glibc January 2017

glibc@lists.fedoraproject.org

3 participants
4 discussions

rawhide build currently broken
by Florian Weimer 12 Jan '17

12 Jan '17

The i686 build fails with: gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -r -o /builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/librtld.os '-Wl,-(' /builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/dl-allobjs.os /builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/rtld-libc.a -lgcc '-Wl,-)' \ -Wl,-Map,/builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/librtld.os.map gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -shared -o /builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/ld.so.new \ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--hash-style=both -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-z,now \ /builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/librtld.os -Wl,--version-script=/builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/ld.map \ -Wl,-soname=ld-linux.so.2 \ -Wl,-defsym=_begin=0 /builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/librtld.os: In function `getenv': /builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/stdlib/getenv.c:84: undefined reference to `strncmp' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [Makefile:460: /builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/build-i686-redhat-linux/elf/ld.so] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/glibc-2.24-592-g73dfd08/elf' I can reproduce it upstream with this configure invocation: ../git/configure --prefix=/usr CC="gcc -m32" CFLAGS="-O3 -g" CXX="g++ -m32" CXXFLAGS="-O3" --enable-tunables --enable-stack-protector=strong --build=i686-linux I believe it was introduced by the tunables changes. Unfortunately, I probably won't have a chance to fix this until 2017-01-04. Thanks, Florian

3 7

Re: Will glibc 2.24.90 go to Fedora 25?
by Florian Weimer 05 Jan '17

05 Jan '17

On 01/05/2017 02:51 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 5.1.2017 14:48, Florian Weimer wrote: >> On 01/05/2017 02:46 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'd like to know if glibc 2.24.90 (or newer) will ever be pushed down to >>> Fedora 25 or even 24. >>> >>> Juts to be clear: I'm not asking you to do it, I just want to know. >> >> No, Fedora 25 and 24 are stuck at 2.24 and 2.23, with backports as >> needed. > Thanks. >> >> Why do you ask? Do you need a specific feature? > On the contrary, I was making sure this bug [0] will only need patches > in rawhide. > > [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410175 Ah, right. This only needs to be fixed in rawhide. Thanks, Florian

1 0

Fwd: Re: Will glibc 2.24.90 go to Fedora 25?
by Florian Weimer 05 Jan '17

05 Jan '17

FYI. -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Re: Will glibc 2.24.90 go to Fedora 25? Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:48:09 +0100 From: Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com> To: Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com>, glibc(a)fedoraproject.org CC: Tomas Orsava <torsava(a)redhat.com> On 01/05/2017 02:46 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to know if glibc 2.24.90 (or newer) will ever be pushed down to > Fedora 25 or even 24. > > Juts to be clear: I'm not asking you to do it, I just want to know. No, Fedora 25 and 24 are stuck at 2.24 and 2.23, with backports as needed. Why do you ask? Do you need a specific feature? Thanks, Florian

1 0

Re: rawhide build currently broken
by Siddhesh Poyarekar 02 Jan '17

02 Jan '17

1 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

glibc January 2017