Peter Jones wrote:
On 10/06/2010 10:08 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
On 10/6/10, Matej Cepl mcepl@redhat.com wrote:
I won't comment on the trademark issue (because that's just pure lunacy), but let me comment here "they don't accept my patches, so they are non- free". That's just nonsense ...
Yes it is, that's not the issue. They aren't letting us distribute it ourselves, unless its brand is removed or we don't make those changes.
On the contrary, distribution is the thing they *are* allowing.
He's talking about distribution WITH THE PATCHES THEY REJECTED (something pretty much ANY other upstream allows, even if they often frown upon it to some extent). So you're missing the point.
Kevin Kofler