On 01/09/2014 03:56 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Jan 7, 2014 4:53 AM, "Frank Murphy" <frankly3d@gmail.com mailto:frankly3d@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:28:59 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net
mailto:h.reindl@thelounge.net> wrote:
look like it starts to happen again: a replacement which is not ready
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049310
It seems the majority want the current dnf default [1] to be kept Those who want to keep "running" kernel may need to speak up [2]
[1]
http://akozumpl.github.io/dnf/cli_vs_yum.html#dnf-erase-kernel-deletes-all-p...
After asking on the bugzilla it seems that ales would like people who want this change to cc themselves on the bug report. If the cc reaches 40 he'll reconsider. Kinda a strange way of deciding but whatever works for the maintainer I guess.
And what would be the right way to decide? And please stay assured that this is not a trolling, I would really like to see some agreement in Fedora on how to decide these kind of things.
Thanks, Jirka
-Toshio