The poll about Fedora release names keeping is terminated [1]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/results/poll-rel-names?_csrf_token=ed7209dc06f5c8c58528ac55251f52c8ffacdc40.
And now ?
[1] *http://tinyurl.com/7vylap7
*-- *Antonio Trande "Fedora Ambassador"
**mail*: mailto:sagitter@fedoraproject.org sagitter@fedoraproject.org *Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org *Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net *Jabber http://jabber.org/* :sagitter AT jabber.org *GPG Key: 19E6DF27*
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 15:10 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
The poll about Fedora release names keeping is terminated [1]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/results/poll-rel-names?_csrf_token=ed7209dc06f5c8c58528ac55251f52c8ffacdc40.
Just for reference for the future, the last part of your url is not necessary (all the part after the ?_csrf). So you can provide a short url by just kicking it out: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/results/poll-rel-names
Thus avoiding to spread an obfuscated url.
Pierre
----- "Pierre-Yves Chibon" pingou@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 15:10 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
The poll about Fedora release names keeping is terminated
Just for reference for the future, the last part of your url is not necessary (all the part after the ?_csrf). So you can provide a short url by just kicking it out: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/results/poll-rel-names
Thus avoiding to spread an obfuscated url.
The poll should really have run through the regular elections to reach a wider user base.
-- Bob
The poll should really have run through the regular elections to reach a wider user base.
-- Bob
devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
What do you mean with "regular elections" ?
----- "Antonio Trande" anto.trande@gmail.com wrote:
The poll should really have run through the regular elections to reach a wider user base.
What do you mean with "regular elections" ?
The board, FESCo and FAMSCo elections that happen regularly with every release.
-- Bob
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:10:45 +0200, AT (Antonio) wrote:
The poll about Fedora release names keeping is terminated [1]https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/results/poll-rel-names?_csrf_token=ed7209dc06f5c8c58528ac55251f52c8ffacdc40.
And now ?
Well, I've missed the announcement of this poll. Where has it been announced?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-April/166087.html
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Michael Schwendt mschwendt@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 15:10:45 +0200, AT (Antonio) wrote:
The poll about Fedora release names keeping is terminated [1]<
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/results/poll-rel-names?_csrf_token=ed...
.
And now ?
Well, I've missed the announcement of this poll. Where has it been announced?
-- Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.3.2-8.fc17.x86_64 loadavg: 0.12 0.08 0.06 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 14:23:31 +0100, JL (Johannes) wrote:
Well, I've missed the announcement of this poll. Where has it been announced?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-April/166087.html
I haven't received that mail. I've tracked down the announcement in the list [web]archives of "announce" and "devel-announce" list, also found a huge thread of replies in my "devel" list folder, but not the original message. No Fedora Planet post about it either. Strange.
Something has gone wrong here. And one week has not been enough time for me to notice that.
* Michael Schwendt [27/04/2012 15:31] :
Well, I've missed the announcement of this poll. Where has it been announced?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2012-April/003060.html http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2012-April/000919.ht...
Emmanuel
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 03:10:45PM +0200, Antonio Trande wrote:
The poll about Fedora release names keeping is terminated [1]. And now ?
The Board will look at the results and decide whether to stop having release namees for Fedora 19 or to start the process of revising how they are chosen.
If the latter, I'm hoping we'll organize that as a working group outside of the Board (a Board member(s) may organize it but it won't be something that occurs at the Board meetings where things are only public half of the time)
-Toshio
----- "Toshio Kuratomi" a.badger@gmail.com wrote:
The Board will look at the results and decide whether to stop having release namees for Fedora 19 or to start the process of revising how they are chosen.
If the latter, I'm hoping we'll organize that as a working group outside of the Board (a Board member(s) may organize it but it won't be something that occurs at the Board meetings where things are only public half of the time)
Will the poll results be made public? If so when, if not why?
-- Bob
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Robert 'Bob' Jensen bob@fedoraunity.org wrote:
----- "Toshio Kuratomi" a.badger@gmail.com wrote:
The Board will look at the results and decide whether to stop having release namees for Fedora 19 or to start the process of revising how they are chosen.
If the latter, I'm hoping we'll organize that as a working group outside of the Board (a Board member(s) may organize it but it won't be something that occurs at the Board meetings where things are only public half of the time)
Will the poll results be made public? If so when, if not why?
A link to the results was in the first message in this thread.
Here it is again, just in case:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/results/poll-rel-names
josh
----- "Josh Boyer" jwboyer@gmail.com wrote:
A link to the results was in the first message in this thread.
Here it is again, just in case:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/results/poll-rel-names
Thanks Josh, I overlooked it.
-- Bob
-
Antonio Trande -
Emmanuel Seyman -
Johannes Lips -
Josh Boyer -
Michael Schwendt -
Pierre-Yves Chibon -
Robert 'Bob' Jensen -
Toshio Kuratomi