389-users March 2006

389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

55 participants
89 discussions

[Fedora-directory-users] Running admin console from a remote machine
by Rajkumar S 20 Mar '06

20 Mar '06

Hi, I have installed fedora-ds on a remote machine for which I do not have access to X Window. I have installed admin console in a local box and can connect to server. From the install doc it seems I need to access from local box atleast once, to change the IP Addresses to Allow from: http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/install/7.1/ch.post.installat… But I do not have a means to connect and do this once, is there any other way ? raj

1 1

[Fedora-directory-users] Reporting errors in a How To
by Mont Rothstein 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

I've been using http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Howto:Samba and I have found a few errors. I can't seem to request an account in the wiki (the new user form is never displayed for me). Does anyone know how else I might report these issues? Thanks, -Mont

2 2

[Fedora-directory-users] PasSync
by Daniel Shackelford 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

Hello all, I moved the Password Sync Service to another server and now I am having some trouble with this: "Failed to load entries from file" in the passync.log file I see connections on our FDS, but I am not seeing passwords change. Any ideas? -- Daniel Shackelford Systems Administrator Technology Services Spring Arbor University 517 750-6648 "For even the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many" Mark 10:45

1 0

[Fedora-directory-users] adding a user to multiple groups
by Susan 16 Mar '06

16 Mar '06

Hi, everybody. I've a group with multiple memberUid attributes: # sysadmin, Groups, example.com dn: cn=sysadmin,ou=Groups,dc=example,dc=com memberUid: 1125 memberUid: 1234 gidNumber: 14 objectClass: top objectClass: posixgroup cn: sysadmin ____ and a user test like this: # test, UNIX, example.com dn: uid=test,ou=UNIX,dc=example,dc=com gidNumber: 1234 objectClass: top objectClass: person objectClass: organizationalPerson objectClass: inetorgperson objectClass: posixAccount objectClass: account host: * givenName: test sn: asdf uidNumber: 1234 uid: test cn: test asdf homeDirectory: /home/test ___ there is also a group "test" which uid test belongs to. Now, test should be a member of both test and sysadmins, correct? However, that doesn't seem to be the case: -bash-3.00$ grep test /etc/passwd -bash-3.00$ id -a test uid=1234(test) gid=1234 groups=1234 -bash-3.00$ id -G test 1234 -bash-3.00$ gid 14 doesn't show up. What am I doing wrong here? Is this not how you add a user to multiple groups?? Thanks.. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

6 12

[Fedora-directory-users] migrate_common.ph on RHEL ES4
by Mont Rothstein 15 Mar '06

15 Mar '06

I am running RHEL ES4 and the FDS/Samba integration HowTo: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Howto:Samba calls for the use of: /usr/share/openldap/migration/migrate_common.ph which does not exist. In fact, /usr/share/openldap exists but is empty. Do I have to install openldap just to get this, or is there somewhere I can download it from? Thanks, -Mont

3 4

[Fedora-directory-users] Trouble Populating FDS with PDC Entry
by Mont Rothstein 15 Mar '06

15 Mar '06

I am trying to follow http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Howto:Sambaand running into trouble. I'm at the "Populating FDS with PDC Entry" section. I get my SID, and create my domainName.ldif file as sepcified (contents below). I then run the command: /opt/fedora-ds/slapd-rheles4rs1/ldif2ldap "cn=Directory manager" myDMPassword /tmp/forayadams.ldif What this gives me is: adding new entry sambaDomainName=forayadams,dc=forayadams,dc=foray,dc=com ldap_add: Already exists I can't find anything on this. None of the log files (admin-serv/logs/access, admin-serv/logs/error, slapd-rheles4rs1/logs/access, slapd-rheles4rs1/logs/errors) show anything when I issue this command. Any ideas as to what I've done wrong? Thanks, -Mont Contents of my /tmp/forayadams.ldif: dn: sambaDomainName=forayadams,dc=forayadams,dc=foray,dc=com objectclass: sambaDomain objectclass: sambaUnixIDPool objectclass: top sambaDomainName: forayadams sambaSID: S-1-5-21-807157010-1821471989-4121009367 uidNumber: 550 gidNumber: 550

3 6

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2
by Bliss, Aaron 15 Mar '06

15 Mar '06

Here is what 00core.ldif looks like (I'm sorry, but this is very foreign to me; does this look okay)? Thanks again. Aaron cat 00core.ldif | more | grep -i passwordMaxrepeats attributeTypes: ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.2081 NAME ( 'passwordMaxRepeats' 'pwdMaxRepeats' ) DESC 'Netscape defined password policy attribute type' SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 SINGLE-VALUE X-ORIGIN 'Netscape Directory Server' ) objectClasses: ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.2.13 NAME 'passwordPolicy' DESC 'Netscape defined password policy objectclass' SUP top MAY ( passwordMaxAge $ passwordExp $ passwordMinLength $ passwordKeepHistory $ passwordInHistory $ passwordChange $ passwordWarning $ passwordLockout $ passwordMaxFailure $ passwordResetDuration $ passwordUnlock $ passwordLockoutDuration $ passwordCheckSyntax $ passwordMustChange $ passwordStorageScheme $ passwordMinAge $ passwordResetFailureCount $ passwordGraceLimit $ passwordMinDigits $ passwordMinAlphas $ passwordMinUppers $ passwordMinLowers $ passwordMinSpecials $ passwordMin8bit $ passwordMaxRepeats $ passwordMinCategories $ passwordMinTokenLength ) X-ORIGIN 'Netscape Directory Server' ) -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard Megginson Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:42 AM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Bliss, Aaron wrote: >Is there any easy way that I can verify that the schemas have been >updated properly? Thanks. > > Yes. See if your slapd-instance/config/schema/00core.ldif file has definitions for these attributes: passwordMinDigits $ passwordMinAlphas $ passwordMinUppers $ passwordMinLowers $ passwordMinSpecials $ passwordMin8bit $ passwordMaxRepeats $ passwordMinCategories $ passwordMinTokenLength >Aaron > >-----Original Message----- >From: Bliss, Aaron >Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 1:34 PM >To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.' >Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >I believe this is what your looking for, here is an example when I >intentionally attempt to break the password rules: >[13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 RESULT err=19 tag=103 >nentries=0 et ime=0 >[13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 MOD >dn="uid=awbtest,ou=users,dc=pre ferredcare,dc=org", invalid password >syntax > >Here is the error that occurred during the upgrade (I wouldn't worry >too much about the entries below that reference fds1 instead of >al-lnx-s11, I manually typed that after pasting the error log, as I >wasn't comfortable displaying the real server name, but it doesn't >really matter now, the real server name is al-lnx-s11) > >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=101 >nentries=1 etime=0 >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=4 BIND dn="uid=admin, >ou=Administrators, ou=TopologyManagement, o=NetscapeRoot" method=128 >version=3 >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=5 SRCH >base="cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare. >org, ou=preferredcare.org, o=NetscapeRoot" scope=2 >filter="(&(objectClass=nsAppl >ication)(nsNickName=slapd)(nsInstalledLocation=/opt/fedora-ds))" >attrs="* aci pa sswordExpirationTime passwordExpWarned >passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime ac countUnlockTime >passwordHistory passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThrough Limit >nsSizeLimit nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock" >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=4 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 >etime=0 >dn="uid=admin,ou=administrators,ou=topologymanagement,o=netscaperoot" >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=5 RESULT err=0 tag=101 >nentries=1 etime=0 >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=6 SRCH base="cn=Fedora Directory >Server, cn=Server Group, cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org, >ou=preferredcare.org, o=Netsca peRoot" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" >attrs="* aci passwordExpirationTime pas swordExpWarned >passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime accountUnlockTime password >History passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThroughLimit >nsSizeLimit nsTime Limit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock" >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=6 RESULT err=0 tag=101 >nentries=1 etime=0 >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=7 MOD dn="cn=Fedora Directory >Server, cn= Server Group, cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org, >ou=preferredcare.org, o=NetscapeR oot" >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=7 RESULT err=0 tag=103 >nentries=0 etime=0 >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=8 SRCH base="cn=Fedora Directory >Server, cn=Server Group, cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org, >ou=preferredcare.org, o=Netsca peRoot" scope=1 >filter="(objectClass=nsDirectoryServer)" attrs="* aci passwordEx >pirationTime passwordExpWarned passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime >accountUnl ockTime passwordHistory passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId >nsLookThroughLimit ns SizeLimit nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole >nsRoleDN nsAccountLock" >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=8 RESULT err=0 tag=101 >nentries=1 etime=0 >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=9 SRCH >base="cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11, cn=Fedo ra Directory Server, cn=Server >Group, cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org, ou=prefer redcare.org, o=NetscapeRoot" >scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="* aci passw ordExpirationTime >passwordExpWarned passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime accou >ntUnlockTime passwordHistory passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId >nsLookThroughLim it nsSizeLimit nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole >nsRoleDN nsAccountLock" >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=9 RESULT err=0 tag=101 >nentries=1 etime=0 >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=10 SRCH >base="cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedo ra Directory Server,cn=Server >Group,cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org,ou=preferred >care.org,o=NetscapeRoot" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="* aci >passwordE xpirationTime passwordExpWarned passwordRetryCount >retryCountResetTime accountUn lockTime passwordHistory >passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThroughLimit n sSizeLimit >nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock" >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=10 RESULT err=0 tag=101 >nentries=1 etime= 0 >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 RESULT err=19 tag=103 >nentries=0 etime =0 >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 MOD >dn="cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedora Directory Server,cn=Server >Group,cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org,ou=preferredcar >e.org,o=NetscapeRoot", invalid password syntax > > >-----Original Message----- >From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard >Megginson >Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:06 AM >To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >Bliss, Aaron wrote: > > > >>I've been able to reproduce; after setting the new password policy >>(require 1 digit, 1 special, etc) and then I attempt to use a password >>that isn't compliant, this error is logged and the users new password >>is not accepted. >>[13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 RESULT err=19 tag=103 >>nentries=0 etime=0 >> >> >> >> >Can you find out what this operation is? It's either an ADD or MOD - >just search before that line for "conn=1073 op=10". I'd like to know >what the DN is. > > > >>So, it looks like everything is working like it is suppose to....it's >>still interesting that I received that error during the upgrade.... >> >>Aaron >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bliss, >>Aaron >>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 10:04 PM >>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >>Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from >>fds >>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >> >>It only seems to be in the access log 1 time; looks like it only >>happened during the upgrade >>[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 RESULT err=19 tag=103 >>nentries=0 etime=0 Is there an easy way to verify that the new >>password >> >> > > > >>schema is being used? >> >>Thanks. >>Aaron >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of >>Richard >> >> > > > >>Megginson >>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 9:54 PM >>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >>Cc: Bliss, Aaron >>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from >>fds >>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >> >>Bliss, Aaron wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>Well, I upgraded the fds rpm; after a reboot all looks okay, however >>>I >>> >>> > > > >>>noticed this information in the setup logfile; is this indicative that >>>something failed to update properly? Perhaps the new schema files? >>>How can I verify that the new schema files are in use? Thanks very >>>much. >>> >>>Start Slapd Starting Slapd server reconfiguration. >>>Fatal Slapd ERROR: Could not update Directory Server Instance URL >>>ldap://fds1.preferredcare.org:389/o=NetscapeRoot user id admin DN >>>cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedora Directory Server,cn=Server >>>Group,cn=fds1.preferredcare.org,ou=preferredcare.org,o=NetscapeRoot >>>(19:Constraint violation) >>>Configuring Administration Server... >>>InstallInfo: Apache Directory "ApacheDir" is missing. >>> >>>The proper fds version is disaplyed in the display console, and the >>>new >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>password enforcement options seem to be available. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Check your directory server access log - look for err=19 - constraint >>violation - to see which operation it's complaining about. >> >> >> >> >> >>>Aaron >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Bliss, Aaron >>>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM >>>To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.' >>>Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from >>>fds >>>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >>> >>>Ah, thanks again. >>> >>>Aaron >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >>>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of >>>Richard >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>Megginson >>>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM >>>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >>>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from >>>fds >>>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >>> >>>Bliss, Aaron wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Thanks; just so I understand, I have to run the setup script even >>>>though my databases have already been configured? I did not have to >>>>do >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>this on my test box in order to upgrade. Thanks. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>Setup will copy in the new schema files required to use the new >>>password syntax checking, so if you skip that, you'll have to copy >>>them >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>in manually. Setup will also make sure the console reports the >>>correct >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>version of directory server. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Aaron >>>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >>>>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of >>>>Richard >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Megginson >>>>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:59 PM >>>>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >>>>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from >>>>fds >>>>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >>>> >>>>Bliss, Aaron wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>I'm planning on upgrading both my supplier and consumer fds servers >>>>>tonight; do I need to worry about their server certificates? I'll >>>>>just >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>be running rpm -Uvh fedora....Thanks very much. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>Upgrade shouldn't touch any ssl information. >>>> >>>>After doing the rpm -U, do cd /opt/fedora-ds ; ./setup/setup and >>>>follow >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>the prompts. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Aaron >>>>> >>>>>www.preferredcare.org >>>>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. >>>>> >>>>> >D. > > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>Power and Associates >>>>> >>>>>Confidentiality Notice: >>>>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended >>>>>for >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >>>>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of >>>>this >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >>>>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >>>>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >>>>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication >>>>in >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >>>>the copies you received. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>>>>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>>>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>www.preferredcare.org >>>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>>> >>>> > > > >>>>Power and Associates >>>> >>>>Confidentiality Notice: >>>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >>>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of >>>this >>> >>> > > > >>>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >>>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >>>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >>>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication >>>in >>> >>> > > > >>>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >>>the copies you received. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>-- >>>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>>>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>www.preferredcare.org >>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>>Power and Associates >>> >>>Confidentiality Notice: >>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >>> >>> >>> >>> >>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >>the copies you received. >> >> >> >> >>>-- >>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>www.preferredcare.org >>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>Power and Associates >> >>Confidentiality Notice: >>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >>the copies you received. >> >> >>-- >>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> >>-- >>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> >> >> > > >www.preferredcare.org >"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >Power and Associates > >Confidentiality Notice: >The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received. > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > www.preferredcare.org "An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. Power and Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received.

2 1

[Fedora-directory-users] Problem with glib
by M Zainal Abidin 15 Mar '06

15 Mar '06

Hello all, I have a bit problem here. I'm using fedora core 4. The problem is i cannot install xmms player foe movie. The system said cannot found glib-1.2.2.Icannot install glib. Why? Can anyone teach me how to install it.. Regard, newbie

2 1

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2
by Bliss, Aaron 15 Mar '06

15 Mar '06

Is there any easy way that I can verify that the schemas have been updated properly? Thanks. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Bliss, Aaron Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 1:34 PM To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.' Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 I believe this is what your looking for, here is an example when I intentionally attempt to break the password rules: [13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 RESULT err=19 tag=103 nentries=0 et ime=0 [13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 MOD dn="uid=awbtest,ou=users,dc=pre ferredcare,dc=org", invalid password syntax Here is the error that occurred during the upgrade (I wouldn't worry too much about the entries below that reference fds1 instead of al-lnx-s11, I manually typed that after pasting the error log, as I wasn't comfortable displaying the real server name, but it doesn't really matter now, the real server name is al-lnx-s11) [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=4 BIND dn="uid=admin, ou=Administrators, ou=TopologyManagement, o=NetscapeRoot" method=128 version=3 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=5 SRCH base="cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare. org, ou=preferredcare.org, o=NetscapeRoot" scope=2 filter="(&(objectClass=nsAppl ication)(nsNickName=slapd)(nsInstalledLocation=/opt/fedora-ds))" attrs="* aci pa sswordExpirationTime passwordExpWarned passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime ac countUnlockTime passwordHistory passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThrough Limit nsSizeLimit nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock" [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=4 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0 dn="uid=admin,ou=administrators,ou=topologymanagement,o=netscaperoot" [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=5 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=6 SRCH base="cn=Fedora Directory Server, cn=Server Group, cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org, ou=preferredcare.org, o=Netsca peRoot" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="* aci passwordExpirationTime pas swordExpWarned passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime accountUnlockTime password History passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThroughLimit nsSizeLimit nsTime Limit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock" [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=6 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=7 MOD dn="cn=Fedora Directory Server, cn= Server Group, cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org, ou=preferredcare.org, o=NetscapeR oot" [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=7 RESULT err=0 tag=103 nentries=0 etime=0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=8 SRCH base="cn=Fedora Directory Server, cn=Server Group, cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org, ou=preferredcare.org, o=Netsca peRoot" scope=1 filter="(objectClass=nsDirectoryServer)" attrs="* aci passwordEx pirationTime passwordExpWarned passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime accountUnl ockTime passwordHistory passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThroughLimit ns SizeLimit nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock" [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=8 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=9 SRCH base="cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11, cn=Fedo ra Directory Server, cn=Server Group, cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org, ou=prefer redcare.org, o=NetscapeRoot" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="* aci passw ordExpirationTime passwordExpWarned passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime accou ntUnlockTime passwordHistory passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThroughLim it nsSizeLimit nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock" [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=9 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=10 SRCH base="cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedo ra Directory Server,cn=Server Group,cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org,ou=preferred care.org,o=NetscapeRoot" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="* aci passwordE xpirationTime passwordExpWarned passwordRetryCount retryCountResetTime accountUn lockTime passwordHistory passwordAllowChangeTime nsUniqueId nsLookThroughLimit n sSizeLimit nsTimeLimit nsIdleTimeout nsRole nsRoleDN nsAccountLock" [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=10 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime= 0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 RESULT err=19 tag=103 nentries=0 etime =0 [13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 MOD dn="cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedora Directory Server,cn=Server Group,cn=al-lnx-s11.preferredcare.org,ou=preferredcar e.org,o=NetscapeRoot", invalid password syntax -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard Megginson Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 10:06 AM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Bliss, Aaron wrote: >I've been able to reproduce; after setting the new password policy >(require 1 digit, 1 special, etc) and then I attempt to use a password >that isn't compliant, this error is logged and the users new password >is not accepted. >[13/Mar/2006:22:19:42 -0500] conn=1073 op=10 RESULT err=19 tag=103 >nentries=0 etime=0 > > Can you find out what this operation is? It's either an ADD or MOD - just search before that line for "conn=1073 op=10". I'd like to know what the DN is. >So, it looks like everything is working like it is suppose to....it's >still interesting that I received that error during the upgrade.... > >Aaron > >-----Original Message----- >From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Bliss, >Aaron >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 10:04 PM >To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >It only seems to be in the access log 1 time; looks like it only >happened during the upgrade >[13/Mar/2006:21:15:56 -0500] conn=0 op=11 RESULT err=19 tag=103 >nentries=0 etime=0 Is there an easy way to verify that the new password >schema is being used? > >Thanks. >Aaron > >-----Original Message----- >From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard >Megginson >Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 9:54 PM >To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >Cc: Bliss, Aaron >Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds >1.0.1 to 1.0.2 > >Bliss, Aaron wrote: > > > >>Well, I upgraded the fds rpm; after a reboot all looks okay, however I >>noticed this information in the setup logfile; is this indicative that >>something failed to update properly? Perhaps the new schema files? >>How can I verify that the new schema files are in use? Thanks very >>much. >> >>Start Slapd Starting Slapd server reconfiguration. >>Fatal Slapd ERROR: Could not update Directory Server Instance URL >>ldap://fds1.preferredcare.org:389/o=NetscapeRoot user id admin DN >>cn=slapd-al-lnx-s11,cn=Fedora Directory Server,cn=Server >>Group,cn=fds1.preferredcare.org,ou=preferredcare.org,o=NetscapeRoot >>(19:Constraint violation) >>Configuring Administration Server... >>InstallInfo: Apache Directory "ApacheDir" is missing. >> >>The proper fds version is disaplyed in the display console, and the >>new >> >> > > > >>password enforcement options seem to be available. >> >> >> >> >Check your directory server access log - look for err=19 - constraint >violation - to see which operation it's complaining about. > > > >>Aaron >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Bliss, Aaron >>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM >>To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.' >>Subject: RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from >>fds >>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >> >>Ah, thanks again. >> >>Aaron >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of >>Richard >> >> > > > >>Megginson >>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 2:08 PM >>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from >>fds >>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >> >>Bliss, Aaron wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>>Thanks; just so I understand, I have to run the setup script even >>>though my databases have already been configured? I did not have to >>>do >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>this on my test box in order to upgrade. Thanks. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Setup will copy in the new schema files required to use the new >>password syntax checking, so if you skip that, you'll have to copy >>them >> >> > > > >>in manually. Setup will also make sure the console reports the >>correct >> >> > > > >>version of directory server. >> >> >> >> >> >>>Aaron >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >>>[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of >>>Richard >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>Megginson >>>Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:59 PM >>>To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. >>>Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from >>>fds >>>1.0.1 to 1.0.2 >>> >>>Bliss, Aaron wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>I'm planning on upgrading both my supplier and consumer fds servers >>>>tonight; do I need to worry about their server certificates? I'll >>>>just >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>be running rpm -Uvh fedora....Thanks very much. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>Upgrade shouldn't touch any ssl information. >>> >>>After doing the rpm -U, do cd /opt/fedora-ds ; ./setup/setup and >>>follow >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> >>>the prompts. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Aaron >>>> >>>>www.preferredcare.org >>>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>>> >>>> > > > >>>>Power and Associates >>>> >>>>Confidentiality Notice: >>>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >>>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of >>>this >>> >>> > > > >>>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >>>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >>>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >>>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication >>>in >>> >>> > > > >>>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >>>the copies you received. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>-- >>>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>>>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>www.preferredcare.org >>>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>>Power and Associates >>> >>>Confidentiality Notice: >>>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >>> >>> >>> >>> >>the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >>contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >>message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >>responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >>notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >>information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >>error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >>the copies you received. >> >> >> >> >>>-- >>>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>www.preferredcare.org >>"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >>Power and Associates >> >>Confidentiality Notice: >>The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >> >> >the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >the copies you received. > > >>-- >>Fedora-directory-users mailing list >>Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users >> >> >> >> > > >www.preferredcare.org >"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >Power and Associates > >Confidentiality Notice: >The information contained in this electronic message is intended for >the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may >contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this >message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent >responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby >notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this >information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in >error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy >the copies you received. > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > www.preferredcare.org "An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. Power and Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received.

2 1

[Fedora-directory-users] Running Fedora on windows
by ismail gunes 14 Mar '06

14 Mar '06

Hi all, I'm new at This group and Fedora. I was looking for some directory servers on the web and I've seen the Fedora directory server. I wonder whether the Fedora directory server is available on windows or not. That is, can i install and run Fedora on a Windows machine? Thanks in advance. --------------------------------- Yahoo! kullaniyor musunuz? Simdi, 1GB e-posta saklama alani sunuyor http://tr.mail.yahoo.com

3 2

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

389-users March 2006