devel July 2019

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

227 participants
279 discussions

Duplicate FTBFS bugs?
by Richard W.M. Jones 31 Jul '19

31 Jul '19

Seems like some script is being run a second time and is filing duplicate FTBFS bugs (unless there's some difference in these bugs which I'm not able to discern): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735387 & https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1734855 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1734862 & https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735393 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1734863 & https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735394 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/

2 1

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-08-01 16:00 UTC)
by James Antill 31 Jul '19

31 Jul '19

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2019-08-01 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): ================= Day: Thursday ================== 2019-08-01 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2019-08-01 12:00 EDT --> US/Eastern <-- 2019-08-01 16:00 UTC UTC 2019-08-01 17:00 BST Europe/London 2019-08-01 18:00 CEST Europe/Berlin 2019-08-01 18:00 CEST Europe/Paris 2019-08-01 21:30 IST Asia/Calcutta ---------------- New Day: Friday ----------------- 2019-08-02 00:00 HKT Asia/Hong_Kong 2019-08-02 00:00 +08 Asia/Singapore 2019-08-02 01:00 JST Asia/Tokyo 2019-08-02 02:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting = Followups = #topic #902 Cleanup & enhance spec files .fpc 902 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/902 #topic #904 Caret versioning .fpc 904 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/904 #topic #907 Which %__foo macros for executables are acceptable? .fpc 907 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/907 #topic #909 Suggest that linting/measuring-coverage is not for %check .fpc 909 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/909 = New business = #topic #914 Automatic R runtime dependencies .fpc 914 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/914 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can: * Reply to this e-mail * File a new ticket at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee * E-mail me directly * Bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

1 0

Fedora-Rawhide-20190729.n.0 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 31 Jul '19

31 Jul '19

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 4 of 45 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 21/147 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20190728.n.1): ID: 427398 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427398 ID: 427399 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427399 ID: 427436 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427436 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20190728.n.1): ID: 427345 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso mediakit_repoclosure URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427345 ID: 427369 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427369 ID: 427370 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427370 ID: 427382 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427382 ID: 427385 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427385 ID: 427394 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427394 ID: 427400 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427400 ID: 427402 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427402 ID: 427403 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427403 ID: 427464 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427464 ID: 427465 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427465 ID: 427467 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427467 ID: 427470 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427470 ID: 427471 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427471 ID: 427472 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427472 ID: 427475 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427475 ID: 427476 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427476 ID: 427478 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427478 ID: 427479 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427479 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/147 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20190728.n.1): ID: 427351 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427351 Passed openQA tests: 109/147 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Rawhide-20190728.n.1): ID: 427350 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427350 ID: 427358 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427358 ID: 427415 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427415 ID: 427429 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427429 Skipped gating openQA tests: 4/147 (x86_64) Old skipped gating tests (same test skipped in Fedora-Rawhide-20190728.n.1): ID: 427374 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_update_cli **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427374 ID: 427375 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_system_logging **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427375 ID: 427377 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_terminal **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427377 ID: 427378 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427378 Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 13 of 149 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default: 1 services(s) added since previous compose: pcscd.service Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427081#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427335#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi: 1 services(s) added since previous compose: pcscd.service Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427083#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427337#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload: Used mem changed from 782 MiB to 896 MiB System load changed from 1.76 to 1.34 Average CPU usage changed from 69.84761905 to 16.43333333 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427132#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427386#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi: 1 services(s) added since previous compose: dbus-:1.6-org.freedesktop.problems@0.service loaded active running dbus-:1.6-org.freedesktop.problems@0.service 1 services(s) removed since previous compose: dbus-:1.7-org.freedesktop.problems@0.service loaded active running dbus-:1.7-org.freedesktop.problems@0.service System load changed from 0.58 to 0.43 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427133#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427387#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde: 1 services(s) added since previous compose: pcscd.service System load changed from 0.39 to 0.68 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427193#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/427447#downloads x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi peak memory: 1184MiB (98% of previous compose peak) x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check peak memory: 1196MiB (99% of previous compose peak) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

3 2

dnf & rpm-devel both seem to be uninstallable in the Rawhide buildroot
by Richard W.M. Jones 31 Jul '19

31 Jul '19

The error is: DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Error: DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Problem 1: package rpm-devel-4.15.0-0.beta.2.fc31.1.x86_64 requires librpmsign.so.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - package rpm-devel-4.15.0-0.beta.2.fc31.1.x86_64 requires rpm-sign-libs(x86-64) = 4.15.0-0.beta.2.fc31.1, but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides libimaevm.so.0()(64bit) needed by rpm-sign-libs-4.15.0-0.beta.2.fc31.1.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Problem 2: package dnf-4.2.7-3.fc31.noarch requires python3-dnf = 4.2.7-3.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - package python3-dnf-4.2.7-3.fc31.noarch requires python3-rpm >= 4.14.0, but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides libimaevm.so.0()(64bit) needed by python3-rpm-4.15.0-0.beta.2.fc31.1.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: Problem 3: package python3-dnf-plugins-core-4.0.7-2.fc31.noarch requires python3-dnf >= 4.2.1, but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - package dnf-plugins-core-4.0.7-2.fc31.noarch requires python3-dnf-plugins-core = 4.0.7-2.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - package python3-dnf-4.2.7-3.fc31.noarch requires python3-rpm >= 4.14.0, but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - conflicting requests DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: - nothing provides libimaevm.so.0()(64bit) needed by python3-rpm-4.15.0-0.beta.2.fc31.1.x86_64 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html

3 5

s390x rawhide issues?
by Tom Callaway 31 Jul '19

31 Jul '19

One of my packages (alienarena) fails to build in rawhide on s390x (and only that arch), but the build log shows it never even starts. When I look at the root log, I see this: DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: error: unpacking of archive failed on file /builddir/build/SOURCES/alienarena-7.71.0-svn5638.tar.xz;5d41b327: cpio: read failed - Inappropriate ioctl for device DEBUG util.py:585: BUILDSTDERR: error: /builddir/build/originals/alienarena-7.71.0-3.fc31.src.rpm cannot be installed Is something unhappy on s390x on rawhide? Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=36706646 Thanks in advance, Tom

4 3

FedoraRespin-30-updates-20190730.0 compose check report
by Fedora compose checker 31 Jul '19

31 Jul '19

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/27 (x86_64) ID: 428120 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/428120 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/27 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 428103 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/428103 Passed openQA tests: 25/27 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose

1 0

Mock - signal reaction
by Jan Buchmaier 31 Jul '19

31 Jul '19

Now I'm working on signal SIGTERM handling and I would like to kill all processes related to the main mock process. What do you think is it a good idea to kill all processes, or do we want to kill the main process only? And what about SIGINT so-called KeyInterrupt in python? Same reaction?

3 6

Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Simply reclaim disk space in Anaconda
by Ben Cotton 31 Jul '19

31 Jul '19

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Anaconda_Reclaim_Disk_Space == Summary == The installer shows the Resize Disk Space dialog to reclaim disk space for the automatic partitioning in the graphical user interface. The Anaconda team would like to replace this dialog with a simple list of predefined choices. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Vponcova| Vendula Poncova]] * Email: vponcova(a)redhat.com == Detailed Description == The installer shows the Resize Disk Space dialog to reclaim disk space for the automatic partitioning in the graphical user interface. The Anaconda team would like to replace this dialog with the following list of choices: * Use all disk space * Use free space available for use * Replace existing Linux system(s) * Shrink or remove existing partitions The first three options will redirect users to the Installation Summary screen. The automatic partitioning will be configured based on the selected action. The last option will redirect users to the Manual Partitioning screen. Users can shrink or remove existing partitions, automatically create new partitions and leave the screen. The Manual Partitioning screen supports all actions of the Resize Disk Space dialog, so it doesn't make sense to have two user interfaces with the same functionality. == Benefit to Fedora == Simple predefined choices should improve the user experience for users, who are not interested in shrinking or removing specific partitions. Beginners can use all or free disk space without other interaction. Advanced users can quickly reinstall their systems and virtual machines. == Scope == * Proposal owners: Implement the new dialog window for the graphical user interface. The support for the dialog actions is already implemented for the text user interface and kickstart installations. It is a very small and isolated change. * Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change) == Upgrade/compatibility impact == N/A (not a System Wide Change) == How To Test == N/A (not a System Wide Change) == User Experience == During the Fedora installation, it will be easier to set up the automatic partitioning in the graphical user interface. Users can choose with one click to use all disk space, all free space or to replace existing Linux systems. These options are supported also in the text user interface and kickstart files, so users might be already familiar with them. Advanced users can choose to shrink or remove existing partitions. They will be redirected to the Manual Partitioning screen, where they can delete and shrink partitions and automatically generate partitions for the new installation. However, users have much more flexibility at this point. They can create a fully customized configuration without having to revisit the Installation Destination screen. == Dependencies == N/A (not a System Wide Change) == Contingency Plan == * Contingency mechanism: Revert the changes in Anaconda. * Contingency deadline: Beta Freeze * Blocks release? No * Blocks product? No == Documentation == N/A (not a System Wide Change) -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis

9 11

wine/dxvk: Help with testing
by Frantisek Zatloukal 31 Jul '19

31 Jul '19

Hi, I've proposed some packaging changes [0] to Fedora wine package. TLDR: It splits d3d libraries into subpackages and lays groundwork for future dxvk packaging [1]. Details are in the PR. *What is DXVK?* Vulkan-based D3D11 and D3D10 implementation for Linux / Wine. In short, you can replace wine's d3d10/11 implementation with DXVK, which typically results in huge performance gains and far superior compatibility compared to wine d3d libraries. You can find more here: https://github.com/doitsujin/dxvk *How to test?* *# Have either Fedora 30 or Fedora 31* dnf copr enable frantisekz/wine-dxvk dnf update wine dnf install wine-dxvk --allowerasing Then fire up as many DirectX 9,10,11 apps as you can :) and post results into this thread, especially if something got broken compared to normal dxvk installation or if some d3d9 apps regressed. DXVK works for d3d10 and d3d11, but note that I am also interested in apps using d3d9, because dxvk package replaces wine's dxgi library that's then used even for stuff that doesn't run through dxvk. Just make sure you don't have DXVK manually installed already in your wine prefix. [0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/wine/pull-request/3 [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733798 Feel free to ping me on frantisekz@#fedora-qa if you need anything. Thanks a lot!

1 0

Self Introduction: Ondřej Míchal
by Ondřej Míchal 31 Jul '19

31 Jul '19

Greetings, my name is Ondřej Míchal, I'm a student from Czech Republic who was lucky enough to get an internship at Red Hat for this year. I've been using Linux-y systems for almost 4 years already and Fedora for the past two. My main job as an intern is to work on Toolbox project that is heavily used in Fedora Silverblue. My other job is to create flatpaks from rpms to help propagate the use of flatpaks. I've never made any kind of packages before, so please bear with me if I make any mistakes. Best wishes, Ondřej Míchal

2 1

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
28
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

devel July 2019