I don't think you can just flag Packages as inappropriate because everyone has his own definition for that term. If you really want to make this work you'll have to create specific classifications like "nudity" or "violence" so people can make informed decisions. People might be ok with violent content but not nudity. When I see a Package marked only as "inappropriate" that doesn't help me to tell whether *I* would find that inappropriate or not.
we can use "might be" just like "be polite someone's grandma could be here" and we can list when and why and to whom
in the proposal I used the classification used by the upstream if any and I guess all of packages will fall under this. if the upstream says that his package is inappropriate then its worth listing and I guess this is the fedora way.
and if the maintainer or reviewer won't show those to his little daughter then it worth being listed
I don't demand more than that.
BTW: we have specific definitions for those terms but as I said I don't want to impose our definitions and values into fedora, our standards are so high that if something is bad according to any definition then it's bad for us :-) no I mean inspecting a list of tens of packages would be much simpler than inspecting all the tens of thousands of packages