On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 01:02:32PM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote: I'll say it once again, but why can't we just have %{python2_available} and %{python3_available} macros defined in the base system?
And once again, what about %py3_build_expected? Proposed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636020
The most obvious argument against that is that it is not 100% bullet proof to cover all Fedora Python packages. But I don't think it is a problem in particular; there are _many_ (maybe the most of them) python packages that could use this.
Pavel