On this list previously the EUPL v1.0 was considered unacceptable for Fedora, (http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-legal-list@redhat.com/msg00144.html)
Since then, there is now a EUPL v1.1, http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/eupl does that fix the problems, or remain unacceptable ?
Assuming that the EUPL v1.1 remains unacceptable, can someone e.g. dual licence something as EUPL v1.X and say LGPLv2 in order to make it acceptable for us.
C.
On 05/29/2009 12:40 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Assuming that the EUPL v1.1 remains unacceptable, can someone e.g. dual licence something as EUPL v1.X and say LGPLv2 in order to make it acceptable for us.
If a software is dual licensed and if any one of them is acceptable to Fedora, the software will be permitted in Fedora (ie) if EUPL v1.x is not acceptable, then we would accept it in Fedora under the LGPLv2 license.
Rahul