I saw https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/texlive/ that there is not texlive for EPEL7. But in a CentOS 7 installation, if I do "yum search texlive" you get many packages. They have been simply automatically ported from the EPEL 6 repos? Why are them so less in amount, compared to the Fedora texlive-full-scheme?
On 11/20/2015 03:51 AM, Germano Massullo wrote:
I saw https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/texlive/ that there is not texlive for EPEL7. But in a CentOS 7 installation, if I do "yum search texlive" you get many packages. They have been simply automatically ported from the EPEL 6 repos? Why are them so less in amount, compared to the Fedora texlive-full-scheme?
The main texlive package lives in RHEL. For RHEL7 they stripped out a lot of packages, which made a lot of people (including myself) unhappy. A couple have been added to RHEL7.2, but now there is also texlive-extension in EPEL7 which provides some (but not all) of the missing packages.
Il 21/11/2015 04:56, Orion Poplawski ha scritto:
On 11/20/2015 03:51 AM, Germano Massullo wrote:
I saw https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/texlive/ that there is not texlive for EPEL7. But in a CentOS 7 installation, if I do "yum search texlive" you get many packages. They have been simply automatically ported from the EPEL 6 repos? Why are them so less in amount, compared to the Fedora texlive-full-scheme?
The main texlive package lives in RHEL. For RHEL7 they stripped out a lot of packages, which made a lot of people (including myself) unhappy. A couple have been added to RHEL7.2, but now there is also texlive-extension in EPEL7 which provides some (but not all) of the missing packages.
Did you try to ask them to include all TeXLive packages that are available from upstream? If not, I can try
On 11/21/2015 04:22 AM, Germano Massullo wrote:
Il 21/11/2015 04:56, Orion Poplawski ha scritto:
On 11/20/2015 03:51 AM, Germano Massullo wrote:
I saw https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/texlive/ that there is not texlive for EPEL7. But in a CentOS 7 installation, if I do "yum search texlive" you get many packages. They have been simply automatically ported from the EPEL 6 repos? Why are them so less in amount, compared to the Fedora texlive-full-scheme?
The main texlive package lives in RHEL. For RHEL7 they stripped out a lot of packages, which made a lot of people (including myself) unhappy. A couple have been added to RHEL7.2, but now there is also texlive-extension in EPEL7 which provides some (but not all) of the missing packages.
Did you try to ask them to include all TeXLive packages that are available from upstream? If not, I can try
I've asked for some specific ones that I need, and it looks like others have too:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=%3Atexlive-extension&...
On Sat, 21 Nov 2015, Germano Massullo wrote:
Did you try to ask them to include all TeXLive packages that are available from upstream? If not, I can try
there are lots of licenses to audit, per sub-package, and dependency trees of matter limited to non-commercial and so forth
-- Russ herrold
Il 23/11/2015 23:22, R P Herrold ha scritto:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2015, Germano Massullo wrote:
Did you try to ask them to include all TeXLive packages that are available from upstream? If not, I can try
there are lots of licenses to audit, per sub-package, and dependency trees of matter limited to non-commercial and so forth
-- Russ herrold
You can simply re use the collection of texlive-scheme-full for Fedora (non EPEL)
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Germano Massullo -
Orion Poplawski -
R P Herrold