devel February 2009

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

305 participants
316 discussions

Help needed with latex/R doc font issue
by Orion Poplawski 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

I'm trying to update R-lmtest to the latest release, but am having trouble during the documentation build step: * checking PDF version of manual ... ERROR LaTeX errors when creating PDF version. This typically indicates Rd problems. LaTeX errors found: ! Package textcomp Error: Symbol \textcurrency not provided by (textcomp) font family ptm in TS1 encoding. (textcomp) Default family used instead. See the textcomp package documentation for explanation. Now, the shipped docs are in ISO-8599 encoding, so I convert the to UTF-8 with: for x in lmtest/man/*.Rd do iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 < ${x} | tr -d '\r' > ${x}.utf-8 touch -r ${x} ${x}.utf-8 mv ${x}.utf-8 ${x} done This worked fine the last time I built the package (2008-06-25 for F-10). If I take out the iconv step, the documentation builds fine. Seems like a tex font is not getting installed that needs to be? BuildRequires: R-devel, tetex-latex, R-zoo Mock root contains: DEBUG util.py:250: fontconfig x86_64 2.6.0-3.fc10 fedora 183 k DEBUG util.py:250: fontconfig-devel x86_64 2.6.0-3.fc10 fedora 216 k DEBUG util.py:250: ghostscript-fonts noarch 5.50-19.fc10 fedora 812 k DEBUG util.py:250: libXfont x86_64 1.3.3-1.fc10 fedora 232 k DEBUG util.py:250: libfontenc x86_64 1.0.4-6.fc10 fedora 24 k DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-errata-fonts noarch 2007-5.fc11 fedora 3.7 k DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-fonts noarch 2007-26.fc10 fedora 56 M DEBUG util.py:250: urw-fonts noarch 2.4-6.fc10 fedora 3.2 M DEBUG util.py:250: xorg-x11-font-utils x86_64 1:7.2-6.fc10 fedora 79 k DEBUG util.py:250: tex-preview noarch 11.85-7.fc9 fedora 52 k DEBUG util.py:250: texinfo x86_64 4.13a-1.fc11 fedora 885 k DEBUG util.py:250: texlive x86_64 2007-39.fc11 fedora 2.2 M DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-dvips x86_64 2007-39.fc11 fedora 197 k DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-latex x86_64 2007-39.fc11 fedora 82 k DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf noarch 2007-26.fc10 fedora 3.5 M DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-dvips noarch 2007-26.fc10 fedora 378 k DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-errata noarch 2007-5.fc11 fedora 3.6 k DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-errata-dvips noarch 2007-5.fc11 fedora 3.6 k DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-errata-fonts noarch 2007-5.fc11 fedora 3.7 k DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-errata-latex noarch 2007-5.fc11 fedora 3.7 k DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-fonts noarch 2007-26.fc10 fedora 56 M DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-texmf-latex noarch 2007-26.fc10 fedora 6.0 M DEBUG util.py:250: texlive-utils x86_64 2007-39.fc11 fedora 236 k -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com

7 14

Fedora 11 Mass Rebuild Status
by Jesse Keating 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

Well the initial pass of the rebuild has finished! 6217 completed builds. Of those 6117 need to be tagged. Down to 450 failed builds that need attention. 512 builds that still need to be done or otherwise accounted for (like dead packages that haven't been blocked). 76 failures in the build submission path that need to be examined. Extremely impressive for 4~ days of work. In just a few minutes I'll be kicking off the tag submissions, which will likely completely overload the buildsystem for at least an hour, although I'm just guessing. We've never submitted this many tag requests with this many active builders with their new algorithms for taking tasks. The tag requests should be without email to save some spam. Syncing rawhide tomorrow will be quite slow and painful. I'll post a raw unbuilt list to go along with our failure list a little later today and I'll be working through the packages that didn't quite make it through the submission process. All in all though I'd consider this quite successful! -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating _______________________________________________ Fedora-devel-announce mailing list Fedora-devel-announce(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce

3 5

Packages hardcoded to build 'i386'
by Jesse Keating 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

Since we now build i586, packages that are hardcoded to build i386 will not produce a build. I just so happened to have a checkout of everything and ran a little suggested grep to find such problems. Not many of them, but I don't have the time today to look through them. Anybody want to give it a shot? http://fpaste.org/paste/4675 -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

3 4

Re: Two Python packages seek loving maintainers
by Adam Miller 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

I would be interested in both. If you orphan them in pkgdb, I will go ahead and pick them up and I'm a big fan of upstream involvement :) -Adam (From my G1) On Feb 26, 2009 7:34 PM, "Andrew Price" <andy(a)andrewprice.me.uk> wrote: I find myself in a position which leaves me little opportunity for taking care of my Fedora packages at the moment. I have two packages, - pybackpack: a Gnome GUI backup program, and - python-twyt: a Twitter API library and commandline client which I would like to request assistance with, or somebody willing to take over one, or both of them. I'm the upstream developer for both packages so you will have my full cooperation and attention if/when any issues arise which require upstream attention. Searching bugzilla returns "zarro boogs" for both packages, so they're either well-written, or rarely-used *ahem* :-) They're still both in active development so bugs will get fixed upstream and I'll still take an active interest in how they're progressing in Fedora but I won't get in the way of the new maintainers. Any takers? -- Andy Price -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

4 4

Rebuild dependency issue
by Orion Poplawski 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

Just saw this in the plplot build failure: DEBUG util.py:256: hal-0.5.12-21.20090226git.fc11.i586 from build has depsolving problems DEBUG util.py:256: --> Missing Dependency: dmidecode >= 2.7 is needed by package hal-0.5.12-21.20090226git.fc11.i586 (build) DEBUG util.py:256: Error: Missing Dependency: dmidecode >= 2.7 is needed by package hal-0.5.12-21.20090226git.fc11.i586 (build) -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com

2 1

Mass Rebuild Failures Report
by Jesse Keating 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

I've created a script[1] to find the latest failed build that hasn't yet been fixed during our mass rebuild. The output is an html page broken down by packager. Each package listed under the packager is a link to the latest failed build attempt. Shortly I'll setup a cron job to keep this list updated every 10 minutes or so. http://jkeating.fedorapeople.org/failed-f11-rebuilds.html If you have a package on this list, please fix the build error and do a normal build (make build). Your package will go into dist-f11 and this script will see that it has been fixed and no longer report it. Since builds are still ongoing, more failures may be added to the list. Please check back often. [1]: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=releng;a=blob;f=scripts/find-failures.py… -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating _______________________________________________ Fedora-devel-announce mailing list Fedora-devel-announce(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce

9 11

Re: [pkgdb] xulrunner: oliver has requested commit
by Oliver Falk 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

Fedora PackageDB wrote: > oliver has requested the commit acl on xulrunner (Fedora 10) > > To make changes to this package see: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/xulrunner > I want to add patches for alpha. Of course I'm not going to break primary arches :-) Thx. -of

4 4

any other problems with fontforge?
by Orcan Ogetbil 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

serafettin-cartoon-fonts failed the mass rebuild with a timeout error of 86400 seconds = 1 day. On my own computer (Athlon X2 3000MHz), I could reproduce this problem. The build takes an unrealistically long time. During this build serafettin used fontforge-20081224-2. However, using fontforge-20081215-2, the build can be finished on the same computer within 230 seconds. I was wondering if this is a serafettin issue or a fontforge issue. Did anyone experience problems with the latest fontforge? Orcan PS: Failed tasks: ------------- Task 1179361 on xenbuilder4.fedora.phx.redhat.com Task Type: build (dist-f11-rebuild, /cvs/pkgs:rpms/serafettin-cartoon-fonts/devel:serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0_5-2_fc11) Task 1182915 on x86-1.fedora.phx.redhat.com Task Type: buildArch (serafettin-cartoon-fonts-0.5-2.fc11.src.rpm, noarch) logs: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1182915&name=build.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1182915&name=root.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1182915&name=state.log

2 1

Fedora 11 Mass Rebuilds
by Jesse Keating 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

In just a few minutes, I will begin the scripted rebuild of every Fedora package in rawhide (dist-f11). See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild for details. Most importantly, if you as a maintainer wish to build your own package for this rebuild instead of having the script do it, follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild#How_do_I_opt_out_of_t… The script will be doing things one package at a time, so even though the script will be starting in a few minutes (and it'll be working alphanumerically in descending order), you still have a window to opt-out of the build before the script gets to your package. I will be announcing the progress of the rebuilds over the next few days. It is important to note that the results of the rebuilds will not be showing up in rawhide (and koji buildroots) immediately. Instead they will be contained on the side until the script is finished building things, and they will be tagged into rawhide (dist-f11) en masse. If your build was started after 2009-02-23 18:31:07 UTC, the script will not touch your package, as that is after all the proper parts were in place for this rebuild. Let the games begin! -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating _______________________________________________ Fedora-devel-announce mailing list Fedora-devel-announce(a)redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-announce

21 37

rawhide report: 20090227 changes
by Fedora compose checker 27 Feb '09

27 Feb '09

Compose started at Fri Feb 27 06:01:03 UTC 2009

2 1

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
32
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel February 2009