On 01/17/2018 12:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 01:02:32PM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hello, Python3 will be in the next major RHEL release. I don't mean RHEL 7.6, but with numbers higher than 7. There are many, many packages with something like the following
if 0%{?fedora} %define with_python3 1 %endif
If you have something like that, please change it to something like this.
if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} > 7 %define with_python3 1 %endif
I'll say it once again, but why can't we just have %{python2_available} and %{python3_available} macros defined in the base system?
Mostly because we can't change RHEL.
So, how about %{python2_missing} and %{python3_available}? Is that too ugly and inconsistent?