014 12:10 PM, Powell, Michael wrote:
I disagree; if a user is presented with the following filesystem choices, btrfs, ext2, ext3, ext4, JFS, reiser4, reiserFS, and ZFS, and each is presented equally with a single paragraph describing its benefits, unless the user has prior knowledge about what is the best choice for the intended installation goal, they're most likely going to spend a great deal of time reading each paragraph. If you simplify the choices to 4 instead of 8, the user has less paragraphs to read and can make a decision faster.
Agreed. However, it might be a good compromise to list only the most common selections, with a button marked Advanced Options (There's probably a better label, but if so, I can't think of it right now.) containing the rest. Beginners will, most likely, avoid that, but those who need/want the more specialized file systems will still have access to them.
This is absolutely just what is needed. Any hope it could get into fc21? If I could pick three things for some future release, they would be:
- better install for controlling allocation of storage by device (but keep the serial number visible!!)
- install without using network, even if available (because slow nets and/or per-byte charges prohibit upgrade to
current)
- a more minimal "minimal install" would be nice.
Anyway, having access to full control, somewhere easy to find, would probably solve many complaints. Thanks for listening.
This really needs to be aimed at the fedora-test list, since that's where the development stuff is going on. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigital ricks@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2 ICQ: 22643734 Yahoo: origrps2 - - - - Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the - - reader...who doesn't get it. - ----------------------------------------------------------------------