rel-eng December 2014

rel-eng@lists.fedoraproject.org

8 participants
89 discussions

#6017: please give kushal permissions to do scratch cloud image builds in koji
by Fedora Release Engineering 29 Apr '15

29 Apr '15

#6017: please give kushal permissions to do scratch cloud image builds in koji ----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: mattdm | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 21 Beta | Component: koji Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------------+------------------------ If I remember right (and I admit I remember only vaguely) there are special permissions required to build images in koji. Please give these to kushal so he can create scratch images to test things out. Thank you! -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6017> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

2 11

#6040: system to run regular orphaned packages status reports from
by Fedora Release Engineering 29 Apr '15

29 Apr '15

#6040: system to run regular orphaned packages status reports from -----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: till | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 20 Final | Component: koji Keywords: meeting | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------+------------------------ Currently I am creating status reports for orphaned packages from autosign01, but this should move to its own system. Requirements: - run cron jobs - send e-mails - fast access to koji and pkgdb - access to mash repos - possible in the future: access to a directory served by a web server for HTML based status reports -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6040> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 7

#5665: Providing a master CHECKSUMS file for boot.fpo
by Fedora Release Engineering 29 Apr '15

29 Apr '15

#5665: Providing a master CHECKSUMS file for boot.fpo -----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: shaiton | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 20 Alpha | Component: other Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------+------------------------ Hi, as requested to webmasters[1], could we get a CHECKSUMS file (as provided for other Fedora releases) including all checksums? It also needs to be signed of course. You might decide that it is not needed, just forwarded the query. [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/websites/2013-July/011535.html -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5665> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 3

#5939: f21-kde koji tag/target
by Fedora Release Engineering 29 Apr '15

29 Apr '15

#5939: f21-kde koji tag/target ---------------------+------------------------ Reporter: rdieter | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ---------------------+------------------------ Please create a f21-kde koji tag/target. kde-sig will continue to have monthly kde4 and kde frameworks 5 updates to work on, so having this till be greatly beneficial. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5939> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 3

#1107: auto-cleanup rawhide trees
by Fedora Release Engineering 29 Apr '15

29 Apr '15

#1107: auto-cleanup rawhide trees -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: notting | Owner: rel-eng(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Type: enhancement | Status: new Milestone: | Component: koji Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Rawhide tree expiry is manual at the moment, unless I missed something. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1107> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 8

#6035: read cloud image size from spin-kickstarts git repo instead of hardcoding in the script
by Fedora Release Engineering 29 Apr '15

29 Apr '15

#6035: read cloud image size from spin-kickstarts git repo instead of hardcoding in the script -----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: mattdm | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 21 Final | Component: koji Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------+------------------------ Currently, the cloud image size is hardcoded at 3GB in https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/build-cloud- images#n39 This is apparently too small for current Atomic, and may actually be _bigger_ than we want for Cloud Base. We want to fix the size problem in Atomic, though, and don't want to keep hassling with tickets to rel-eng to change the scripts. Instead, please make this read from the spin-kickstarts file -- either a config file in spin-kickstarts (e.g. fedora-cloud-atomic.ks.cfg) or from the kickstart file itself (a special comment? i'm not sure that'll survive the kickstart smashing). -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6035> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 5

#6020: If Workstation tree is being dropped, please do same with Cloud
by Fedora Release Engineering 29 Apr '15

29 Apr '15

#6020: If Workstation tree is being dropped, please do same with Cloud ----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: mattdm | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 21 Beta | Component: koji Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------------+------------------------ Based on yesterday's FESCo meeting, the plan is for Fedora Workstation composes to be refactored such that there is not a separate Workstation tree, but that top-level directory on the mirrors will just contain the live ISOs in various architectures. I still think just rm'ing the netinst images from those trees is the lowest-impact workaround, but if this is what we are doing, Cloud should match because the exact same situation applies. So, please drop everything but the Images subdirectory from the Cloud tree. Thank you! -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6020> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 4

#5984: Adding metadata to the Fedora Workstation Live CD
by Fedora Release Engineering 29 Apr '15

29 Apr '15

#5984: Adding metadata to the Fedora Workstation Live CD ----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: rhughes | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 21 Beta | Component: koji Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------------+------------------------ Hi Dennis, and other rel-eng dudes! I've hit somewhat of a roadblock with this: http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2014/08/29/putting-packagekit-metadata-on- the-fedora-livecd/ Basically, I need access to the post-mash (i.e. fedora, fedora-updates) from the compose server. This allows us to put the old metadata on the Fedora LiveCD so we don't have to wait the few minutes after install to be able to search for and install new applications. I totally agree we don't want unfettered internet access, or even access to the mirror network, as I'm happy doing something like this in the fedora-live-workstation.ks file: %post --nochroot DESTDIR=$INSTALL_ROOT $INSTALL_ROOT/usr/libexec/packagekit-direct refresh --rewrite-baseurl fedora=http://some.local.ip.address/f21 --rewrite- baseurl updates=http://some.local.ip.address/f21-updates On the assumption that some.local.ip.address is available from inside the LiveCD builder and gives us access to the mash'ed *metadata* only (I don't need packages, and it can even be a few days old with no penalty). The alternative is that I ship the fedora and updates metadata in the PackageKit rpm file, which means doing a -0.01 day release of the RPM for the Live media, which makes everything so very fragile. Other ideas of course welcome. Thanks! -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5984> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 3

#5894: git branches for SCL packages
by Fedora Release Engineering 29 Apr '15

29 Apr '15

#5894: git branches for SCL packages -----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: mmaslano | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: task | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 21 Alpha | Component: git Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | -----------------------------+------------------------ I would prefer SCL packages in branches of the main package (eg ruby). We used the same approach in some internal projects and it worked well with koji, composes, everything... I suggest name of branches: scl-f21 scl-f22 -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5894> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 68

#5805: add index.asc files for cloud images for virt-builder
by Fedora Release Engineering 29 Apr '15

29 Apr '15

#5805: add index.asc files for cloud images for virt-builder ----------------------------+------------------------ Reporter: mattdm | Owner: rel-eng@… Type: enhancement | Status: new Milestone: Fedora 20 Beta | Component: other Keywords: | Blocked By: Blocking: | ----------------------------+------------------------ Please add a GPG-signed 'index.asc' file to the Fedora 20 Images/ directory describing cloud images for virt-builder and other tools. The format is documented at http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html #creating-your-own-templates, and there's actually a Fedora example there. Thanks! -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5805> Fedora Release Engineering <http://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng> Release Engineering for the Fedora Project

1 16

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

rel-eng December 2014