On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Orion Poplawski orion@cora.nwra.com wrote:

On 12/30/2015 10:00 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:

...

On 12/30/2015 12:16 AM, Denis Fateyev wrote:

...

Actually, I've opened a bug against 'msgpack': https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290393

...

...

Some reviews are underway here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1294704&hide_resol...

If we just could work "the same SRPMS name" problem around ;-) Healthy repos with the master branch orphaned [1] may look a little weird to users...

Just think, maybe worth to include some info that "this package for epel only" into package description, additionally?

[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python3-setuptools/

So what should package maintainers do? I modified a package to use python3_pkgversion and it builds fine if with_python3 is set, but it doesn't seem to be set in the EPEL 7 build environment. I noticed a couple packages enable it by default. Is that what we should be doing? Or should we just build it into python/python3_epel7 in copr for now, and it so how?

Avram

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III tibbs@math.uh.edu wrote:

...

...

...

...

...

"DF" == Denis Fateyev denis@fateyev.com writes:

DF> If we just could work "the same SRPMS name" problem around ;-) DF> Healthy repos with the master branch orphaned [1] may look a little DF> weird to users...

That is not abnormal for EPEL-only packages, though. The dead.package file in master should simply indicate that the package is EPEL-only.

• J<

---

python-devel mailing list python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject....