I'm working on packaging GSmartControl. Most of it is under a "GPLv2 or GPLv3" license, some is BSD, some is zlib, some is Boost.

Some files have no notice, and their COPYING file says "All files which don't have any copyright notices, as well as tests and examples are covered under the Whatever License. See LICENSE_whatever.txt for details."

LICENSE_whatever.txt says:

Whatever License

THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED 'AS-IS', WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTY. IN NO EVENT WILL THE AUTHORS BE HELD LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES ARISING FROM THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE.

Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim or modified copies of this license document.

Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose, including commercial applications, and to alter it and redistribute it freely.

Is this an acceptable license for Fedora? If so, what should it be called in the License tag in the spec file?

When there are both "or" and "and" conditions involved in multiple licensing, how is that conveyed in the License tag? Can I use parenthesis, e.g.

License: (GPLv2 or GPLv3) and BSD and zlib and Boost and Whatever

Thanks! Eric