Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 15:36:11 -0800 Subject: Re: dnf versus yum From: richard.vickeryrv@gmail.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 3:28 PM, yersinia yersinia.spiros@gmail.com wrote:
5 PM, poma pomidorabelisima@gmail.com wrote:
On 02.01.2014 20:36, Steve Clark wrote:
Also at least yum stood for something - Yellowdog Updater, Modified - as opposed to being some
nonsensical conglomeration of letters. The only thing I am aware of that dnf means is "did not finish".
Did Not Finish
Do Not Forget
Does Not Follow
Data Not Found
Did Not Find
Does Not Function
Do Not Freeze
Do Not Fix
Do Not Fax
Do Not Forward
poma
I do not think it is nice to speak so bad about a project. The
objective are clear,if something can be improved everyone can or must
contribute.The criticisms are useless.We are talking about open source
software, do not forget. 👍I agree
Best regards
On the contrary: speaking negatively about a project may be fine so long as the context is clearly about such project, as it is only the project that is being harshly criticised. Where a problem often occurs is when such criticism crosses over into affecting an individual.