389-users March 2006

389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org

55 participants
89 discussions

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2
by Bliss, Aaron 13 Mar '06

13 Mar '06

Thanks; just so I understand, I have to run the setup script even though my databases have already been configured? I did not have to do this on my test box in order to upgrade. Thanks. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard Megginson Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:59 PM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Bliss, Aaron wrote: >I'm planning on upgrading both my supplier and consumer fds servers >tonight; do I need to worry about their server certificates? I'll just >be running rpm -Uvh fedora....Thanks very much. > > Upgrade shouldn't touch any ssl information. After doing the rpm -U, do cd /opt/fedora-ds ; ./setup/setup and follow the prompts. >Aaron > >www.preferredcare.org >"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >Power and Associates > >Confidentiality Notice: >The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received. > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > www.preferredcare.org "An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. Power and Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received.

2 1

[Fedora-directory-users] Getting ready to upgrade from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2
by Bliss, Aaron 13 Mar '06

13 Mar '06

I'm planning on upgrading both my supplier and consumer fds servers tonight; do I need to worry about their server certificates? I'll just be running rpm -Uvh fedora....Thanks very much. Aaron www.preferredcare.org "An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. Power and Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received.

2 1

[Fedora-directory-users] Directory Express...customize? separate/relocate?
by Jim Hogan 10 Mar '06

10 Mar '06

I have been looking at Directory Express pages on our new setup. Very nice! I have a few questions: I'll need to make a few schema extensions for some attributes that will be set on a do-it-yourself basis (using Directory Express, I hope). Is there any sort of guide to customizing Directory Express in such a way that changes will be preserved during future upgrades? I've rummaged aound in /var/opt/fedora-ds/clients/dsgw to get a sense of the layout, but didn't know if there was a systematic guide of sorts. (I could probably figure this next one out with more rummaging, but one of you might provide a quick "Don't even bother!" answer)... Is it feasible to move/separate the Directory Express components so that they could run on a server separate from the admin server? What I have in place is an intranet server running under PubCookie. My thought is to put "DE" under this existing PubCookie regime and take advantage of stuff like REMOTE_USER vars. Just not sure if that is doable. I also started to look at moving the Fedora-DS httpd.worker under PubCookie, but that would seem more dubious. Thanks! Jim -- /*********************************************************/ Jim Hogan /*********************************************************/

2 3

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] Not sure what version of java is needed for fds 1.0.2
by Bliss, Aaron 09 Mar '06

09 Mar '06

I did some more testing; I removed jre-1_5_0_06-linux-i586.rpm, re-installed IBMJava2-142-ia32-SDK-1.4.2-3.0 and all seems okay; thanks again for your help. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Richard Megginson Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 4:09 PM To: General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project. Subject: Re: [Fedora-directory-users] Not sure what version of java is needed for fds 1.0.2 Bliss, Aaron wrote: >Couple of small questions after upgrading from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2. I >apologize in advance if this question has been answered, however I >didn't see anywhere that mentions what version of jre is required; on a >test box, I had issues starting the console with >IBMJava2-142-ia32-SDK-1.4.2-3.0 installed; I had to install >jre-1_5_0_06-linux-i586.rpm from Sun in order to get rid of the java >errors; was this upgrade necessary? > I don't think so - what errors did you get? >Also, I noticed that after starting >the console, the version that is displayed (when highlighting the >Directory Server icon) is still 1.0.1, however rpm -qa | grep fedora-ds >shows fedora-ds-1.0.2-1.RHEL4; slapd error logs show that >fedora-directory 1.0.2 B2006.060.1928 starting up; Is this just a small >bug? Thanks again. > > Yes, the console still shows version 1.0.1, but it's really 1.0.2. >Aaron > >-----Original Message----- >From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com >[mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jim >Summers >Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 12:55 PM >To: fedora-directory-users >Subject: [Fedora-directory-users] LdapSearch Field Length > >Hello All, > >I was modifying the value of an attribute, automountInformation in this >instance. The modify works as expected, but when I use ldapsearch to >dump the > entry containing the new value it seems to truncate it at 78 >characters, that is (attribute name + attribute value). The remainder >of the value is on the next line, which has caused some scripts to not >work as expected. > >The manpage for ldapsearch did not reveal any clues or switches to get >around this length limit. Could it be a server limit? > >Interesting also is that db2ldif produces the same behavior. > >Ideas on what I could do to get the value retruned back on one line? > >STRANGE EXAMPLE OUTPUT: >=============== >automountInformation: -rw,actimeo=30,rsize=32768,wsize=32768 >fs001:/raid/facst > aff/faharris >=============== > >EXPECTED OUTPUT: >=============== >automountInformation: -rw,actimeo=30,rsize=32768,wsize=32768 >fs001:/raid/facstaff/faharris >=============== > >The above examples may not be clear due to email wrapping, but in the >first one ldapsearch truncates at the "t" and in the second there is >not truncating. > >TIA >-- >Jim Summers >School of Computer Science-University of Oklahoma >------------------------------------------------- > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > > >www.preferredcare.org >"An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. >Power and Associates > >Confidentiality Notice: >The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received. > > >-- >Fedora-directory-users mailing list >Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users > > www.preferredcare.org "An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. Power and Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received.

1 0

[Fedora-directory-users] Not sure what version of java is needed for fds 1.0.2
by Bliss, Aaron 09 Mar '06

09 Mar '06

Couple of small questions after upgrading from fds 1.0.1 to 1.0.2. I apologize in advance if this question has been answered, however I didn't see anywhere that mentions what version of jre is required; on a test box, I had issues starting the console with IBMJava2-142-ia32-SDK-1.4.2-3.0 installed; I had to install jre-1_5_0_06-linux-i586.rpm from Sun in order to get rid of the java errors; was this upgrade necessary? Also, I noticed that after starting the console, the version that is displayed (when highlighting the Directory Server icon) is still 1.0.1, however rpm -qa | grep fedora-ds shows fedora-ds-1.0.2-1.RHEL4; slapd error logs show that fedora-directory 1.0.2 B2006.060.1928 starting up; Is this just a small bug? Thanks again. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jim Summers Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 12:55 PM To: fedora-directory-users Subject: [Fedora-directory-users] LdapSearch Field Length Hello All, I was modifying the value of an attribute, automountInformation in this instance. The modify works as expected, but when I use ldapsearch to dump the entry containing the new value it seems to truncate it at 78 characters, that is (attribute name + attribute value). The remainder of the value is on the next line, which has caused some scripts to not work as expected. The manpage for ldapsearch did not reveal any clues or switches to get around this length limit. Could it be a server limit? Interesting also is that db2ldif produces the same behavior. Ideas on what I could do to get the value retruned back on one line? STRANGE EXAMPLE OUTPUT: =============== automountInformation: -rw,actimeo=30,rsize=32768,wsize=32768 fs001:/raid/facst aff/faharris =============== EXPECTED OUTPUT: =============== automountInformation: -rw,actimeo=30,rsize=32768,wsize=32768 fs001:/raid/facstaff/faharris =============== The above examples may not be clear due to email wrapping, but in the first one ldapsearch truncates at the "t" and in the second there is not truncating. TIA -- Jim Summers School of Computer Science-University of Oklahoma ------------------------------------------------- -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users www.preferredcare.org "An Outstanding Member Experience," Preferred Care HMO Plans -- J. D. Power and Associates Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic message is intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity named above and may contain privileged or confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, distribution or copying of this information is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone and destroy the copies you received.

2 1

[Fedora-directory-users] LdapSearch Field Length
by Jim Summers 09 Mar '06

09 Mar '06

Hello All, I was modifying the value of an attribute, automountInformation in this instance. The modify works as expected, but when I use ldapsearch to dump the entry containing the new value it seems to truncate it at 78 characters, that is (attribute name + attribute value). The remainder of the value is on the next line, which has caused some scripts to not work as expected. The manpage for ldapsearch did not reveal any clues or switches to get around this length limit. Could it be a server limit? Interesting also is that db2ldif produces the same behavior. Ideas on what I could do to get the value retruned back on one line? STRANGE EXAMPLE OUTPUT: =============== automountInformation: -rw,actimeo=30,rsize=32768,wsize=32768 fs001:/raid/facst aff/faharris =============== EXPECTED OUTPUT: =============== automountInformation: -rw,actimeo=30,rsize=32768,wsize=32768 fs001:/raid/facstaff/faharris =============== The above examples may not be clear due to email wrapping, but in the first one ldapsearch truncates at the "t" and in the second there is not truncating. TIA -- Jim Summers School of Computer Science-University of Oklahoma -------------------------------------------------

4 4

[Fedora-directory-users] After upgrading for 1.0.1 to 1.0.2 Console don't start
by Francesco Zanni 08 Mar '06

08 Mar '06

Hi, I'm currently evaluating FDS to use it in our environment. I was using FDS 1.0.1 with full success, but after upgrading it to 1.0.2 the Admin Console don't start... I'm using Fedora core 4 on an Intel machine with JRE 1.4.2_10 When I start the console this is the result: GC Warning: Out of Memory! Returning NIL! Exception in thread "main" java.lang.OutOfMemoryError <<No stacktrace available>> I tried to increase the java memory pool in the startconsole script (-mx128m instead of 64) but the result is the following: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NullPointerException at java.util.Hashtable.put(java.lang.Object, java.lang.Object) (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at javax.swing.UIDefaults.putDefaults(java.lang.Object[]) (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at com.netscape.management.nmclf.SuiLookAndFeel.initComponentDefaults(javax.swi ng.UIDefaults) (Unknown Source) at com.netscape.management.nmclf.SuiLookAndFeel.getDefaults() (Unknown Source) at javax.swing.UIManager.getDefaults() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at javax.swing.UIManager.getUI(javax.swing.JComponent) (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at javax.swing.JPanel.updateUI() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at javax.swing.JPanel.JPanel(java.awt.LayoutManager, boolean) (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at javax.swing.JPanel.JPanel() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at javax.swing.JRootPane.createGlassPane() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at javax.swing.JRootPane.getGlassPane() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at javax.swing.JRootPane.JRootPane() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at javax.swing.JFrame.createRootPane() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at javax.swing.JFrame.getRootPane() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at javax.swing.JFrame.frameInit() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at javax.swing.JFrame.JFrame() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at com.netscape.management.client.console.Console.Console(java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String, java.lang.String) (Unknown Source) at com.netscape.management.client.console.Console.main(java.lang.String[]) (Unknown Source) at gnu.java.lang.MainThread.call_main() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) at gnu.java.lang.MainThread.run() (/usr/lib/libgcj.so.6.0.0) Why this happens ? Thanks a lot in advance. Cheers Francesco Zanni CSP SpA Tel. +39 02 36575509 Fax. +39 02 36575599 E-mail fzanni(a)cspnet.it Web www.cspnet.it

5 4

[Fedora-directory-users] fds and sendamil on solaris9
by basile 08 Mar '06

08 Mar '06

hi i use fds on solaris 9 as users database i can send , receive email , alias works but i have a few mail that seems to be sent but i never receive and here are logs i can see just after sendmail receive the mail : Mar 8 16:32:39 mailer sm-mta[874]: [ID 801593 mail.info] k28FWdpb000874: from=<toto(a)siris.sorbonne.fr>, size=375, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<440EF916.30503(a)siris.sorbonne.fr>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=Daemon0, relay=pc.sorbonne.fr [xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx] Mar 8 16:32:39 mailer sm-mta[878]: [ID 293258 mail.error] libsldap: Status: 91 Mesg: Error 0 Mar 8 16:32:39 mailer last message repeated 1 time Mar 8 16:32:39 mailer sm-mta[878]: [ID 293258 mail.error] libsldap: Status: 7 Mesg: Session error no available conn. thanks basile

1 0

[Fedora-directory-users] getlocalsid error
by Mont Rothstein 07 Mar '06

07 Mar '06

I've just installed Fedora Directory Server (1.0.1) on RHEL 4. Samba version is 3.0.10 I am attempting to follow: http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/wiki/Howto:Samba but I am getting an error with net getlocalsid. The output is: [2006/03/06 10:00:21, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_connect_system(850) failed to bind to server with dn= cn=Directory Manager Error: Can't contact LDAP server (unknown) [2006/03/06 10:00:21, 0] lib/smbldap.c:smbldap_search_suffix(1155) smbldap_search_suffix: Problem during the LDAP search: (unknown) (Timed out) SID for domain RHELES4RS1 is: S-1-5-21-807157010-1821471989-4121009367 While I get a SID I assume I should not proceed with these errors. I've gone over my config I can't find my error. I've searched online and can't find anything. The full ouput of testparm is below. Any ideas as to what I've done wrong? Thanks, -Mont Load smb config files from /etc/samba/smb.conf Processing section "[netlogon]" Processing section "[profiles]" Processing section "[homes]" Processing section "[printers]" Processing section "[repository]" Processing section "[root directory]" Loaded services file OK. WARNING: You have some share names that are longer than 12 characters. These may not be accessible to some older clients. (Eg. Windows9x, WindowsMe, and smbclient prior to Samba 3.0.) Server role: ROLE_DOMAIN_PDC Press enter to see a dump of your service definitions # Global parameters [global] server string = rheles4rs1 password server = None passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://rheles4rs1.forayadams.foray.com username map = /etc/samba/smbusers log file = /var/log/%m.log max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 printcap name = /etc/printcap logon path = \\%L\profiles\%u logon drive = H: logon home = \\%L\%u\profiles domain logons = Yes os level = 33 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes dns proxy = No wins support = Yes ldap admin dn = cn=Directory Manager ldap group suffix = ou=Groups ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers ldap suffix = dc=forayadams,dc=foray,dc=com ldap user suffix = ou=People idmap uid = 16777216-33554431 idmap gid = 16777216-33554431 cups options = raw [netlogon] path = /var/lib/samba/netlogon browseable = No [profiles] path = /var/lib/samba/profiles read only = No create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [repository] path = /repository valid users = testadmin, testuser read only = No [root directory] path = / valid users = mont read only = No

1 1

RE: [Fedora-directory-users] HELP: Error while start startconsole
by Goolsby, Daniel S (Daniel) 07 Mar '06

07 Mar '06

I had a similar problem and corrected it by creating the following file: -bash-3.00$ vi /etc/profile.d/java.sh # set java home enviroment variable JAVA_HOME=/usr/java/jre1.5.0_06/bin export JAVA_HOME You might have to have java in your path, that can be done with export PATH=$PATH:$JAVA_HOME (in the same profile) Where "/usr/java/jre1.5.0_06/bin" is the path where java is installed on your box. Daniel -----Original Message----- From: fedora-directory-users-bounces(a)redhat.com [mailto:fedora-directory-users-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Alex Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 11:36 AM To: 'General discussion list for the Fedora Directory server project.' Subject: R: [Fedora-directory-users] HELP: Error while start startconsole > > > Which java are you using? What is your operating system and version? > Hi, thanks for interesting on my problem.... Ok, this is the scenario: I'm testing on lab with 2 server configured with CentOs 4.2 operating System (derived from redhat enterprise Source)...in their website there is a faq that says to download Fedora directory server...1.0.2 is compatible......everything works well and install finished correcty. But when I try to start console I received error below...I have the exact copy on vmware for testing at home...so if you have some good news...I can try on fly... Java is Sun Version version 1.4.2 but I have downloaded 1.5.0 too Thanks in advance > >./startconsole -u magobin -a http://ldap.example.com:55087 > >Warning: -ms8m not understood. Ignoring. > >Warning: -mx64m not understood. Ignoring. > >Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: method > >com.netscape.management.client.util.RemoteImage.setImage was > not found. > > at _Jv_ResolvePoolEntry(java.lang.Class, int) ...CUT -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned by Verizon Managed Email Content Service, using Skeptic(tm) technology powered by MessageLabs. For more information on Verizon Managed Email Content Service, visit http://www.verizonbusiness.com. ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned by Verizon Managed Email Content Service, using Skeptic� technology powered by MessageLabs. For more information on Verizon Managed Email Content Service, visit http://www.verizonbusiness.com. ______________________________________________________________________

4 11

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

389-users March 2006