rel-eng July 2011

rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
94 discussions

#1107: auto-cleanup rawhide trees
by Fedora Release Engineering 29 Apr '15

29 Apr '15

#1107: auto-cleanup rawhide trees -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: notting | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: enhancement | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Rawhide tree expiry is manual at the moment, unless I missed something. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1107> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 8

#4071: Block pushes to origin/ in gitolite ACLs
by Fedora Release Engineering 24 Sep '14

24 Sep '14

#4071: Block pushes to origin/ in gitolite ACLs ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jkeating | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: git Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Common typo to create a new branch that starts with "origin/". We can stop that at the ACL level. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4071> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 5

#4355: metadata for "grouped" files on master mirror
by Fedora Release Engineering 15 Sep '14

15 Sep '14

#4355: metadata for "grouped" files on master mirror ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ Reporter: mdomsch | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: other Keywords: | ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ This may be less of an issue now that we don't have the split CD set, but I would like it if rel-eng could produce a file into the master mirror tree for "groups" of files that should be a single consistent download set, such as a DVD and the checksum file, or the set of files that are together inside a single torrent. MirrorManager is growing the idea of a "file group", a single requestable entity that will return a metalink listing each of the files in the file group. The intent was to use it for the multi-CD download sets, but it's just as valuable for the DVD and checksum file, or other similar groups. But it needs to be a file (say, .fileset or something), in a directory that MM can find and use to build the FileGroups. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4355> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 2

#3903: change component owner in bugzilla
by Fedora Release Engineering 07 Sep '14

07 Sep '14

#3903: change component owner in bugzilla ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: mmaslano | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: other Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Could you create perl-fedora-maint as bug owner for all my perl-* modules and perl component? I'm sharing bugs with my colleagues in RHEL and we'd like to have it also for Fedora. I suppose set up mailing list is also needed. This should be applied only for perl modules, where I am an owner of the package. Not only co-maintainer. The group perl-fedora-maint should include mmaslano, ppisar, psabata. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3903> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 15

#3624: fullfilelist changes
by Fedora Release Engineering 20 Jan '14

20 Jan '14

#3624: fullfilelist changes -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: mmcgrath | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: enhancement | Status: new Milestone: | Component: other Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- After each push, we need to run the following command: rsync -r . > fullfilelist This should overwrite the fullfilelist that's there and isn't very useful at the moment: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/fullfilelist We can't do this via a cron job, it has to go out after each push so it needs to be added to those scripts. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3624> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 3

#4084: gcc multiarch broken dep
by Fedora Release Engineering 06 Jan '14

06 Jan '14

#4084: gcc multiarch broken dep -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- Reporter: mschwendt | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: defect | Status: new Milestone: | Component: mash Keywords: | -----------------------+---------------------------------------------------- There is a discrepancy between what is pushed to stable dist repos and to updates-testing. With the latest "gcc" test-update, F-14 is affected, too (which means this is not specific to F-13). gcc-gfortran.i686 is available in x86_64 development/14 but not x86_64 updates/testing/14. The version-specific dependency in it is unresolvable deps if it isn't updated. What is the cause of it? Can it be fixed in the compose tools? Or is a self-"Obsoletes" (which is not arch-specific by default) in gcc-gfortran the only cure? http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/14/x86_64/os… {{{ [ ] gcc-4.5.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm 13-Aug-2010 14:51 14M [ ] gcc-c++-4.5.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm 13-Aug-2010 14:50 5.1M [X] gcc-gfortran-4.5.1-1.fc14.i686.rpm 13-Aug-2010 14:56 4.4M [ ] gcc-gfortran-4.5.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm 13-Aug-2010 14:54 5.0M [ ] gcc-gnat-4.5.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm 13-Aug-2010 14:52 9.9M [ ] gcc-java-4.5.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm 13-Aug-2010 14:56 4.0M [ ] gcc-objc++-4.5.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm 13-Aug-2010 14:56 4.3M [ ] gcc-objc-4.5.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm 13-Aug-2010 14:57 3.9M [ ] libgcc-4.5.1-1.fc14.i686.rpm 13-Aug-2010 14:53 61K [ ] libgcc-4.5.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm 13-Aug-2010 14:51 52K [ ] libgcj-4.5.1-1.fc14.i686.rpm 13-Aug-2010 14:54 17M [ ] libgcj-4.5.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm 13-Aug-2010 14:55 19M [ ] libgcj-devel-4.5.1-1.fc14.i686.rpm 13-Aug-2010 14:50 1.5M [ ] libgcj-devel-4.5.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm 13-Aug-2010 14:51 1.5M [ ] libgcj-src-4.5.1-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm 13-Aug-2010 14:51 12M }}} http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/14/x86_64/os… {{{ [ ] gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm 07-Sep-2010 12:36 14M [ ] gcc-c++-4.5.1-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm 07-Sep-2010 12:39 5.1M [ ] gcc-gfortran-4.5.1-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm 07-Sep-2010 12:42 5.0M [ ] gcc-gnat-4.5.1-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm 07-Sep-2010 12:31 9.9M [ ] gcc-java-4.5.1-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm 07-Sep-2010 12:29 4.0M [ ] gcc-objc++-4.5.1-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm 07-Sep-2010 12:35 4.3M [ ] gcc-objc-4.5.1-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm 07-Sep-2010 12:34 3.9M [ ] libgcc-4.5.1-3.fc14.i686.rpm 07-Sep-2010 12:33 62K [ ] libgcc-4.5.1-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm 07-Sep-2010 12:33 52K [ ] libgcj-4.5.1-3.fc14.i686.rpm 07-Sep-2010 12:29 17M [ ] libgcj-4.5.1-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm 07-Sep-2010 12:35 19M [ ] libgcj-devel-4.5.1-3.fc14.i686.rpm 07-Sep-2010 12:29 1.5M [ ] libgcj-devel-4.5.1-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm 07-Sep-2010 12:37 1.5M [ ] libgcj-src-4.5.1-3.fc14.x86_64.rpm 07-Sep-2010 12:41 12M }}} -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4084> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 9

#3761: add gpg signature for .treeinfo file and/or add CHECKSUM file for unsigned content of images
by Fedora Release Engineering 06 Jan '14

06 Jan '14

#3761: add gpg signature for .treeinfo file and/or add CHECKSUM file for unsigned content of images ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: jkeating | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: other Keywords: meeting | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Description of problem: Currently the only way to verify the contents of .treeinfo or the installer images is to download the .iso and the regarding -CHECKSUM file and check it. But e.g. preupgrade does not download the .iso but the *.img files, the kernel and the .treeinfo directly from a mirror. Therefore it is also not possible to easily verify these files. I guess the preupgrade way of updating is somehow popular, therefore it should be possible to do this securely. I filed a bug against preupgrade for not verifying anything and not announcing this here: bug 509338 -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3761> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 2

#4267: collectd in EPEL
by Fedora Release Engineering 30 Nov '13

30 Nov '13

#4267: collectd in EPEL ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Reporter: mmcgrath | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: mash Keywords: | ----------------------+----------------------------------------------------- Can we get collectd in EPEL set to disable multi-lib? It has become an issue on EPEL where installing "collectd" via yum creates conflicts it shouldn't. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4267> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 4

#4324: Change product string in pungi for better syslinux usability
by Fedora Release Engineering 08 Aug '13

08 Aug '13

#4324: Change product string in pungi for better syslinux usability -------------------+-------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: duffy | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: other Keywords: | -------------------+-------------------------------------------------------- Right now when you boot Fedora live media or otherwise call up Syslinux, you are greeted with: "Welcome to Fedora-14-x86_64-Live-Desktop!" It's not the most welcoming message though because the string is a bit unwieldy and hard-to-read. Syslinux pulls from the PRODUCT string produced via pungi: scripts/mk-images.x86: sed -i "s/@PRODUCT@/$PRODUCT/g" $MBD_BOOTTREE/syslinux.cfg I was hoping that string produced by pungi could be cleaned up a bit to be more friendly. Some examples I think that would be better: Fedora 14 (32-bit) Fedora 14 (64-bit) Fedora 14 (32-bit DVD) Fedora 14 (64-bit DVD) Fedora 14: KDE Plasma (32-bit) Fedora 14: KDE Plasma (64-bit) Fedora 14: LXDE (32-bit) Fedora 14: LXDE (64-bit) Fedora 14: Xfce (32-bit) Fedora 14: Xfce (64-bit) Fedora 14: Electronic Lab (32-bit) Fedora 14: Electronic Lab (64-bit) Fedora 14: Design Suite (32-bit) Fedora 14: Design Suite (64-bit) Fedora 14: Sugar on a Stick (32-bit) Fedora 14: Sugar on a Stick (64-bit) Fedora 14: Games Spin (32-bit) Fedora 14: Games Spin (64-bit) Fedora 14: Security Lab (32-bit) Fedora 14: Security Lab (64-bit) So the rules I'm suggesting for the strings: - The default desktop is called simply "Fedora $VERSION ($ARCH)" - Any non-default spins are called "Fedora $VERSION: $NAME_OF_SPIN ($ARCH)" - The spin name is derived from either the http://fedoraproject.org/en /get-fedora-options#desktops get.fpo options page or the spins.fedoraproject.org full name for the spin. (KDE is probably updating theirs to KDE Plasma as reflected in example strings above.) - Put the arch in () after the name of the spin. Where arch is '32-bit', '64-bit', 'Power PC', etc. The arch names here are suggested to be consistent with what the downloads are labeled on our main web pages (get.fpo and spins.fpo) - If it's live media, don't indicate that, don't point it out. Only indicate if it's a DVD. If it's DVD, point it out after the arch in the ( ) - $VERSION should be a whole number without decimals for a final release. For test releases / release candidates it would be nice to indicate something like, '14.92 RC1' '14.91 Nightly 06 Jan 2011' but that's up to your discretion! This is where the text will appear in syslinux: https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/3/3d/Installux-syslinux- prop1-proto1-ss2.png What do you think? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4324> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 4

#3883: more meaningful error if module isn't found
by Fedora Release Engineering 17 Jul '13

17 Jul '13

#3883: more meaningful error if module isn't found -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: kalev | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: enhancement | Status: new Milestone: | Component: other Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Right now fedpkg fails with access denied message if there is not such module: {{{ $ fedpkg clone gtkmm30 R access for gtkmm30 DENIED to kalev }}} Would be nice to get a more meaningful error in that case, perhaps "module not found". Filing it in releng trac as the error is coming from gitolite, just being passed along by fedpkg. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3883> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng July 2011