On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:02:23AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group in graphical installers
although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a catastrophe because they are merged! I guess there is an option for hidden groups
Have these packages:
Provides: policy(adult content)
And have a package that's mandatory in your respin that has:
Conflicts: policy(adult content)
/me taking one of the good ideas from the flag debate.
Except it is obvious that something contains a flag or not.
Labeling certain content 'questionable' is going to end up being all over the distro and diluting the value of the tag.
Let me put it this way - if we start randomly rating things in a provides tag and gnaughty or hot-babe or pr0n-comfort get labeled this way then I'll make sure I personally add the same tag to:
- firefox
- yum
- sword
- gnome-sword
And every email client, because I'm spammed by countless messages offering adult content every day :-(
Daniel