I was recently surprised that `dnf install boost` brings in python2.
It is like that because boost brings in bost-python and that is python2
ATM. I've reported it as a bug, because it bugs me :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1569483
However Jonathan Wakely (the boost maintainer) says this needs broader
audience.
So I'm asking here on devel:
Should the 'boost' metapackage install boost-python at all? If so, what
versions?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/389-ds-base-remove-686
Owner(s):
* Mark Reynolds <mreynolds at redhat dot com>
389-ds-base does not work properly on i686 hardware in regards to atomic types.
== Detailed description ==
389-ds project have found an issue which causes system instability on
all versions of 1.4.x of the server on i686 platform. This is a
hardware limitation of the platform related to how we consume atomic
types. This may lead to thread unsafety and other issues.
- FreeIPA server will not be available on i686 due to this
- slapi-nis set of plugins will not be available on i686 due to this
- Upgrade of i686 instance of Fedora with FreeIPA server will not be
possible without fully uninstalling FreeIPA replica
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
This only requires a change to spec file to exclude i686
* Other developers:
N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Release engineering:
#6894: https://pagure.io/releng/issues/6894
** List of deliverables:
N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Policies and guidelines:
N/A (not a System Wide Change)
* Trademark approval:
N/A (not needed for this Change)
--
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
Hi all,
just wanted to let you know about trivial experiment [1] with systemd in
container. Non-privileged systemd can now pretty fine run in docker
container (tested on Fedora 27 box).
Could we support this under fedora-kickstarts, or as a layered image?
[1] https://github.com/praiskup/systemd-container
Pavel
Hi All,
I'm sending this to the fedora-kernel and -devel lists
both to get the kernel team aware of this and because it
is not entirely clear to me how to best deal with this.
I guess we should get this added to the release-notes /
common-bugs page for F28, but I'm not sure what the
procedure is for that ?
I've just become aware that at least for some users
the use of SATA LPM in F28 causes the Lenovo 50
series laptops (confirmed X250, T450s G50-80) freeze/
hang hard under certain conditions when using SATA
LPM, independent of the disk used (*).
This is currently being tracked in:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571330
A known workaround is to add: "ahci.mobile_lpm_policy=0"
to the kernel boot command line.
Can someone help me to get this documented? Once we've
figured out what is going on I hope to be able to fix this
with a kernel update, but people may still need the
workaround to install Fedora 28.
Also if people are using Fedora 28 on a 50 series Lenovo
laptop without issues, please let me know. 3 independent
reports points to a common problem, but maybe there is
some other factor in play.
Regards,
Hans
*) So blacklisting disks by their model string which
is the normal way to workaround LPM issues does
not work.
I am orphaning the packages:
- rubygem-ronn
- trac-code-comments-plugin
...as I no longer have a need for them and have been unable to find
the time to properly care for them and update them.
These are mostly easy-to-care-for packages, but they are starting to
accumulate some bugs that need dusting off:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=rubygem-ronn&list_id=87…
-Ricky
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2018-04-30
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We've finished the main testing on Fedora 28 now, but let's get
together and check on any final things that need doing before release,
and look ahead to Fedora 29.
If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this
email and suggest them! Thanks.
== Proposed Agenda Topics ==
1. Previous meeting follow-up
2. Fedora 28 status, final planning
3. Fedora 29 initial thoughts
4. Test Day and onboarding status
5. Open floor
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
test-announce mailing list -- test-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I am currently rebuilding about 1000 packages in Rawhide that were not
properly rebuilt in the last mass rebuild or failed to build. So if you
wonder why I rebuilt your package, this is why. Since it also seems that
the bug reports for the last mass rebuild are lacking the log files, I
might rebuild some more packages to get the log files when I proceed to
file proper bug reports. Afterwards we will re-start a process to
clean-up long time FTBFS packages. The progress is tracked in the
following FESCo issue: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1877
There are currently 797 bugs open for the last mass rebuild (this number
will go up), please fix your packages at your earliest convenience:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1555378&hide_resolved…
Kind regards
Till