Hi,
I'm facing the following issue :
DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://d36uatko69830t.cloudfront.net/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/... (IP: 99.84.185.90) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://d36uatko69830t.cloudfront.net/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/... (IP: 99.84.185.90) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6... (IP: 184.94.206.98) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6... (IP: 184.94.206.98) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://d36uatko69830t.cloudfront.net/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/... (IP: 99.84.185.90) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6... (IP: 184.94.206.98) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6... (IP: 184.94.206.98) DEBUG util.py:586: [FAILED] devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.aarch64.rpm: No more mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success
Anyway to fix it ?
Jean-Marc
Hi Jean-Marc,
On Friday, March 20, 2020 3:30:53 AM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
Hi,
I'm facing the following issue :
DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://d36uatko69830t.cloudfront.net/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/... (IP: 99.84.185.90)
This seems like https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8679 but now it affects EL7. I'll try to communicate fix, feel free to help.
Pavel
DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://d36uatko69830t.cloudfront.net/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/... (IP: 99.84.185.90) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6... (IP: 184.94.206.98) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6... (IP: 184.94.206.98) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://d36uatko69830t.cloudfront.net/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/... (IP: 99.84.185.90) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6... (IP: 184.94.206.98) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6... (IP: 184.94.206.98) DEBUG util.py:586: [FAILED] devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.aarch64.rpm: No more mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success
Anyway to fix it ?
Jean-Marc
Le 20/03/2020 à 07:54, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
Hi Jean-Marc,
On Friday, March 20, 2020 3:30:53 AM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
Hi,
I'm facing the following issue :
DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://d36uatko69830t.cloudfront.net/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/... (IP: 99.84.185.90)
This seems like https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8679 but now it affects EL7. I'll try to communicate fix, feel free to help.
I've had a look to the above issue and it's not the same, the failing build requires http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/ repo which hasn't been build yet. Anyway to bypass ?
Pavel
DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://d36uatko69830t.cloudfront.net/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/... (IP: 99.84.185.90) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6... (IP: 184.94.206.98) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6... (IP: 184.94.206.98) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://d36uatko69830t.cloudfront.net/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/... (IP: 99.84.185.90) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6... (IP: 184.94.206.98) DEBUG util.py:586: [MIRROR] devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.aarch64.rpm: Status code: 404 forhttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6... (IP: 184.94.206.98) DEBUG util.py:586: [FAILED] devtoolset-6-gcc-6.3.1-3.1.el7.aarch64.rpm: No more mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success
Anyway to fix it ?
Jean-Marc
*Jean-Marc LIGER* Chef du Service Informatique UFR de Médecine de Paris Centre 15 rue de l'Ecole de médecine 75270 PARIS CEDEX 06 +33 (0)1 53 10 46 82
https://www.facebook.com/univparis/ https://www.instagram.com/univ_paris/?hl=fr https://twitter.com/Univ_Paris https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5WhlXe1I_eRCtEx7cj3ZKg?fbclid=IwAR1vwGdU3uTudr9xzGkiXoNdg0tlasAeDl2lkkTP-cyEP_snhPMfdU_Oc9w
On Friday, March 20, 2020 12:30:06 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
I've had a look to the above issue and it's not the same, the failing build requires http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/ repo which hasn't been build yet. Anyway to bypass ?
How it comes that it wasn't built yet? If it was not, we wouldn't have metadata pointing at the non-existing RPMs, or?
Pavel
Le 20/03/2020 à 13:27, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Friday, March 20, 2020 12:30:06 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
I've had a look to the above issue and it's not the same, the failing build requires http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/ repo which hasn't been build yet. Anyway to bypass ?
How it comes that it wasn't built yet? If it was not, we wouldn't have metadata pointing at the non-existing RPMs, or?
Pavel
I agree it probably has been built, I have no way to investigate or help more, but the copy of this repo is missing.
JM
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:35:08PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
Le 20/03/2020 à 13:27, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Friday, March 20, 2020 12:30:06 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
I've had a look to the above issue and it's not the same, the failing build requires http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/ repo which hasn't been build yet. Anyway to bypass ?
How it comes that it wasn't built yet? If it was not, we wouldn't have metadata pointing at the non-existing RPMs, or?
Pavel
I agree it probably has been built, I have no way to investigate or help more, but the copy of this repo is missing.
This may have been a EOL repo that was removed?
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2020-March/036649.html
kevin
On Saturday, March 21, 2020 12:08:52 AM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:35:08PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
Le 20/03/2020 à 13:27, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Friday, March 20, 2020 12:30:06 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
I've had a look to the above issue and it's not the same, the failing build requires http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/ repo which hasn't been build yet. Anyway to bypass ?
How it comes that it wasn't built yet? If it was not, we wouldn't have metadata pointing at the non-existing RPMs, or?
Pavel
I agree it probably has been built, I have no way to investigate or help more, but the copy of this repo is missing.
This may have been a EOL repo that was removed?
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2020-March/036649.html
Thanks for the link!
I'm still not sure, there must be something wrong. If the mirror(s) were correctly rsynced, there wouldn't be single moment in time when the metadata referenced non-existing files?
Jean-Marc, do you have link to the build?
Pavel
Le 21/03/2020 à 16:57, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Saturday, March 21, 2020 12:08:52 AM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:35:08PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
Le 20/03/2020 à 13:27, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Friday, March 20, 2020 12:30:06 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
I've had a look to the above issue and it's not the same, the failing build requires http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/ repo which hasn't been build yet. Anyway to bypass ?
How it comes that it wasn't built yet? If it was not, we wouldn't have metadata pointing at the non-existing RPMs, or?
Pavel
I agree it probably has been built, I have no way to investigate or help more, but the copy of this repo is missing.
This may have been a EOL repo that was removed?
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2020-March/036649.html
Thanks for the link!
I'm still not sure, there must be something wrong. If the mirror(s) were correctly rsynced, there wouldn't be single moment in time when the metadata referenced non-existing files?
Jean-Marc, do you have link to the build?
I've suppressed it, but I've just tried to build my package again an the problem is over as there is no more link to old devtoolset-6 metadatas !
JM
Pavel
Le 21/03/2020 à 17:26, Jean-Marc Liger a écrit :
Le 21/03/2020 à 16:57, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Saturday, March 21, 2020 12:08:52 AM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:35:08PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
Le 20/03/2020 à 13:27, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Friday, March 20, 2020 12:30:06 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
I've had a look to the above issue and it's not the same, the failing build requireshttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/ repo which hasn't been build yet. Anyway to bypass ?
How it comes that it wasn't built yet? If it was not, we wouldn't have metadata pointing at the non-existing RPMs, or?
Pavel
I agree it probably has been built, I have no way to investigate or help more, but the copy of this repo is missing.
This may have been a EOL repo that was removed?
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2020-March/036649.html
Thanks for the link!
I'm still not sure, there must be something wrong. If the mirror(s) were correctly rsynced, there wouldn't be single moment in time when the metadata referenced non-existing files?
Jean-Marc, do you have link to the build?
I've suppressed it, but I've just tried to build my package again an the problem is over as there is no more link to old devtoolset-6 metadatas !
Hi Pavel,
This problem is back again, here is the link to the build :
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ligenix/enterprise-virtua...
JM
JM
Pavel
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.o...
*Jean-Marc LIGER* Chef du Service Informatique UFR de Médecine de Paris Centre 15 rue de l'Ecole de médecine 75270 PARIS CEDEX 06 +33 (0)1 53 10 46 82
https://www.facebook.com/univparis/ https://www.instagram.com/univ_paris/?hl=fr https://twitter.com/Univ_Paris https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5WhlXe1I_eRCtEx7cj3ZKg?fbclid=IwAR1vwGdU3uTudr9xzGkiXoNdg0tlasAeDl2lkkTP-cyEP_snhPMfdU_Oc9w
On Thursday, March 26, 2020 11:09:21 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
Le 21/03/2020 à 17:26, Jean-Marc Liger a écrit :
Le 21/03/2020 à 16:57, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Saturday, March 21, 2020 12:08:52 AM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:35:08PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
Le 20/03/2020 à 13:27, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Friday, March 20, 2020 12:30:06 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote: > I've had a look to the above issue and it's not the same, the failing build > requireshttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/ repo > which hasn't been build yet. Anyway to bypass ? How it comes that it wasn't built yet? If it was not, we wouldn't have metadata pointing at the non-existing RPMs, or?
Pavel
I agree it probably has been built, I have no way to investigate or help more, but the copy of this repo is missing.
This may have been a EOL repo that was removed?
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2020-March/036649.html
Thanks for the link!
I'm still not sure, there must be something wrong. If the mirror(s) were correctly rsynced, there wouldn't be single moment in time when the metadata referenced non-existing files?
Jean-Marc, do you have link to the build?
I've suppressed it, but I've just tried to build my package again an the problem is over as there is no more link to old devtoolset-6 metadatas !
Hi Pavel,
This problem is back again, here is the link to the build :
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ligenix/enterprise-virtua...
Thanks for letting us know, I filled CentOS bug report: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17187
And perhaps we should invent some easy-to-tweak DNS mirror blacklist on builders (e.g. etc/hosts hacks). This is going to be discussed on Monday team meeting...
Pavel
JM
JM
Pavel
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.o...
*Jean-Marc LIGER* Chef du Service Informatique UFR de Médecine de Paris Centre 15 rue de l'Ecole de médecine 75270 PARIS CEDEX 06 +33 (0)1 53 10 46 82
https://www.facebook.com/univparis/ https://www.instagram.com/univ_paris/?hl=fr https://twitter.com/Univ_Paris https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5WhlXe1I_eRCtEx7cj3ZKg?fbclid=IwAR1vwGdU3uTudr9xzGkiXoNdg0tlasAeDl2lkkTP-cyEP_snhPMfdU_Oc9w
Le 27/03/2020 à 08:04, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Thursday, March 26, 2020 11:09:21 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
Le 21/03/2020 à 17:26, Jean-Marc Liger a écrit :
Le 21/03/2020 à 16:57, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Saturday, March 21, 2020 12:08:52 AM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:35:08PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
Le 20/03/2020 à 13:27, Pavel Raiskup a écrit : > On Friday, March 20, 2020 12:30:06 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote: >> I've had a look to the above issue and it's not the same, the failing build >> requireshttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/ repo >> which hasn't been build yet. Anyway to bypass ? > How it comes that it wasn't built yet? If it was not, we wouldn't have metadata > pointing at the non-existing RPMs, or? > > Pavel > I agree it probably has been built, I have no way to investigate or help more, but the copy of this repo is missing.
This may have been a EOL repo that was removed?
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2020-March/036649.html
Thanks for the link!
I'm still not sure, there must be something wrong. If the mirror(s) were correctly rsynced, there wouldn't be single moment in time when the metadata referenced non-existing files?
Jean-Marc, do you have link to the build?
I've suppressed it, but I've just tried to build my package again an the problem is over as there is no more link to old devtoolset-6 metadatas !
Hi Pavel,
This problem is back again, here is the link to the build :
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ligenix/enterprise-virtua...
Thanks for letting us know, I filled CentOS bug report: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17187
And perhaps we should invent some easy-to-tweak DNS mirror blacklist on builders (e.g. etc/hosts hacks). This is going to be discussed on Monday team meeting...
Hi,
The devtoolset-6 stack, non-existent in sclo-rh repository for epel-7-x86_64 chroot, is still required any progress here ?
JM
Pavel
JM
JM
Pavel
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.o...
*Jean-Marc LIGER* Chef du Service Informatique UFR de Médecine de Paris Centre 15 rue de l'Ecole de médecine 75270 PARIS CEDEX 06 +33 (0)1 53 10 46 82
https://www.facebook.com/univparis/ https://www.instagram.com/univ_paris/?hl=fr https://twitter.com/Univ_Paris https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5WhlXe1I_eRCtEx7cj3ZKg?fbclid=IwAR1vwGdU3uTudr9xzGkiXoNdg0tlasAeDl2lkkTP-cyEP_snhPMfdU_Oc9w
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.o...
Le 27/03/2020 à 08:04, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Thursday, March 26, 2020 11:09:21 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
Le 21/03/2020 à 17:26, Jean-Marc Liger a écrit :
Le 21/03/2020 à 16:57, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Saturday, March 21, 2020 12:08:52 AM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:35:08PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
Le 20/03/2020 à 13:27, Pavel Raiskup a écrit : > On Friday, March 20, 2020 12:30:06 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote: >> I've had a look to the above issue and it's not the same, the failing build >> requireshttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/ repo >> which hasn't been build yet. Anyway to bypass ? > How it comes that it wasn't built yet? If it was not, we wouldn't have metadata > pointing at the non-existing RPMs, or? > > Pavel > I agree it probably has been built, I have no way to investigate or help more, but the copy of this repo is missing.
This may have been a EOL repo that was removed?
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2020-March/036649.html
Thanks for the link!
I'm still not sure, there must be something wrong. If the mirror(s) were correctly rsynced, there wouldn't be single moment in time when the metadata referenced non-existing files?
Jean-Marc, do you have link to the build?
I've suppressed it, but I've just tried to build my package again an the problem is over as there is no more link to old devtoolset-6 metadatas !
Hi Pavel,
This problem is back again, here is the link to the build :
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ligenix/enterprise-virtua...
Thanks for letting us know, I filled CentOS bug report: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17187
And perhaps we should invent some easy-to-tweak DNS mirror blacklist on builders (e.g. etc/hosts hacks). This is going to be discussed on Monday team meeting...
Hi,
The devtoolset-6 stack, non-existent in sclo-rh repository for epel-7-x86_64 chroot, is still required, any progress here ?
JM
Pavel
JM
JM
Pavel
Le 09/04/2020 à 16:17, Jean-Marc Liger a écrit :
Le 27/03/2020 à 08:04, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Thursday, March 26, 2020 11:09:21 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
Le 21/03/2020 à 17:26, Jean-Marc Liger a écrit :
Le 21/03/2020 à 16:57, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Saturday, March 21, 2020 12:08:52 AM CET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 06:35:08PM +0100, Jean-Marc Liger wrote: > Le 20/03/2020 à 13:27, Pavel Raiskup a écrit : >> On Friday, March 20, 2020 12:30:06 PM CET Jean-Marc Liger wrote: >>> I've had a look to the above issue and it's not the same, the failing build >>> requireshttp://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/ repo >>> which hasn't been build yet. Anyway to bypass ? >> How it comes that it wasn't built yet? If it was not, we wouldn't have metadata >> pointing at the non-existing RPMs, or? >> >> Pavel >> > I agree it probably has been built, I have no way to investigate or help > more, but the copy of this repo is missing. This may have been a EOL repo that was removed?
https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-devel/2020-March/036649.html
Thanks for the link!
I'm still not sure, there must be something wrong. If the mirror(s) were correctly rsynced, there wouldn't be single moment in time when the metadata referenced non-existing files?
Jean-Marc, do you have link to the build?
I've suppressed it, but I've just tried to build my package again an the problem is over as there is no more link to old devtoolset-6 metadatas !
Hi Pavel,
This problem is back again, here is the link to the build :
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ligenix/enterprise-virtua...
Thanks for letting us know, I filled CentOS bug report: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17187
And perhaps we should invent some easy-to-tweak DNS mirror blacklist on builders (e.g. etc/hosts hacks). This is going to be discussed on Monday team meeting...
Hi,
The devtoolset-6 stack, non-existent in sclo-rh repository for epel-7-x86_64 chroot, is still required, any progress here ?
non-existent in sclo-rh repository for epel-7-aarch64, sorry for haven't been careful enough in my proofreading
JM
Pavel
JM
JM
Pavel
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.o...
*Jean-Marc LIGER* Chef du Service Informatique UFR de Médecine de Paris Centre 15 rue de l'Ecole de médecine 75270 PARIS CEDEX 06 +33 (0)1 53 10 46 82
https://www.facebook.com/univparis/ https://www.instagram.com/univ_paris/?hl=fr https://twitter.com/Univ_Paris https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5WhlXe1I_eRCtEx7cj3ZKg?fbclid=IwAR1vwGdU3uTudr9xzGkiXoNdg0tlasAeDl2lkkTP-cyEP_snhPMfdU_Oc9w
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 10:40:54 PM CEST Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
The devtoolset-6 stack, non-existent in sclo-rh repository for epel-7-x86_64 chroot, is still required, any progress here ?
non-existent in sclo-rh repository for epel-7-aarch64, sorry for haven't been careful enough in my proofreading
The problem before was that the cloudfronts mirror was broken (not non-existent). I need to see the link to build failure to judge.
Pavel
Le 11/04/2020 à 10:48, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 10:40:54 PM CEST Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
The devtoolset-6 stack, non-existent in sclo-rh repository for epel-7-x86_64 chroot, is still required, any progress here ?
non-existent in sclo-rh repository for epel-7-aarch64, sorry for haven't been careful enough in my proofreading
The problem before was that the cloudfronts mirror was broken (not non-existent). I need to see the link to build failure to judge.
The error is in the bug review, it's not jus about cloudfronts but all mirrors get the same:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17187
[FAILED] devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: No more mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success (85-86/86): devtools 62% [============ ] 82 kB/s | 46 MB 05:50 ETA Error: Error downloading packages: Cannot download devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: All mirrors were tried
And that's a consequence of the link below which lead to a 404 error:
http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/
JM
Pavel
copr-devel mailing list -- copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org To unsubscribe send an email to copr-devel-leave@lists.fedorahosted.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.o...
On Saturday, April 11, 2020 10:25:16 PM CEST Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
Le 11/04/2020 à 10:48, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 10:40:54 PM CEST Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
The devtoolset-6 stack, non-existent in sclo-rh repository for epel-7-x86_64 chroot, is still required, any progress here ?
non-existent in sclo-rh repository for epel-7-aarch64, sorry for haven't been careful enough in my proofreading
The problem before was that the cloudfronts mirror was broken (not non-existent). I need to see the link to build failure to judge.
The error is in the bug review, it's not jus about cloudfronts but all mirrors get the same:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17187
[FAILED] devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: No more mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success (85-86/86): devtools 62% [============ ] 82 kB/s | 46 MB 05:50 ETA Error: Error downloading packages: Cannot download devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: All mirrors were tried
I need to see new full logs (the original are already deleted) to see who brings devtoolset-6 into the dnf transaction... If it is the package itself, then it is package bug (the devtoolset is removed from mirrors). If the metadata/mock, it is broken mirror.
And that's a consequence of the link below which lead to a 404 error:
http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/
From what they told us, this is expected to not exist.
Pavel
Le 12/04/2020 à 08:15, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Saturday, April 11, 2020 10:25:16 PM CEST Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
Le 11/04/2020 à 10:48, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 10:40:54 PM CEST Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
The devtoolset-6 stack, non-existent in sclo-rh repository for epel-7-x86_64 chroot, is still required, any progress here ?
non-existent in sclo-rh repository for epel-7-aarch64, sorry for haven't been careful enough in my proofreading
The problem before was that the cloudfronts mirror was broken (not non-existent). I need to see the link to build failure to judge.
The error is in the bug review, it's not jus about cloudfronts but all mirrors get the same:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17187
[FAILED] devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: No more mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success (85-86/86): devtools 62% [============ ] 82 kB/s | 46 MB 05:50 ETA Error: Error downloading packages: Cannot download devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: All mirrors were tried
I need to see new full logs (the original are already deleted) to see who brings devtoolset-6 into the dnf transaction... If it is the package itself, then it is package bug (the devtoolset is removed from mirrors). If the metadata/mock, it is broken mirror.
I built the below package another time (which has no devtoolset BuildRequires). Fortunalty there is no link to devtoolset-6, so the problem is gone again.
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ligenix/enterprise-sandbo...
But to give you an example, this is a previous build I've done with Oracle devtool-6-aarch64 external repo enable to bypass the problem :
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/ligenix/enterprise-virtua...
JM
And that's a consequence of the link below which lead to a 404 error:
http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/
From what they told us, this is expected to not exist.
Pavel
*Jean-Marc LIGER* Chef du Service Informatique UFR de Médecine de Paris Centre 15 rue de l'Ecole de médecine 75270 PARIS CEDEX 06 +33 (0)1 53 10 46 82
https://www.facebook.com/univparis/ https://www.instagram.com/univ_paris/?hl=fr https://twitter.com/Univ_Paris https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC5WhlXe1I_eRCtEx7cj3ZKg?fbclid=IwAR1vwGdU3uTudr9xzGkiXoNdg0tlasAeDl2lkkTP-cyEP_snhPMfdU_Oc9w
Le 11/04/2020 à 10:48, Pavel Raiskup a écrit :
On Thursday, April 9, 2020 10:40:54 PM CEST Jean-Marc Liger wrote:
The devtoolset-6 stack, non-existent in sclo-rh repository for epel-7-x86_64 chroot, is still required, any progress here ?
non-existent in sclo-rh repository for epel-7-aarch64, sorry for haven't been careful enough in my proofreading
The problem before was that the cloudfronts mirror was broken (not non-existent). I need to see the link to build failure to judge.
The error is in the bug review, it's not jus about cloudfronts but all mirrors get the same:
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=17187
[FAILED] devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: No more mirrors to try - All mirrors were already tried without success (85-86/86): devtools 62% [============ ] 82 kB/s | 46 MB 05:50 ETA Error: Error downloading packages: Cannot download devtoolset-6/devtoolset-6-runtime-6.1-1.el7.aarch64.rpm: All mirrors were tried
And that's a consequence of the link below which lead to a 404 error:
http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/sclo/aarch64/rh/devtoolset-6/
JM
Pavel
copr-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
-
Jean-Marc Liger -
Jean-Marc Liger -
Kevin Fenzi -
Pavel Raiskup