On 01/05/2014 09:23 AM, Mattia Verga wrote:
They really want to make dnf work this way. This is explained here: http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html#dnf-erase-kernel-deletes-all-p...
Yes, I have read that, but (strongly) disagree.
The running kernel should not be removed with a simple 'dnf erase kernel' (why did they change remove into erase?), a better solution would be to safe guard the running kernel, only removing it if you explicitly ask for it:
$ uname -a Linux tux 3.12.6-300.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Dec 23 16:44:31 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ dnf erase kernel-3.12.6-300.fc20.x86_64
The same thing could be said about other packages now protected in yum. Please protect them in the same way in dnf.
Lars