Am 06.01.2014 16:12, schrieb Tomas Mlcoch:
Am 06.01.2014 14:06, schrieb Vít Ondruch:
Also, I'd like to point out that "yum/dnf remove" by default shows what it is going to do and you have to explicitly confirm the action, isn't it enough? How much protection do you need?
to say it clear - *all* protection to avoid breaking the system otherwise as example i would not have learned which packages can be removed resulting in strip down some Fedora servers to 600 MB
what *never* must happen is that YUM or DNF are killing itself, rpm or render the setup unbootable - period - there is *nothing* to discuss
Hm, so the rm should refuse to do "rm /usr/bin/rm", chmod: "chmod -x /usr/bin/chmod", etc., am I getting it right?
is "rm" supposed to work this way? is "rm" supposed to be replaced by dnf? is "rm" used to solve dependencies? is "rm" responsible for a consistent package managment?
i guess no because "rm" is not a package-manager someone tries to rewrite