mingw July 2010

mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org

5 participants
49 discussions

[Bug 599567] New: mingw32-gcc should not drag in mingw32-pthreads
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 Feb '15

18 Feb '15

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw32-gcc should not drag in mingw32-pthreads https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599567 Summary: mingw32-gcc should not drag in mingw32-pthreads Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-gcc AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: eblake(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, kalev(a)smartlink.ee, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: mingw32-gcc currently drags in a dependency on mingw32-pthreads, which in turn forces some namespace pollution due to its buggy <pthread.h> header. It would be much nicer if the mingw32-pthreads package remained optional, since it can interfere with cross-compilation efforts to mingw. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-gcc-4.4.2-2.fc13.x86_64 mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-10.fc13.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install mingw32-gcc Actual results: mingw32-pthreads gets sucked in as a required dependency to the cross-compiler. Expected results: Mere presence of the cross-compiler shouldn't force the existence of a broken <pthread.h>. Either the compiler needs to be built without mingw32-pthreads, or mingw32-pthreads needs to be split into two packages (runtime dependency of the compiler, vs. development library that installs <pthread.h> for situations that actually want to use this library in spite of its current upstream flaws). Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 604702] New: Custom Fedora patch to mingw32-libjpeg breaks API
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Feb '12

28 Feb '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Custom Fedora patch to mingw32-libjpeg breaks API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604702 Summary: Custom Fedora patch to mingw32-libjpeg breaks API Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-libjpeg AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: adam(a)spicenitz.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: The resolution of bug #497492 creates a source incompatible fork of libjpeg that is not even compatible with the native libjpeg! Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-libjpeg-7-2.fc12.noarch Steps to Reproduce: 1. Try to compile libtiff with standard Fedora configure, make. 2. Now try to compile libtiff with mingw32-configure, mingw32-make. Actual results: tif_jpeg.c:289: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before 'boolean' etc. I don't think we should fork libjpeg in Fedora. Bug #497492 should be reopened and the programs that crash should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 13

Fwd: Goocanvas for Mingw32
by Richard W.M. Jones 28 Jan '12

28 Jan '12

Thanks Egil, I am forwarding your message and the spec file to the fedora-mingw mailing list. I looked quickly over the spec file and it looks good. Rich. ----- Forwarded message from Egil Kvaleberg <egil(a)kvaleberg.com> ----- Subject: Goocanvas for Mingw32 Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:54:27 +0200 From: Egil Kvaleberg <egil(a)kvaleberg.com> To: rjones(a)redhat.com I have played around with the Mingw32 for Fedora, and it absolutely seems like a very cool thing. For my purposes, I am using GTK2, which is supported, but I also need a canvas. I have been using Goocanvas (not sure what really is *the* canvas for GTK2, but I have been happy with Goocanvas). However, a Goocanvas package does not seem to be available, so I built one. Goocanvas may be of interest to others, so if you think it is suitable then please use the attached spec-file or tell me how to get involved. The spec-file for Fedora 11 is attached. Sincerely, Egil Kvaleberg -- Company: Kvaleberg AS Office: +47 22 44 31 75 Mobile: +47 920 22 780 Fax: +47 22 44 46 77 Web: http://www.kvaleberg.com/ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v

3 4

[Bug 489100] New: No cross-DLL exceptions in mingw32 compilers
by Red Hat Bugzilla 29 Dec '11

29 Dec '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: No cross-DLL exceptions in mingw32 compilers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489100 Summary: No cross-DLL exceptions in mingw32 compilers Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: low Component: mingw32-gcc AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: wolfgang.glas(a)ev-i.at QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Version 4.3.2-12 of EPEL's version of the moingw32 cross-compiler do not support cross-DLL exceptions. I've attached the gcc bug report below. This make running a non-trivial C++ program impossible an renders the mingw32 toolchain unusable for real-world C++ programs. The mingw-w64 toolchain has solved this problem by supplying a shared libgcc, hopefully the mingw32 toolchain will follow this approach in the near future. Please keep on your tremendous work on providing the ming32 toolchain in the EPEL. TIA, Wolfgang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 609162] New: CVE-2010-2249 libpng: Memory leak when processing Physical Scale (sCAL) images [fedora-all]
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Jun '11

27 Jun '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: CVE-2010-2249 libpng: Memory leak when processing Physical Scale (sCAL) images [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609162 Summary: CVE-2010-2249 libpng: Memory leak when processing Physical Scale (sCAL) images [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking Severity: low Priority: low Component: mingw32-libpng AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jlieskov(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 608644 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora versions. For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field. Forr more information see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs When creating a Bodhi update request, please include the bug IDs of the respective parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product. Please mention CVE ids in the RPM changelog when available. Bodhi update submission link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=608644 Please note: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. Only one tracking bug has been filed; please only close it when all affected versions are fixed. [bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 5

[Bug 571686] New: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped
by Red Hat Bugzilla 18 May '11

18 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=571686 Summary: mingw32 produced DLL's are not stripped Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-filesystem AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: waananen(a)nbi.dk QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Even if the specfile includes: %define __strip %{_mingw32_strip} mingw32 cross-compiled packages does not get their DLL's or binaries stripped. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): Checked with: mingw32-filesystem-56-1 How reproducible: Very easy to reproduce by building a mingw32 package. Also official Fedora mingw32 packages are not stripped either - I tested the package: mingw32-pixman-0.14.0-1.fc11. Steps to Reproduce: 1. cp -p /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll /tmp 2. i686-pc-mingw32-strip /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll Actual results: # ls -1s /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 252 /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 1252 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll Expected results: # ls -1s /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 252 /tmp/libpixman-1-0.dll 252 /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/libpixman-1-0.dll Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 8

[Bug 599227] New: mingw <pthread.h> is broken
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 May '11

12 May '11

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: mingw <pthread.h> is broken https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599227 Summary: mingw <pthread.h> is broken Product: Fedora Version: 13 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: mingw32-pthreads AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: eblake(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: lfarkas(a)lfarkas.org, berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: The cross-compilation header /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pthread.h, installed as part of the mingw32-pthreads package, has several coding bugs. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-10.fc13.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Try cross-compiling any code that uses localtime_r with a second argument with side effects, or try calling (localtime_r)(arg1,arg2). 2. Try cross-compiling any project that uses gnulib's <time.h> replacement header (libvirt is an example project; it includes a ./autobuild.sh script that will automatically try a mingw cross-compilation, if you have installed a mingw portablexdr library, although that library is not yet part of fedora). Actual results: The definition of localtime_r is broken, because it evaluates the second argument twice. And, since POSIX allows one to #undef localtime_r, but there is no localtime_r function in the library, you get a link failure if you bypass the function-like macro. Finally, the pthreads-win32 library made the mistake of installing <config.h>, which is asking for namespace collision with most other autotooled packages. Expected results: <pthread.h> should not define any *_r functions, nor should it interfere with a proper <time.h>. Also, the library should not install <config.h>, but should instead modify its installed headers to be self-contained. Additional info: See this thread on bug-gnulib for more details: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-06/msg00007.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

nspr: fix for mock build
by Amorilia 07 May '11

07 May '11

Hi everyone, Here's a fix for the build problem for nspr in mock: http://github.com/amorilia/fedora-mingw/commit/1c143a5840bb15b11098edb7130e… It seems that the problem goes back all the way to AC_PROG_CC: when wine is installed, apparently AC_PROG_CC (mistakenly?) sets cross_compiler to false. Additionally, here's a sync of the spec file with the native fedora one, and a few extra build patches: http://github.com/amorilia/fedora-mingw/commit/19af2a48f6d2cc90009c581a7e8a… http://github.com/amorilia/fedora-mingw/commit/629eb75b24e1755c92041b614b40… http://github.com/amorilia/fedora-mingw/commit/44031e8cf4d0149debeb97c0c833… Although the tests build, when running them under wine, many fail. I haven't investigated this further. I don't plan to work on this anymore for the time being, so I'm simply throwing these patches here in case someone else would be interested. For quick reference, full spec file and patches: http://github.com/amorilia/fedora-mingw/tree/master/nspr/ Yours, Amorilia

2 1

[Bug 499992] New: Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 17 Dec '10

17 Dec '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora(a)vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: notting(a)redhat.com, fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Depends on: 499983,499986,499991 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-WebKit.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-WebKit-1.1.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: WebKit is an open source web browser engine. Koji scratch build: none for now because mingw32-libsoup, mingw32-libxslt and mingw32-libidn aren't in Fedora yet Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

3 29

[Bug 539698] New: debuginfo package conflict between binutils and mingw32-binutils
by Red Hat Bugzilla 03 Dec '10

03 Dec '10

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: debuginfo package conflict between binutils and mingw32-binutils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539698 Summary: debuginfo package conflict between binutils and mingw32-binutils Product: Fedora Version: 12 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: mingw32-binutils AssignedTo: rjones(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: jarin.franek(a)post.cz QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: berrange(a)redhat.com, rjones(a)redhat.com, fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Trying to install both binutils debuginfo and mingw32-binutils debuginfo packages (In fact, I did install debuginfo for the whole distribution). The transaction check fails with a conflict. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mingw32-binutils-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 binutils-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 How reproducible: see the steps: Steps to Reproduce: 1. debuginfo-install binutils 2. debuginfo-install mingw32-binutils Actual results: ----------------------------------------snippet Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/bfd/elf.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/bfd/elfcode.h from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/bfd/section.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/gas/dw2gencfi.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 file /usr/src/debug/binutils-2.19.51.0.14/ld/ldmain.c from install of mingw32-binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-1.fc12.x86_64 conflicts with file from package binutils-debuginfo-2.19.51.0.14-34.fc12.x86_64 Error Summary ------------- ----------------------------------------snippet Expected results: No conflict. Since both binutils and mingw32-binutils install in-parallel without problems, I would expect their debuginfo packages to install in-parallel as well. Additional info: May concern other mingw32-* packages as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw July 2010