Was there already some discussion which content will be allowed? Or more precisely: which will not be allowed?
----- Original Message -----
Was there already some discussion which content will be allowed? Or more precisely: which will not be allowed?
AFAIK we will enforce the same licensing as Fedora (bad licenses stuff can't be built in Copr), other than that no restrictions.
-- Miroslav Suchy Red Hat
On 07/02/2013 10:55 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
AFAIK we will enforce the same licensing as Fedora (bad licenses stuff can't be built in Copr), other than that no restrictions.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Bad_Licenses
Hmm, why we can not allow e.g. "W3C Documentation License"? It is bad because "Does not permit modification, different from W3C Software License". Fedora need to do modification from time to time. But we do not.
Or some licenses, which permits commercial use? It is blocker for Fedora. But it is blocker for COPR?
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 11:18:19 +0200 Miroslav Suchý msuchy@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/02/2013 10:55 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
AFAIK we will enforce the same licensing as Fedora (bad licenses stuff can't be built in Copr), other than that no restrictions.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Bad_Licenses
Hmm, why we can not allow e.g. "W3C Documentation License"? It is bad because "Does not permit modification, different from W3C Software License". Fedora need to do modification from time to time. But we do not.
Or some licenses, which permits commercial use? It is blocker for Fedora. But it is blocker for COPR?
We cannot host the files which are under a license we cannot distribute with.
As to your specific license requests - you're going to have to take those to legal@fedoraproject.org
I'm not a lawyer and I don't even want to be one :)
-sv
copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org