devel April 2017

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

148 participants
259 discussions

Nonresponsive packager [xpra]
by Antonio Trande 04 May '17

04 May '17

Hello. Packager of 'xpra' package is inactive since some months and xpra is not updated yet. Does anyone know how to contact him? Bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411006 -- -- Antonio Trande sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org See my vCard.

2 1

[RFC] delta-repository-metadata
by Igor Gnatenko 03 May '17

03 May '17

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hello users and developers, We had presented deltametadata project at DevConf.CZ 2017[0], goal of this project is to minimize bandwidth required on clients to update repository metadata (repomd.xml, primary.xml, etc.) which would improve user experience with DNF. So, we have DNF plugin which acts How to try it? 1. dnf -y copr enable @rpm-software-management/deltamd 2. dnf -y install dnf-plugin-zsync If something doesn't work, look into /var/log/dnf.log. We would like you to try it out and give feedback, it is very important for us! Just send it as reply to this message.. P.S. F25 and above are supported [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6uWxg3yMmw - -- Regards, lab-q Red Hat -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlkCJAoACgkQaVcUvRu8 X0wrGg/+Lvb/up8swQR6Nd9BacvrubhgELvOcOIsv/69aMPqe9cDqmAKUr33AWik zUWbAwpkS79BLLKjoxHTxR379Ubmj5mCWyuufg/HCgeCHOZwIBEQzqrBjwKMsIN+ ts6Qk7mo1bsgS3xozx/tRH+N1xhx1O+UInsDxS1qKQ5KIBntf/e8ZrgFL/fbjHYx /JVlz2p44tZxMHCsZP/hJv+DKV+AaY9/NcvLh2KBvpj75h8cVA3RkSE85YgNFNyD GJRjkzv+swmwWXVZMd0XNiCKKXn+qGooMsrrjAmbousG/Gd/DmTQekuO/hIkGZ+g rjSCPRjLXe+utD2lnqK5aWm1nJvaEUTjTAWKYAhV0mAAT/Y4Y8S2XcsdY6EXxiW6 iSYmXa4Rz4rTYiZ+K2XXYoEIGDVSN8C5lQyYy4Qqg2lnAyKDZ1567s/4fCz/IYpB rpDv+4jX1o3C8RY0XUuCYkt+/IpVH+1/DfkhWJCG2rNLDpnq5R7N4cryJg0MClW1 PUw24GJFbIwWnl6he0n+ShJ6wzZvd2jHwFBVj5a/718wech3YnIfSHf/xJeIE6Nn dK716wgmHUPyjCwk/cWQWdj5x99lMiDZJIXXFTu0zGLxXcHzz9MnZjDCv219u6XU Vj0dCKWa3SoLml+zmRkqb+T4acyyXlwPBahRFXN3qBhFpqoA/MY= =5ar8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 3

Re: Split translations to noarch packages?
by Tomasz Kłoczko 02 May '17

02 May '17

On 27 April 2017 at 21:54, Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote: > Am 27.04.2017 um 21:50 schrieb Tomasz Kłoczko: >> >> OK so what kind of problem solves those changes? Can I have look on some >> bugzilla entry? > > split packages where it *really* matters instead create thousands of small > rpm packages where the metadata and overhead is much larger than the few > bytes in the standard package? So far *only* argument was that his split may save ~1GB on ftp server. [mode=sarcastic] If Fedora Foundation is in so big financial troubles I can donate 1GB SD card out of my pocket (probably 2-3 pounds with delivery to US). Just please give me address where this card needs to be delivered. [/mode] kloczek -- Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH

5 14

Re: DNF translation
by Rafal Luzynski 02 May '17

02 May '17

I think that developers should be asked this question. As DNF is a software originally made by Fedora people I think it's correct to crosspost to devel@fpo hoping to get an answer from the DNF authors or at least from somebody who can explain what they meant. Just to summarize the story: somebody please explain us what is "a payload factory" in this context. Regards, Rafal 29.04.2017 03:07 Daniel López <protoanima(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > > > sometimes payload is used as capacity > > > > i think it means the number exceeds the capacity for , lets say, certain > number of packages. > > > > Not really sure. Have you solved it already? > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------- > De: Máximo Castañeda <mcrcctm(a)gmail.com> > Enviado: miércoles, 12 de abril de 2017 07:30:11 a. m. > Para: Fedora Translation Project List > Asunto: Re: DNF translation > > FWIW, I've translated it to something that back in English would be > like "no data manager found for %s". From the code[1], it looks like > there are different types of repos or downloadable "stuff" (payload), > that can each have a different "manager" (factory), such as a normal > rpm and a deltarpm. > > [1] > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/blob/master/dnf/repo.py#L104 > https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/blob/master/dnf/repo.py#L104 > > 2017-04-12 13:39 GMT+02:00 Zdenek Chmelar <chmelarz(a)gmail.com>: > > Hello all > > > > The DNF project has one sentence which I'm not able to reasonably > > translate. I think I do not understand the sentence meaning properly. I > > have checked French and German translations in order to understand the > > meaning better but those languages didn't translate that sentence yet. > > > > So what's the magic sentence I speak about? > > "no matching payload factory for %s" (message with number #547) > > > > If anyone could explain what means "payload factory" in relation to DNF, I > > would be very thankful ;-) > > > > Thanks > > Z. > > _______________________________________________ > > trans mailing list -- trans(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to trans-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > _______________________________________________ > trans mailing list -- trans(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to trans-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > > _______________________________________________ > trans mailing list -- trans(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to trans-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org >

2 1

Re: What is your opinion on "sudo pip" fix for Fedora 27?
by Charalampos Stratakis 01 May '17

01 May '17

Forwarding to fedora-devel as well Charalampos Stratakis Associate Software Engineer Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michal Cyprian" <mcyprian(a)redhat.com> To: python-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2017 11:19:00 AM Subject: What is your opinion on "sudo pip" fix for Fedora 27? At the present time, running sudo pip3 in Fedora is not safe. Pip shares its installation directory with dnf, can remove dnf-managed files and generally break the Python 3 interpreter. Our first attempt to make sudo pip safe on Fedora [0] was based on using a different binary (/usr/libexec/system-python) for RPM packaging purposes and changing the behavior of /usr/bin/python3 (and pip that uses its settings) to install under /usr/local by default. Switching all the Python 3 packages to system-python turned out to be much more problematic than expected and we had to postpone the Change for F27. We decided to try a different approach. The main idea is to detect an ongoing RPM build and modify the behavior of the Python 3 executable only when in normal user environment so that RPM builds won't be affected at all. The adjustment of the behavior can be done on different levels. The first option is to set the sys.prefix variable to /usr/local when the interpreter is initialized. This will affect all the install methods, but the solution can cause some problems in applications that rely on the value of sys.prefix. A prototype of this implementation can be seen here [1]. The other possibility is to limit the pip install location change to distutils and pip [2]. This is the "safer" option, but does not cover all corner cases. For example, Python software built locally using cmake or similar tools will be installed into /usr/lib and can conflict with system tools. Debian chose to implement similar solution. I would like to ask which solution would work for your applications better, and what is in your opinion the right way to go. I will appreciate any costructive comments or ideas on how to improve these patches. If you want to check some specific use-case you can use the images docker.io/mcyprian/sudo_pip_sys_prefix and docker.io/mcyprian/sudo_pip_install_prefix to try out the two mentioned implementations. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Making_sudo_pip_safe?rd=User:Torsava… [1] https://github.com/mcyprian/python3/commit/6077c96460c03ddc334bae654fffcce4… [2] https://github.com/mcyprian/python3/commit/ac2f266a90871d67ba8d0b70d2b0ebe4… Michal Cyprian _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org

8 18

OpenVPN, OpenSSL and Fedora 26+
by David Sommerseth 01 May '17

01 May '17

Hi, This is actually just a very late heads-up about challenges with OpenVPN in Fedora 26. Fedora is moving towards OpenSSL v1.1, which is in my opinion a sane and good step forward. Unfortunately, that gives OpenVPN a real challenge. The OpenSSL v1.1 support is not completed. Patches have been sent to the upstream devel mailing list for review, but only half of them have been processed and applied so far. So, to be able to provide OpenVPN in Fedora 26 it was decided to switch to mbed TLS instead of OpenSSL (which OpenVPN also supports). That have revealed several issues: - mbed TLS 2.3+ does by default not support certificates hashes "older" than SHA1. And RSA keys must be 2048 bits or more. This have been fixed by a couple of additional patches on top of the upstream OpenVPN code base. It supports now RSA keys of 1024 bits or more. In addition for OpenSSL support of the OPENSSL_ENABLE_MD5_VERIFY, a quirk have been added to also enable MD5 support if that environment variable have been set. - mbed TLS build in Fedora lacked PKCS#11 support. This have been resolved. But there are concerns how well this plays along with another dependency OpenVPN have, pkcs11-helper. This is being investigated and tested. Feel free to help out on bz #1432152 if you depend on PKCS#11/Smart Card functionality. Your feedback is valuable! - mbed TLS completely lacks support for PKCS#12 files. Now, there is kind of an alternative by using compat-openssl-10. But that does not play well with pkcs11-helper; which is compiled against OpenSSL v1.1. Currently the plan is to stay with mbed TLS support until PKCS#11 support is fully confirmed working or not working at all. If not working, we can at least move to compat-openssl10 without PKCS#11 support, which enables PKCS#12 support again. If PKCS#11 support works with mbed TLS, then we will stay on mbed TLS for now as I value that support more important than PKCS#12. Once OpenVPN have released a version with full OpenSSL v1.1 support (or at least have all the needed patches reviewed and applied to their upstream git repos), then I will switch back to the default openssl package again. This is far from ideal. But I do consider this the best compromise than not having an OpenVPN package in Fedora 26 at all. For those of you having PKCS#12 files, there is a kind of workaround where you can split up that file into CA, Certificate and Private Key PEM files - which OpenVPN can use directly. $ openssl pkcs12 -nokeys -cacerts -in $PKCS12FILE > ca-cert.pem $ openssl pkcs12 -nokeys -clcerts -in $PKCS12FILE > cert.pem $ openssl pkcs12 -nocerts -nodes -in $PKCS12FILE > private-key.pem If switching from '-nodes' with for example '-aes256' on the last line, the private key will be encrypted and password protected; similar to what your PKCS#12 files may already use today. I am sorry for not having sent this heads-up earlier. I took over package maintenance mid-March, and I've taken this package through a very much needed overhaul to align the packaging with improvements in the upstream packaging. The previous maintainers have done a good job keeping this package alive, but the gap against upstream began to be a bit too big. There are still a few things which needs to be ironed out. But once the mbed TLS/OpenSSL issue and a few other more minor issues gets resolved, I'd say we're pretty much in a reasonable shape. If you have questions, issues or comments ... feel free to reach out! -- kind regards, David Sommerseth

3 3

Failed to push updates to stable
by Kalpa Welivitigoda 30 Apr '17

30 Apr '17

Hi, I was trying to push an update to stable and received a mail with this notification [1], anyone experienced a similar response recently, seems the version comparison fails. Also wonder why fc24 update is being tried to push to fc25. [1] https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/3e2dfd96-2d3f-11e7-9745-5… -- Best Regards, Kalpa Welivitigoda +65 82265081 http://about.me/callkalpa

2 2

mc 4.8.19-1 broken
by josef radinger 30 Apr '17

30 Apr '17

Hi Could someone with write-access to mc solve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442842 we currently have a situation where users accidentally might delete data. The situation is a mess. mc 4.8.19-1 changed from curses to slang and now several keybindings are plain wrong for at least fedora 25 and maybe fedora 24, too. yours josef

2 1

Fedora 26-20170430.n.0 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 30 Apr '17

30 Apr '17

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 18/116 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 88964 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/88964 ID: 88978 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/88978 ID: 88979 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/88979 ID: 88994 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/88994 ID: 89007 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89007 ID: 89008 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89008 ID: 89010 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89010 ID: 89024 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89024 ID: 89025 Test: x86_64 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89025 ID: 89026 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89026 ID: 89044 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89044 ID: 89057 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89057 ID: 89060 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89060 ID: 89062 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89062 ID: 89065 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89065 ID: 89069 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89069 ID: 89070 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89070 ID: 89071 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89071 ID: 89072 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89072 ID: 89073 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89073 ID: 89079 Test: i386 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89079 ID: 89080 Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89080 ID: 89090 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89090 ID: 89091 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89091 ID: 89092 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89092 Soft failed openQA tests: 13/23 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 88973 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/88973 ID: 88974 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/88974 ID: 89077 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89077 ID: 89078 Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89078 ID: 89081 Test: i386 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89081 ID: 89082 Test: i386 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89082 ID: 89083 Test: i386 universal install_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89083 ID: 89084 Test: i386 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89084 ID: 89085 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89085 ID: 89086 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89086 ID: 89087 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89087 ID: 89088 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89088 ID: 89089 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89089 Passed openQA tests: 90/116 (x86_64), 4/23 (i386) Skipped openQA tests: 9 of 141 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

1 0

Fedora Rawhide-20170430.n.0 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 30 Apr '17

30 Apr '17

Missing expected images: Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64 Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Failed openQA tests: 71/116 (x86_64), 20/23 (i386) ID: 89293 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89293 ID: 89294 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89294 ID: 89295 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89295 ID: 89302 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89302 ID: 89311 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89311 ID: 89313 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89313 ID: 89314 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89314 ID: 89315 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89315 ID: 89316 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89316 ID: 89317 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89317 ID: 89320 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89320 ID: 89329 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89329 ID: 89330 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89330 ID: 89331 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89331 ID: 89332 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89332 ID: 89333 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89333 ID: 89335 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89335 ID: 89336 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89336 ID: 89347 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89347 ID: 89348 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89348 ID: 89350 Test: x86_64 Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89350 ID: 89351 Test: x86_64 Atomic-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89351 ID: 89352 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89352 ID: 89353 Test: x86_64 universal install_anaconda_text URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89353 ID: 89355 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89355 ID: 89356 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89356 ID: 89357 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89357 ID: 89358 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89358 ID: 89359 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89359 ID: 89360 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89360 ID: 89361 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89361 ID: 89362 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89362 ID: 89363 Test: x86_64 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89363 ID: 89364 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89364 ID: 89365 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89365 ID: 89366 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89366 ID: 89367 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89367 ID: 89368 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89368 ID: 89369 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89369 ID: 89370 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89370 ID: 89371 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89371 ID: 89372 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89372 ID: 89373 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89373 ID: 89374 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89374 ID: 89375 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89375 ID: 89376 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89376 ID: 89377 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89377 ID: 89378 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89378 ID: 89379 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89379 ID: 89380 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89380 ID: 89381 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89381 ID: 89382 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89382 ID: 89383 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89383 ID: 89384 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89384 ID: 89385 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89385 ID: 89386 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89386 ID: 89387 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89387 ID: 89388 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89388 ID: 89389 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89389 ID: 89390 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89390 ID: 89391 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89391 ID: 89392 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89392 ID: 89393 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_hdd URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89393 ID: 89400 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89400 ID: 89403 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89403 ID: 89404 Test: x86_64 universal install_updates_img_local URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89404 ID: 89405 Test: x86_64 universal install_shrink_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89405 ID: 89406 Test: x86_64 universal install_shrink_ntfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89406 ID: 89407 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89407 ID: 89408 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89408 ID: 89409 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89409 ID: 89410 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89410 ID: 89411 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89411 ID: 89412 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89412 ID: 89415 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89415 ID: 89416 Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89416 ID: 89417 Test: i386 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89417 ID: 89418 Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89418 ID: 89419 Test: i386 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89419 ID: 89420 Test: i386 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89420 ID: 89421 Test: i386 universal install_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89421 ID: 89422 Test: i386 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89422 ID: 89423 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89423 ID: 89424 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89424 ID: 89425 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89425 ID: 89426 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89426 ID: 89427 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89427 ID: 89429 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89429 ID: 89430 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89430 ID: 89431 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89431 ID: 89433 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/89433 Passed openQA tests: 30/116 (x86_64), 3/23 (i386) Skipped openQA tests: 15 of 139 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel April 2017