I'm working on the latest MuseScore release. They have bundled a new
font, Edwin, which is released under the AGPL version 3. The license
text includes this:
The font and related files in this directory are distributed under the
GNU AFFERO GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 3 (see the file COPYING), with
the following exemption:
As a special exception, permission is granted to include these font
programs in a Postscript or PDF file that consists of a document that
contains text to be displayed or printed using this font, regardless
of the conditions or license applying to the document itself.
Is that worth noting as a "with exceptions" clause, or should I just
use AGPLv3 for the license?
On a mostly unrelated note, I clicked on the "Upstream URL" link for
"Affero General Public License 3.0 with Zarafa trademark exceptions"
on the licensing list, and got a 404.
Regards,
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
After review, Fedora has determined that the Nmap Public Source
License (NPSL) Version 0.92[1] is not acceptable for use in Fedora. We
have updated our "Bad License" list[2] to include NPSL. No software
under that license may be included in Fedora (including EPEL and
COPRs).
The license includes restrictions on "proprietary software companies",
which is a field of endeavor restriction contrary to the Open Source
Definition[3]. If future versions of the NPSL are released, they will
be re-evaluated for use in Fedora.
[1] https://nmap.org/npsl/npsl-annotated.html
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Bad_Licenses
[3] https://opensource.org/osd
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis