On Sun, 2014-01-05 at 12:34 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 05.01.2014 12:21, schrieb Frank Murphy:
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 12:16:36 +0100 "Lars E. Pettersson" lars@homer.se wrote:
Ah, did not know that, if you try to auto complete yum only remove shows up, but erase also works. So perhaps erase was an afterthought, to mimic the rpm behavior. If rpm has erase, and yum also can use erase, perhaps erase is the way to go, perhaps...? :)
Maybe remove was for @debian people used to "apt-get remove"?
and if developers would be more pragmatic and user-friendly this wouöd not be discussed a single second and both supported
You're losing track of the discussion. This has devolved into a sub-thread about the commands 'remove' and 'erase', it now has little to do with the call about what '[yum/dnf] [remove/erase] kernel' should do.