mutt-kz October 2012

mutt-kz@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
3 discussions

omit inbox tag on sent folder
by R. Andrew Bailey 23 May '13

23 May '13

I've been using mutt-kz for several months and absolutely love it. I suspect this is a dumb question, so apologies in advance. I use 'set record="+sent"', and I find that my sent mail is automatically indexed (good), but that it gets tagged as +inbox. I considered adding sent to the new.ignore option in notmuch-config, but I definitely like having it indexed. I'm thinking I can ignore sent and then use a post send hook to index my sentmail folder without adding +inbox, but I'm guessing there may be some simpler way to do this. Any advice appreciated. .andy

2 1

Mark read using notmuch tag -unread
by Stefan Hajnoczi 17 Oct '12

17 Oct '12

Hi, I've been using notmuch together with mutt to solve an email annoyance: a message in multiple folders should be marked read all at once. With vanilla mutt you need to mark the message read in each folder (my messages are filtered into mailing list folders, so I have this problem when a message is CCed to multiple mailing lists that I subscribe to). Here's the macro I use: macro index \Cr "<enter-command>unset wait_key<enter><pipe-message>~/notmuch/contrib/notmuch-mutt/notmuch-mutt tag --whole-thread -- -unread<enter><sync-mailbox><previous-unread><next-unread>" "Mark thread read and jump to next unread message" Together with a notmuch-mutt patch that I recently sent: http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2012/012527.html Forking a notmuch-mutt process and syncing the mailbox afterwards takes some time. It would be much smoother if mutt was linked against notmuch... So here is my question: Can mutt-kz do this? Ideally <read-thread> would use notmuch to remove the unread tag from all messages in a thread. It's not clear to me from skimming the source. The notmuch integration seems to be focussed on virtual folders/queries and some convenience commands rather than replacing mutt's message access (e.g. maildir) completely with notmuch. Stefan

2 1

Using %X in $index_format
by Suvayu Ali 15 Oct '12

15 Oct '12

Hi, I am using "%4C %Z %?X?@& ? %{%b %d} %-15.15n (%?M?»%3M&%4c?) %s" as my $index_format. This works well with mutt, but with mutt-kz "%?X?@& ?" does not seem to work as expected. My goal with that bit was to show "@" when the message has an attachment and " " otherwise. I looked in init.h, the docs for $index_format seem to mention %X so I am not sure what I am doing wrong. Any ideas? If I wanted to fix this bug myself, which part of the source should I look at? It would be great if someone could point me in the right direction. Thanks, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.

1 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

mutt-kz October 2012