CI June 2022

ci@lists.fedoraproject.org

6 participants
4 discussions

STI tests.yml: Custom defined variables
by Miro Hrončok 23 Jun '22

23 Jun '22

Hello, please bare with me because my Ansible skills are close to none. I only use it for Fedora CI. I've read https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/user_guide/playbooks_variables.html… I have this (simplified) tests.yml: --- - hosts: localhost roles: - role: standard-test-basic tests: - smoke: dir: python/smoke run: VERSION=3.11 ./venv.sh required_packages: - python3.11 - python3.11-devel Full version in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.11/blob/rawhide/f/tests/tests.yml I would like to replace all occurrences of 3.11 with a variable: --- - hosts: localhost roles: - role: standard-test-basic tests: - smoke: dir: python/smoke run: VERSION={{ pybasever }} ./venv.sh required_packages: - python{{ pybasever }} - python{{ pybasever }}-devel But where do I put pybasever: '3.11' exactly? Bonus question: Can I read the tested package name and regex it into the variable? pybasever: {{ xxx_package_name|pex_regex_replace('^python', '') }} Thanks, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

4 5

[RFC] Build tag in RPM: from NVR to NVRB
by Aleksandra Fedorova 21 Jun '22

21 Jun '22

Hi, all, I'd like to discuss how we can add Build tag in the RPM. As one of the key points is to turn it into a common standard for rpm packages across the ecosystem, the conversation is currently opened upstream [1] and in RHEL Engineering. And I'd like to get Fedora community on board. This is not a finalized proposal and I think it is not ready yet to be a Fedora Change. But I want to start a conversation and ask for opinions. There are also some open questions which need help, especially the requirements around build reason. And alternative suggestions are welcome as well. I've posted long version at https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/rfc-build-tag-in-rpms/39954 You can comment there (simply login with your FAS id) or here on the mailing list. And I am going to update that post with the new feedback. Shorter version: ================================================ We'd like to introduce Build Number/Tag/Id in the rpm metadata. By this change we would like to: * Provide a possibility to change build environment and rebuild rpm packages without changing their content: neither sources nor spec files. * Set a common standard for the RPM-based ecosystem, which can be used not just within Fedora, but also by Remixes, downstreams, SIGs and other distributions. The most visible impact of the proposal would be the filename change: Current: dnf-4.9.0-12.fc36.noarch.rpm Proposed: dnf-4.9.0-12.fc36.34897715.noarch.rpm It can be implemented in two steps: 1) Now → Compatibility mode * Introduce Build tag in the rpm metadata * Introduce “build reason” to be added to rpm changelog as a top entry * Enable passing Build tag value to the build in Koji. The value of the Build tag will be set from Koji build id. * Introduce macro in Release field of the rpm spec files, which adds Build tag after the usual disttag Release: 12.%{?dist}%{?build:.%{build}} * Introduce option to pass “build reason” to a Koji build via koji cli and fedpkg/centpkg tooling. 2) Compatibility mode → Final * Implement support for the upgrade path on the rpm side in a compatible way. So that NV(R’=R+B) and NVRB are treated the same. * Remove %{build} part from Release tag and use independent Build tag for versioning. ================================================ [1] https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/discussions/2031 -- Aleksandra Fedorova CI for Fedora/CentOS Stream/RHEL bookwar on Matrix/IRC

2 1

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora CI SIG
by jbair＠redhat.com 14 Jun '22

14 Jun '22

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora CI SIG on 2022-06-15 from 09:30:00 to 10:00:00 America/Chicago At fedora-ci(a)irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: Fedora CI SIG meeting More information available at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/CI Introduce projects, discuss issues and plans for the future. Please add topics to discuss into our etherpad: https://etherpad.gnome.org/p/fedora-ci This meeting is recurring for every other Wednesday. Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9901/

1 0

Running STI test as non-root
by Miro Hrončok 09 Jun '22

09 Jun '22

Hello CI, we have discovered a serious usability problem in one of our packages that existed for a while but did not show on the CI. Apparently, the problem only shows up when actual users do the things. However, our STI tests on Fedora CI run as root, hiding the issue. I want to stop running our tests as root. Is there some idiomatic way to do that? I was thinking about changing this: tests: - smoke_pypy38: dir: python/smoke run: PYTHON=pypy3.8 VERSION=3.8 ./venv.sh - smoke_pypy39: dir: python/smoke run: PYTHON=pypy3.9 VERSION=3.9 ./venv.sh To this: tests: - create_user: run: adduser testuser - smoke_pypy38: dir: python/smoke run: runuser testuser -c 'PYTHON=pypy3.8 VERSION=3.8 ./venv.sh' - smoke_pypy39: dir: python/smoke run: runuser testuser -c 'PYTHON=pypy3.9 VERSION=3.9 ./venv.sh' But is there some better way? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

1 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

CI June 2022