Hi
First off if this is the wrong place to post I'll apologise in advance.
I tried the installation of R2.9.0 a quick try and noticed it has dependancies on the newer texlive packages. Are there any plans to get these across into EPEL also? I could only see them listed in the later fedora 11 testing release.
Thanks Bryan
On Wed, 2009-04-29 at 09:04 +0100, Bryan Hepworth wrote:
Hi
First off if this is the wrong place to post I'll apologise in advance.
I tried the installation of R2.9.0 a quick try and noticed it has dependancies on the newer texlive packages. Are there any plans to get these across into EPEL also? I could only see them listed in the later fedora 11 testing release.
I don't think it's possible: tetex is in RHEL and EPEL packages must not clash with upstream.
Maybe in RHEL6?
On 04/29/2009 04:04 AM, Bryan Hepworth wrote:
Hi
First off if this is the wrong place to post I'll apologise in advance.
I tried the installation of R2.9.0 a quick try and noticed it has dependancies on the newer texlive packages. Are there any plans to get these across into EPEL also? I could only see them listed in the later fedora 11 testing release.
Grr, that's not right. Let me go fix that.
~spot
On 04/29/2009 03:23 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On 04/29/2009 04:04 AM, Bryan Hepworth wrote:
Hi
First off if this is the wrong place to post I'll apologise in advance.
I tried the installation of R2.9.0 a quick try and noticed it has dependancies on the newer texlive packages. Are there any plans to get these across into EPEL also? I could only see them listed in the later fedora 11 testing release.
Grr, that's not right. Let me go fix that.
Everything should now be fixed in the 1.el4.1 and 1.el5.1 builds I just kicked off.
~spot
-----Original Message----- From: epel-devel-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:epel-devel-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Tom "spot" Callaway Sent: 29 April 2009 21:26 To: EPEL development disccusion Subject: Re: R2.9.0 in testing, texlive dependancies
On 04/29/2009 03:23 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On 04/29/2009 04:04 AM, Bryan Hepworth wrote:
Hi
First off if this is the wrong place to post I'll apologise
in advance.
I tried the installation of R2.9.0 a quick try and noticed
it has dependancies on the newer texlive packages. Are there any plans to get these across into EPEL also? I could only see them listed in the later fedora 11 testing release.
Grr, that's not right. Let me go fix that.
Everything should now be fixed in the 1.el4.1 and 1.el5.1 builds I just kicked off.
~spot
Tom
Cheers for that, I'll give it another whirl in the morning.
Not wanting to push my luck *too* far, I also noticed it was looking for vi - I was oblivious to the fact that the vi I always fire up is infact vim. I couldn't find a vi package in rhel5 to address this one..
Thanks
Bry
On 04/29/2009 05:37 PM, Bryan Hepworth wrote:
Not wanting to push my luck *too* far, I also noticed it was looking for vi - I was oblivious to the fact that the vi I always fire up is infact vim. I couldn't find a vi package in rhel5 to address this one..
Yeah, I caught that one too and fixed it at the same time. ;)
~spot
-----Original Message----- From: epel-devel-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:epel-devel-list-bounces@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Tom "spot" Callaway Sent: 29 April 2009 23:16 To: EPEL development disccusion Subject: Re: R2.9.0 in testing, texlive dependancies
On 04/29/2009 05:37 PM, Bryan Hepworth wrote:
Not wanting to push my luck *too* far, I also noticed it was
looking for vi - I was oblivious to the fact that the vi I always fire up is infact vim. I couldn't find a vi package in rhel5 to address this one..
Yeah, I caught that one too and fixed it at the same time. ;)
~spot
Tom
That all worked ticketyboo for me this morning :-)
Thanks for that.
Bry
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org