mutt-kz April 2013

mutt-kz@lists.fedoraproject.org

10 participants
11 discussions

omit inbox tag on sent folder
by R. Andrew Bailey 23 May '13

23 May '13

I've been using mutt-kz for several months and absolutely love it. I suspect this is a dumb question, so apologies in advance. I use 'set record="+sent"', and I find that my sent mail is automatically indexed (good), but that it gets tagged as +inbox. I considered adding sent to the new.ignore option in notmuch-config, but I definitely like having it indexed. I'm thinking I can ignore sent and then use a post send hook to index my sentmail folder without adding +inbox, but I'm guessing there may be some simpler way to do this. Any advice appreciated. .andy

2 1

[PATCH] notmuch: hide signed and encrypted tags by default
by David Sterba 23 May '13

23 May '13

Mutt shows signed/encrypted status in another way and occupies only 1 char in index line. Hide the tags by default and leave more space for other tags. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba(a)suse.cz> --- init.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/init.h b/init.h index 478ea5b..2edb02a 100644 --- a/init.h +++ b/init.h @@ -1607,7 +1607,7 @@ struct option_t MuttVars[] = { ** notmuch://<absolute path>. */ - { "nm_hidden_tags", DT_STR, R_NONE, UL &NotmuchHiddenTags, UL "unread,draft,flagged,passed,replied,attachment" }, + { "nm_hidden_tags", DT_STR, R_NONE, UL &NotmuchHiddenTags, UL "unread,draft,flagged,passed,replied,attachment,signed,encrypted" }, /* ** .pp ** This variable specifies private notmuch tags which should not be printed -- 1.8.0.2

2 1

state of the fork
by Douglas Campos 11 May '13

11 May '13

Howdy! After getting frustrated with mutt's development pace, I've ended here. Tons of questions: - What's the state of the fork? - Is there any plans of doing a release? - What about cleaning all the hg stuff from the repo since we've moved to git (volunteering myself) - What to do with all those open pull requests? - Any reason for not renaming the target executable to mutt-kz? Thanks! -- qmx

2 2

[PATCH] Add strndup implementation for systems with lack of it
by Vladimir Marek 07 May '13

07 May '13

From: Vladimir Marek <vlmarek(a)volny.cz> Solaris 10 FCS (first release) does not have strndup implementation. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Marek <vlmarek(a)volny.cz> --- configure.ac | 2 +- strndup.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 strndup.c diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index a92e81c..5d20cd9 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ AC_CHECK_TYPE(ssize_t, int) AC_CHECK_FUNCS(fgetpos memmove setegid srand48 strerror) -AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([setenv strcasecmp strdup strsep strtok_r wcscasecmp]) +AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([setenv strcasecmp strdup strsep strtok_r wcscasecmp strndup]) AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([strcasestr mkdtemp]) AC_CHECK_FUNC(getopt) diff --git a/strndup.c b/strndup.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..81557ba --- /dev/null +++ b/strndup.c @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +/* Solaris 10 FCS does not have strndup */ + +#include <string.h> +#include <stdlib.h> + +char * +strndup(const char *s, size_t n) +{ + size_t len; + char *ret; + + if (!s) + return (char *)NULL; + + len = strlen(s); + if (n < len) + len = n; + + ret = malloc(len + 1); /* To store '\0' */ + memcpy(ret, s, len); + ret[len] = '\0'; + return ret; +} -- 1.7.9.2

3 2

Re: state of the fork
by Suvayu Ali 28 Apr '13

28 Apr '13

Hi, On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 8:02 AM, Douglas Campos <qmx(a)qmx.me> wrote: > > After getting frustrated with mutt's development pace, I've ended here. Actually recently it started being quite active. Some details below. > Tons of questions: > - What's the state of the fork? It is moderately active (my impression as a user) > - Is there any plans of doing a release? > - What about cleaning all the hg stuff from the repo since we've moved > to git (volunteering myself) I think the hg stuff is around to facilitate easy merging with latest mutt developments. mutt-kz was synced with latest mutt developments few months ago. As you can see here: <http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/>, mutt has been quite active lately. > - What to do with all those open pull requests? > - Any reason for not renaming the target executable to mutt-kz? Again my comment is as a user, since mutt-kz is in every way backwards compatible with mutt I think it would be more consistent to keep the executable name same. For example both uses the same user startup file, ~/.muttrc, the configuration formats are same, and so on. Cheers, -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free.

2 3

Upstream tracking
by Raghavendra D Prabhu 12 Apr '13

12 Apr '13

Hi, I see that mutt (hg) -- http://dev.mutt.org/hg/mutt/ -- seems to be active again. So, are these upstream changes merged into mutt-kz periodically? Regards, -- Raghavendra Prabhu GPG Id : 0xD72BE977 Fingerprint: B93F EBCB 8E05 7039 CD3C A4B8 A616 DCA1 D72B E977 www: wnohang.net

5 10

M-b~@~Y in place of quote
by Vikas Rawal 11 Apr '13

11 Apr '13

Since I shifted from the precompiled version of mutt from debian's repositories to self-compiled mutt-kz, mutt has been showing M-b~@~Y in place of '. So, for example, "Don't" shows up as "DonM-b~@~Y". What could be the problem? Vikas

3 5

Installation of mutt-kz in debian
by Vikas Rawal 09 Apr '13

09 Apr '13

I am trying to install mutt-kz in debian. But when I do ./configure --enable-notmuch it complains: configure: error: Unable to find Notmuch library I have notmuch packages installed. What could be the problem? Vikas

2 5

Patches for consideration
by Phil Pennock 06 Apr '13

06 Apr '13

I've three patches relative to mutt 1.5.21 at: <http://people.spodhuis.org/phil.pennock/software/mutt-patches/> I believe that the "TLS v1.1 and v1.2" functionality is now in mutt. "TLS ServerNameIndication" support would be handy. I know that my SMTP mail-server is capable of handing out different certs for different hostnames and Submission is where that makes the most sense. The "Gmail custom search IMAP extension" functionality works, but has some rough edges; I'd forgotten most of the mutt internals and didn't come back up to speed for writing that patch. It works well enough for me, that I can use =/ to do a server-side search using the Gmail query syntax. There have been posts from me (<various>@spodhuis.org) to the mutt-dev list with more details on each patch, if you're curious. Regards, -Phil

1 0

Opening virtual folder performance
by Ross Lagerwall 04 Apr '13

04 Apr '13

Hi, I use notmuch-deliver with procmail to retrieve my mail and then use mutt-kz to view it. The problem that I am having is that mutt-kz takes 10s of seconds to open a virtual folder the first time after power on. After that, opening it is almost instant. During this time, it appears to grind my hard disk. I have tried setting header caching to a file or directory but in neither case does it actually cache any headers. This is with notmuch 0.15.2 and folders with between 500 and 1000 mails in it. In other words, not much. Any ideas on what may cause this issue? Thanks -- Ross Lagerwall

2 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

mutt-kz April 2013