Hi, I want to know if this http://code.google.com/p/impacket/source/browse/trunk/LICENSE is a valid license which is modified version of ASL 2.0 license.
Regards, Parag.
--------------------------- DISCLAIMER: This email does not contain legal advice. This email also does not establish a solicitor-client relationship. You should neither take nor fail to take any action based on any information in this email. If you have a legal issue, then retain legal counsel. --------------------------
Hi Parag,
The license you are pointing to appears to be a modified version of the Apache License Version 1.1, with the only changes being the replacement of the words "Apache" and "Apache Software Foundation" with "Impacket" and "CORE Security Technologies", respectively. The page you linked to also lists two Python programs, Smb.py and nmb.py, which appear to be licensed under the zlib license.
Thanks, Adam Saunders
On 02/27/2014 12:13 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
Hi, I want to know if this http://code.google.com/p/impacket/source/browse/trunk/LICENSE is a valid license which is modified version of ASL 2.0 license.
Regards, Parag. _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
Hi, Thanks Adam for your reply. I guess then license tag for source[1] is "ASL 1.1 and zlib" ?
Regards, Parag. [1] https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/i/impacket/impacket-0.9.11.tar.gz
On 02/27/2014 07:11 PM, Adam Saunders wrote:
DISCLAIMER: This email does not contain legal advice. This email also does not establish a solicitor-client relationship. You should neither take nor fail to take any action based on any information in this email. If you have a legal issue, then retain legal counsel.
Hi Parag,
The license you are pointing to appears to be a modified version of the Apache License Version 1.1, with the only changes being the replacement of the words "Apache" and "Apache Software Foundation" with "Impacket" and "CORE Security Technologies", respectively. The page you linked to also lists two Python programs, Smb.py and nmb.py, which appear to be licensed under the zlib license.
Thanks, Adam Saunders
On 02/27/2014 12:13 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
Hi, I want to know if this http://code.google.com/p/impacket/source/browse/trunk/LICENSE is a valid license which is modified version of ASL 2.0 license.
Regards, Parag. _______________________________________________ legal mailing list legal@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
legal mailing list legal@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
On 02/27/2014 02:52 PM, Parag Nemade wrote:> Hi,
Thanks Adam for your reply. I guess then license tag for source[1] is "ASL 1.1 and zlib" ?
Parag, thanks for your work. I guess we still have no answer to go on with the review [1] because the blocker FE-Legal was not removed. Or did I miss something?
Kind regards,
Fabian
Hi Fabian,
On 06/28/2014 09:18 PM, Fabian Affolter wrote:
On 02/27/2014 02:52 PM, Parag Nemade wrote:> Hi,
Thanks Adam for your reply. I guess then license tag for source[1] is "ASL 1.1 and zlib" ?
Parag, thanks for your work. I guess we still have no answer to go on with the review [1] because the blocker FE-Legal was not removed. Or did I miss something?
Thanks for your patience. As I have not got any further reply, I will consider reply from Adam Saunders for license tag. I will wait for few more days and by weekend if we will not see any reply then I will remove FE-Legal and proceed with the review.
Regards, Parag.
On 06/30/2014 12:03 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
Hi Fabian,
On 06/28/2014 09:18 PM, Fabian Affolter wrote:
On 02/27/2014 02:52 PM, Parag Nemade wrote:> Hi,
Thanks Adam for your reply. I guess then license tag for source[1] is "ASL 1.1 and zlib" ?
Parag, thanks for your work. I guess we still have no answer to go on with the review [1] because the blocker FE-Legal was not removed. Or did I miss something?
Thanks for your patience. As I have not got any further reply, I will consider reply from Adam Saunders for license tag. I will wait for few more days and by weekend if we will not see any reply then I will remove FE-Legal and proceed with the review.
Sorry. I missed that there was a bug on this one, the blocker is now properly cleared.
~tom
== ¸.·´¯`·.´¯`·.¸¸.·´¯`·.¸><(((º> OSAS @ Red Hat University Outreach || Fedora Special Projects || Fedora Legal
-
Adam Saunders -
Fabian Affolter -
Parag Nemade -
Tom Callaway