There's currently a package called JDBM up for review. Its license is much like ASL 1.1, but not identical, so I'd like to have it reviewed. The license is here: http://jdbm.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jdbm/jdbm/LICENSE.txt?revision=1.1&am...
The package review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844033
Thanks.
Andy
On 08/02/2012 01:33 PM, Andy Grimm wrote:
There's currently a package called JDBM up for review. Its license is much like ASL 1.1, but not identical, so I'd like to have it reviewed. The license is here: http://jdbm.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jdbm/jdbm/LICENSE.txt?revision=1.1&am...
The package review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844033
We actually call it BSD in Fedora:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD#jCharts_Variant
(ASL 1.1 is a BSD derived license, so one could argue that this license is ASL 1.1 derived instead of BSD, but, whatever).
~tom
== Fedora Project
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Tom Callaway tcallawa@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/02/2012 01:33 PM, Andy Grimm wrote:
There's currently a package called JDBM up for review. Its license is much like ASL 1.1, but not identical, so I'd like to have it reviewed. The license is here: http://jdbm.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/jdbm/jdbm/LICENSE.txt?revision=1.1&am...
The package review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844033
We actually call it BSD in Fedora:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD#jCharts_Variant
(ASL 1.1 is a BSD derived license, so one could argue that this license is ASL 1.1 derived instead of BSD, but, whatever).
Okay. I would have thought that clause 4 made it pretty distinct from BSD, but I'll go with it. Thanks for the quick response.
Andy
~tom
== Fedora Project
-
Andy Grimm -
Tom Callaway