Hi,
since a year or so the AMD K10 thermal sensors module (k10temp) seems to be floating around the web. I would appreciate some kernel packager integrating it into the fedora 11 stock kernel - since without it I can not build (and trust!) a silent cooling system.
Any plans on this issue?
regards
Christoph
Dne 29.10.2009 12:38, Christoph Höger napsal(a):
since a year or so the AMD K10 thermal sensors module (k10temp) seems to be floating around the web. I would appreciate some kernel packager integrating it into the fedora 11 stock kernel - since without it I can not build (and trust!) a silent cooling system.
Any plans on this issue?
AMD K10 sensors support has been repeatedly refused by upstream lm_sensors developers because of the sensors' unreliability.
e.g. Rudolf Marek said in LKML on 2009-08-28:
There is a problem that all chips of fam10h have some errata which renders the monitoring driver unusable. Some people proposed a workaround if temps look too suspicious to refuse to load. This is against a sense of monitoring to refuse the values where they don't look "right". So there is no driver.
Michal
Am Donnerstag, den 29.10.2009, 14:51 +0100 schrieb Michal Schmidt:
Dne 29.10.2009 12:38, Christoph Höger napsal(a):
since a year or so the AMD K10 thermal sensors module (k10temp) seems to be floating around the web. I would appreciate some kernel packager integrating it into the fedora 11 stock kernel - since without it I can not build (and trust!) a silent cooling system.
Any plans on this issue?
AMD K10 sensors support has been repeatedly refused by upstream lm_sensors developers because of the sensors' unreliability.
e.g. Rudolf Marek said in LKML on 2009-08-28:
There is a problem that all chips of fam10h have some errata which renders the monitoring driver unusable. Some people proposed a workaround if temps look too suspicious to refuse to load. This is against a sense of monitoring to refuse the values where they don't look "right". So there is no driver.
So this means there is no chance to get my thermal sensors working under fedora?
On Thursday 29 October 2009 07:08:44 am Christoph Höger wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 29.10.2009, 14:51 +0100 schrieb Michal Schmidt:
Dne 29.10.2009 12:38, Christoph Höger napsal(a):
since a year or so the AMD K10 thermal sensors module (k10temp) seems to be floating around the web. I would appreciate some kernel packager integrating it into the fedora 11 stock kernel - since without it I can not build (and trust!) a silent cooling system.
Any plans on this issue?
AMD K10 sensors support has been repeatedly refused by upstream lm_sensors developers because of the sensors' unreliability.
e.g. Rudolf Marek said in LKML on 2009-08-28:
There is a problem that all chips of fam10h have some errata which renders the monitoring driver unusable. Some people proposed a workaround if temps look too suspicious to refuse to load. This is against a sense of monitoring to refuse the values where they don't look "right". So there is no driver.
So this means there is no chance to get my thermal sensors working under fedora?
Perhaps see if RPMFusion will carry the kmod.
Regards,
Am Donnerstag, den 29.10.2009, 14:51 +0100 schrieb Michal Schmidt:
Dne 29.10.2009 12:38, Christoph Höger napsal(a):
since a year or so the AMD K10 thermal sensors module (k10temp) seems to be floating around the web. I would appreciate some kernel packager integrating it into the fedora 11 stock kernel - since without it I can not build (and trust!) a silent cooling system.
Any plans on this issue?
AMD K10 sensors support has been repeatedly refused by upstream lm_sensors developers because of the sensors' unreliability.
e.g. Rudolf Marek said in LKML on 2009-08-28:
There is a problem that all chips of fam10h have some errata which renders the monitoring driver unusable. Some people proposed a workaround if temps look too suspicious to refuse to load. This is against a sense of monitoring to refuse the values where they don't look "right". So there is no driver.
Michal
Just one question: How are the lm_sensors names (10h, 11h) related to current processors? 11h seems to be WIP.
Dne 31.10.2009 12:51, Christoph Höger napsal(a):
Just one question: How are the lm_sensors names (10h, 11h) related to current processors? 11h seems to be WIP.
AMD codename "K10" refers to family 10h CPUs (Phenom, Phenom II). You can see your cpu family in /proc/cpuinfo. It's decimal there, so 10h will be shown as 16.
Michal
-
Christoph Höger -
Conrad Meyer -
Michal Schmidt