Hi,
I have a job failed because of a bug with selinux-policy-devel-2.4.6-104.el5.
selinux-policy-devel-2.4.6-106.el5_1.3 seems ok.
Why the builder doesn't use the latest update ?
Remi.
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:33:50 +0100, Remi Collet wrote:
Hi,
I have a job failed because of a bug with selinux-policy-devel-2.4.6-104.el5.
selinux-policy-devel-2.4.6-106.el5_1.3 seems ok.
Why the builder doesn't use the latest update ?
I think the answer is in one of the EPEL steering committee meeting logs. So far, RHEL has been made available on the build servers manually. There's no RHN entitlement used yet, and updates are not pulled into the build root repos automatically.
Michael Schwendt a écrit :
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:33:50 +0100, Remi Collet wrote:
Hi,
I have a job failed because of a bug with selinux-policy-devel-2.4.6-104.el5.
selinux-policy-devel-2.4.6-106.el5_1.3 seems ok.
Why the builder doesn't use the latest update ?
I think the answer is in one of the EPEL steering committee meeting logs. So far, RHEL has been made available on the build servers manually. There's no RHN entitlement used yet, and updates are not pulled into the build root repos automatically.
Is there a way to ask for this package to be updated or should I build my package without SELinux stuff ?
Regards and Happy new year to all the Fedora Team.
Remi.
Hi!
Sorry for the late answer.
On 01.01.2008 09:15, Remi Collet wrote:
Michael Schwendt a écrit :
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:33:50 +0100, Remi Collet wrote:
I have a job failed because of a bug with selinux-policy-devel-2.4.6-104.el5. selinux-policy-devel-2.4.6-106.el5_1.3 seems ok. Why the builder doesn't use the latest update ?
I think the answer is in one of the EPEL steering committee meeting logs. So far, RHEL has been made available on the build servers manually. There's no RHN entitlement used yet, and updates are not pulled into the build root repos automatically.
Is there a way to ask for this package to be updated or should I build my package without SELinux stuff ?
I saw that you disabled selinux-support for now in glpi, which might be the best for now. Mike is looking into getting the RH updates into the buildroots for EPEL; see:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/327#preview
So hopefully over the next few days/weeks we should get a automatic way which tracks in the RHN-updates into the buildroot.
CU knurd
On 04.01.2008 20:57, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 01.01.2008 09:15, Remi Collet wrote:
Michael Schwendt a écrit :
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 18:33:50 +0100, Remi Collet wrote:
I have a job failed because of a bug with selinux-policy-devel-2.4.6-104.el5. selinux-policy-devel-2.4.6-106.el5_1.3 seems ok. Why the builder doesn't use the latest update ?
I think the answer is in one of the EPEL steering committee meeting logs. So far, RHEL has been made available on the build servers manually. There's no RHN entitlement used yet, and updates are not pulled into the build root repos automatically.
Is there a way to ask for this package to be updated or should I build my package without SELinux stuff ?
I saw that you disabled selinux-support for now in glpi, which might be the best for now. Mike is looking into getting the RH updates into the buildroots for EPEL; see: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/327#preview
Skvidal made this happen in the past days. Remi, could you give it a try to see if everything works as you need it for SELinux support in glpi?
Cu knurd
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Michael Schwendt -
Remi Collet -
Thorsten Leemhuis