Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE: xscreensaver 191769 NEW
Note: This is using a reduced set of packages in the build chroot as compared to the standard Fedora Extras build system before FC6test1. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires for more information, including the list of packages removed from the default build chroot.
Core Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 Sun Jun 4 18:05:59 CDT 2006 Number failed to build: 247 Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 11 Leaving: 236 (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package)
Of those expected to have worked... Without a bug filed: 46 ---------------------------------- automake15 automake16 cadaver emacs ethereal kasumi libwpd openmotif pcmciautils perl php pirut pwlib pycairo pykickstart radvd rdist redhat-artwork redhat-menus rgmanager ruby sane-backends scim-chewing scim-qtimm sg3_utils specspo squirrelmail switchdesk sysstat system-config-bind system-config-boot system-config-cluster system-config-display system-config-kickstart system-config-lvm system-config-services system-config-soundcard tsclient w3m wordtrans Xaw3d xmlsec1 xorg-x11-twm xorg-x11-xinit xorg-x11-xkbdata zenity
With bugs filed: 182 ---------------------------------- am-utils ['193347 CLOSED'] arts ['192367 NEEDINFO'] atk ['193349 CLOSED'] at-spi ['192368 CLOSED'] autorun ['193351 CLOSED'] avahi ['191663 CLOSED'] bc ['193352 NEW'] beagle ['191664 CLOSED'] brltty ['193353 NEW'] bsf ['192369 NEW'] cairo-java ['192371 NEW'] classpathx-jaf ['192372 ASSIGNED'] cman-kernel ['192570 NEW'] compat-gcc-296 ['191696 NEW'] dasher ['193356 NEW'] dbus ['193357 NEW'] desktop-printing ['192239 CLOSED'] device-mapper-multipath ['192242 NEEDINFO'] dlm-kernel ['192572 NEW'] doxygen ['193358 NEW'] e2fsprogs ['192247 NEW'] eel2 ['191909 CLOSED'] epiphany ['191665 NEW'] evince ['193359 CLOSED'] evolution-connector ['192251 CLOSED'] evolution-data-server ['193360 NEW'] evolution-webcal ['193361 NEW'] fbset ['193362 CLOSED'] file-roller ['193363 NEW'] frysk ['192256 NEW'] f-spot ['193364 NEW'] gail ['192492 CLOSED'] gaim ['192496 NEW'] gcalctool ['191910 CLOSED'] gconf-editor ['193365 NEW'] gdb ['193366 CLOSED'] gdk-pixbuf ['192493 NEW'] gecko-sharp2 ['192495 NEW'] GFS-kernel ['192569 NEW'] gimp ['193368 CLOSED'] glade2 ['193371 NEW'] gnbd-kernel ['192573 NEW'] gnome-applets ['193372 NEW'] gnome-backgrounds ['193373 NEW'] gnome-bluetooth ['193374 CLOSED'] gnome-doc-utils ['193375 NEW'] gnome-icon-theme ['193376 NEW'] gnome-media ['192497 CLOSED'] gnome-menus ['193379 NEW'] gnome-mime-data ['193381 NEW'] gnome-mount ['191680 CLOSED'] gnome-netstatus ['193382 NEW'] gnome-nettool ['193383 NEW'] gnome-panel ['192498 CLOSED'] gnome-pilot ['193384 NEW'] gnome-pilot-conduits ['193385 NEW'] gnome-power-manager ['191720 CLOSED'] gnome-python2 ['192499 NEW'] gnome-python2-desktop ['192500 CLOSED'] gnome-python2-extras ['192501 NEW'] gnome-screensaver ['193387 NEW'] gnome-session ['193388 NEW'] gnome-spell ['193389 NEW'] gnome-user-docs ['193390 NEW'] gnome-utils ['191757 CLOSED'] gnome-volume-manager ['193393 NEW'] gnucash ['192008 CLOSED'] gpart ['193396 NEW'] gtk+ ['193397 NEW'] gtk2 ['193398 CLOSED'] gucharmap ['193399 CLOSED'] hal ['191675 CLOSED'] hal-cups-utils ['192507 NEW'] HelixPlayer ['192512 NEW'] hwbrowser ['193400 CLOSED'] indent ['193401 NEW'] iptraf ['192510 NEW'] iso-codes ['193404 NEW'] jakarta-commons-codec ['192511 NEW'] jakarta-commons-dbcp ['192515 NEW'] jakarta-commons-el ['192514 NEW'] jakarta-commons-pool ['192516 NEW'] jakarta-taglibs-standard ['192517 NEW'] java-1.4.2-gcj-compat ['192518 NEW'] jsch ['191668 NEW'] kdeartwork ['192519 NEW'] kdebase ['192037 NEW'] kdegames ['192521 CLOSED'] kdelibs ['192522 CLOSED'] kdemultimedia ['192523 CLOSED'] kdenetwork ['192525 CLOSED'] kdepim ['192526 CLOSED'] kdesdk ['192527 CLOSED'] kdevelop ['192529 CLOSED'] kdewebdev ['191983 NEEDINFO_REPORTER'] krb5-auth-dialog ['193407 NEW'] latex2html ['191762 ASSIGNED'] ldapjdk ['192530 NEW'] libbonobo ['193408 NEW'] libbonoboui ['191728 CLOSED'] libbtctl ['191981 CLOSED'] libgconf-java ['192531 NEW'] libgcrypt ['193409 NEW'] libglade-java ['192532 NEW'] libgnome ['193410 NEW'] libgnomecanvas ['193411 NEW'] libgnomecups ['191747 CLOSED'] libgnomeprint22 ['191976 CLOSED'] libgnomeprintui22 ['193414 NEW'] libgnomeui ['193415 NEW'] libgpod ['193416 NEW'] libgsf ['193417 MODIFIED'] libgtop2 ['193418 NEW'] libIDL ['193419 NEW'] libnotify ['191731 NEW'] liboldX ['193420 NEW'] libsemanage ['191733 CLOSED'] libSM ['193421 NEW'] libvte-java ['192533 NEW'] libwnck ['191756 CLOSED'] libXau ['193422 NEW'] libXaw ['193423 NEW'] libxkbfile ['193424 NEW'] libxkbui ['193425 NEW'] libxklavier ['193426 NEW'] libXpm ['193427 NEW'] libXrandr ['193428 NEW'] libXrender ['193429 NEW'] libXres ['193502 NEW'] libXt ['193503 NEW'] libXtst ['193504 NEW'] libXv ['193505 NEW'] libXvMC ['193506 NEW'] libXxf86dga ['193507 NEW'] libXxf86misc ['193508 NEW'] libXxf86vm ['193509 NEW'] linux-atm ['193510 CLOSED'] lm_sensors ['193511 NEW'] lrzsz ['193513 NEW'] m17n-lib ['193524 ASSIGNED'] magma-plugins ['193525 NEW'] metacity ['191960 CLOSED'] mozilla ['191984 NEW'] mx4j ['192534 NEW'] nautilus-sendto ['191818 CLOSED'] ncpfs ['193526 NEEDINFO_REPORTER'] nfs-utils ['191943 NEW'] nfs-utils-lib ['191749 NEW'] notify-daemon ['191810 NEW'] openhpi ['191935 NEW'] perl-XML-Simple ['191911 NEW'] pkgconfig ['193552 CLOSED'] policycoreutils ['193537 NEW'] psgml ['191902 NEEDINFO_REPORTER'] psmisc ['191901 CLOSED'] pump ['193554 CLOSED'] pydict ['191898 NEW'] python-pyblock ['191866 NEW'] reiserfs-utils ['191889 NEW'] scim ['191886 CLOSED'] SDL ['193778 NEW'] sound-juicer ['182174 CLOSED'] squashfs-tools ['191880 CLOSED'] stardict ['191878 NEW'] struts ['192489 NEW'] subversion ['191611 NEW'] system-config-netboot ['192537 ASSIGNED'] tetex ['191874 ASSIGNED'] thunderbird ['191881 NEW'] tomboy ['191833 CLOSED'] tomcat5 ['192565 NEW'] tux ['191828 NEW'] vino ['191827 CLOSED'] vte ['192484 CLOSED'] xdoclet ['192483 NEW'] xjavadoc ['192057 NEW'] xorg-x11-drv-i810 ['192334 CLOSED'] xorg-x11-resutils ['192040 ASSIGNED'] xorg-x11-server-utils ['191987 ASSIGNED'] xorg-x11-utils ['191966 CLOSED'] yelp ['191660 CLOSED'] zsh ['191647 NEW']
Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/
OK, finally got some time to finsh bug reporting the below.
The list is now complete (well.. 99% sure it is) with the exception of these:
duplicates present emacs duplicates present ethereal duplicates present rgmanager
The new of each of these built ok.
libwpd failed because it was not able to download some of the requirements. I am now building this locally to test this myself.
Michael
Matt Domsch wrote:
Open Bugs which now build, and can be marked CLOSED RAWHIDE: xscreensaver 191769 NEW
Note: This is using a reduced set of packages in the build chroot as compared to the standard Fedora Extras build system before FC6test1. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires for more information, including the list of packages removed from the default build chroot.
Core Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for i386 Sun Jun 4 18:05:59 CDT 2006 Number failed to build: 247 Number expected to fail due to ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch: 11 Leaving: 236 (there may be some duplicates if rawhide has 2 versions of a package)
Of those expected to have worked... Without a bug filed: 46
automake15 automake16 cadaver emacs ethereal kasumi libwpd openmotif pcmciautils perl php pirut pwlib pycairo pykickstart radvd rdist redhat-artwork redhat-menus rgmanager ruby sane-backends scim-chewing scim-qtimm sg3_utils specspo squirrelmail switchdesk sysstat system-config-bind system-config-boot system-config-cluster system-config-display system-config-kickstart system-config-lvm system-config-services system-config-soundcard tsclient w3m wordtrans Xaw3d xmlsec1 xorg-x11-twm xorg-x11-xinit xorg-x11-xkbdata zenity
Michael J. Knox wrote:
OK, finally got some time to finsh bug reporting the below.
The list is now complete (well.. 99% sure it is) with the exception of these:
duplicates present emacs duplicates present ethereal duplicates present rgmanager
The new of each of these built ok.
libwpd failed because it was not able to download some of the requirements. I am now building this locally to test this myself.
Michael
Now that all of the packages have bugs assigned to them, is there any convenient way of spotting which ones are just bug reports and which ones have suggested fixes included, short of actually looking at all of the reports that are in the "NEW" state? I'd been plodding through the list making reports with suggested fixes based on the list of packages without a bug filed, but that list is now going to be empty.
Time to move on to Extras unless somebody can come up with something clever.
Paul.
Paul Howarth wrote:
Michael J. Knox wrote:
OK, finally got some time to finsh bug reporting the below.
The list is now complete (well.. 99% sure it is) with the exception of these:
duplicates present emacs duplicates present ethereal duplicates present rgmanager
The new of each of these built ok.
libwpd failed because it was not able to download some of the requirements. I am now building this locally to test this myself.
Michael
Now that all of the packages have bugs assigned to them, is there any convenient way of spotting which ones are just bug reports and which ones have suggested fixes included, short of actually looking at all of the reports that are in the "NEW" state? I'd been plodding through the list making reports with suggested fixes based on the list of packages without a bug filed, but that list is now going to be empty.
Time to move on to Extras unless somebody can come up with something clever.
Well... To see which are build requires bugs in core, you can look at this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=191529
Or if you want extras, you can look at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=193444
As you can see, extras has a long way to go to catch up.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires has links to template bug reports too.
The list of bugs to file may well be empty now, but there are still the follow ups and closing of bugs the are fixed and now build inside mock.
Michael
On Wed, 2006-06-07 at 06:43 +1200, Michael J Knox wrote:
Paul Howarth wrote:
Michael J. Knox wrote:
OK, finally got some time to finsh bug reporting the below.
The list is now complete (well.. 99% sure it is) with the exception of these:
duplicates present emacs duplicates present ethereal duplicates present rgmanager
The new of each of these built ok.
libwpd failed because it was not able to download some of the requirements. I am now building this locally to test this myself.
Michael
Now that all of the packages have bugs assigned to them, is there any convenient way of spotting which ones are just bug reports and which ones have suggested fixes included, short of actually looking at all of the reports that are in the "NEW" state? I'd been plodding through the list making reports with suggested fixes based on the list of packages without a bug filed, but that list is now going to be empty.
Time to move on to Extras unless somebody can come up with something clever.
Well... To see which are build requires bugs in core, you can look at this:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=191529
Or if you want extras, you can look at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/showdependencytree.cgi?id=193444
As you can see, extras has a long way to go to catch up.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/FixBuildRequires has links to template bug reports too.
I know about those. The problem is, the bug dependency tree shows which packages there are issues with, but not which packages already have suggested fixes. It's pointless me trying to fix a package that someone has already done some work on and made a suggestion for a fix. Previously I could look down the list of packages with no bug reported in Matt's reports and and I'd know that nobody had looked at those yet. Now I need to look at the bugzilla entries for each package, which takes far longer.
The list of bugs to file may well be empty now, but there are still the follow ups and closing of bugs the are fixed and now build inside mock.
Indeed, but the package maintainers that have received the bug reports are now in the best place to do that, rather than community members like me who need to search through bugzilla to find issues that need fixing. I'll concentrate on Extras for now, as it's easier to see what needs attention.
Paul.
-
Matt Domsch -
Michael J. Knox -
Paul Howarth