On 05/07/2014 10:21 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Adam Jackson ajax@redhat.com said:
I don't know if I have a good suggestion here, none of the alternatives sound appealing.
Is there a compelling reason to upgrade to BDB-6 (other than 6 > 5)? The license change really seems to be a PITA, since it is incompatible with the licenses of software already using BDB-5.
We should provide some libdb officially supported by upstream, which won't be the case for libdb-5 forever. Also there may come some projects in the future that will require libdb-6 for some of its features. So, staying only with libdb-5 does not seem to be a solution for me.
Honza