Hi!
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 10:52, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your package will be retired when the affected package gets retired.
Request package ownership via releng issues: https://pagure.io/releng/issues
Full report available at: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-11-25.txt grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.
To save time looking this up, I want to direct the attention of pmix and openmpi maintainers (Cc'd) to this chain:
munge (orphaned) -> pmix -> openmpi
In short, anything that depends on openmpi is at risk of being retired.
Package (co)maintainers Status Change================================================================================
[...]
munge orphan 1 weeks ago
[...]
Regards, Dominik
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 11:38:42 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi!
<snip>
To save time looking this up, I want to direct the attention of pmix and openmpi maintainers (Cc'd) to this chain:
munge (orphaned) -> pmix -> openmpi
In short, anything that depends on openmpi is at risk of being retired.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pmix says it's owned by pkfed at the moment. So is this sorted? Otherwise I can take it up to keep it alive (and the NeuroFedora team can help maintain it).
Should we perhaps have a FAS packager group for scitech too, so we can help maintain packages as a team? Would that help? We do this for the NeuroSIG[1] and it works quote well.
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/group/neuro-sig
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 12:45, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 11:38:42 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi!
<snip>
To save time looking this up, I want to direct the attention of pmix and openmpi maintainers (Cc'd) to this chain:
munge (orphaned) -> pmix -> openmpi
In short, anything that depends on openmpi is at risk of being retired.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pmix says it's owned by pkfed at the moment. So is this sorted? Otherwise I can take it up to keep it alive (and the NeuroFedora team can help maintain it).
No. pmix is not orphaned, but munge is. I checked upstream and the last release is over 2 years old, but the last commit at github is from May this year, so it looks like upstream is still alive. I don't have time to take up yet another package, though.
Should we perhaps have a FAS packager group for scitech too, so we can help maintain packages as a team? Would that help? We do this for the NeuroSIG[1] and it works quote well.
Yes, it's a good idea. Would you be willing to take care of that?
Regards, Dominik
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 13:26:20 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 12:45, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 11:38:42 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi!
<snip>
To save time looking this up, I want to direct the attention of pmix and openmpi maintainers (Cc'd) to this chain:
munge (orphaned) -> pmix -> openmpi
In short, anything that depends on openmpi is at risk of being retired.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pmix says it's owned by pkfed at the moment. So is this sorted? Otherwise I can take it up to keep it alive (and the NeuroFedora team can help maintain it).
No. pmix is not orphaned, but munge is. I checked upstream and the last release is over 2 years old, but the last commit at github is from May this year, so it looks like upstream is still alive. I don't have time to take up yet another package, though.
Ugh, Sorry! I read that wrong XD
I've requested ownership of `munge` now: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9052
Should we perhaps have a FAS packager group for scitech too, so we can help maintain packages as a team? Would that help? We do this for the NeuroSIG[1] and it works quote well.
Yes, it's a good idea. Would you be willing to take care of that?
Sure---if everyone is aboard this plan (Cc'd orion, who is the owner of the group), how should we do this? There's a FAS group for scitech already. Is this being used for anything currently? If not, we can clean this out and request that it be converted to a packager group.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/members/scitech/
On 11/25/19 5:50 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 13:26:20 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 12:45, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 11:38:42 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Hi!
<snip>
To save time looking this up, I want to direct the attention of pmix and openmpi maintainers (Cc'd) to this chain:
munge (orphaned) -> pmix -> openmpi
In short, anything that depends on openmpi is at risk of being retired.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pmix says it's owned by pkfed at the moment. So is this sorted? Otherwise I can take it up to keep it alive (and the NeuroFedora team can help maintain it).
No. pmix is not orphaned, but munge is. I checked upstream and the last release is over 2 years old, but the last commit at github is from May this year, so it looks like upstream is still alive. I don't have time to take up yet another package, though.
Ugh, Sorry! I read that wrong XD
I've requested ownership of `munge` now: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9052
Should we perhaps have a FAS packager group for scitech too, so we can help maintain packages as a team? Would that help? We do this for the NeuroSIG[1] and it works quote well.
Yes, it's a good idea. Would you be willing to take care of that?
Sure---if everyone is aboard this plan (Cc'd orion, who is the owner of the group), how should we do this? There's a FAS group for scitech already. Is this being used for anything currently? If not, we can clean this out and request that it be converted to a packager group.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/members/scitech/
Currently it handles permissions for the scitech copr group. I'm not sure why this would need to be cleaned out before converting to a package group. I'd be happy to see it become a packager group.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 07:29:39 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
<snip> > Sure---if everyone is aboard this plan (Cc'd orion, who is the owner of > the group), how should we do this? There's a FAS group for scitech > already. Is this being used for anything currently? If not, we can > clean this out and request that it be converted to a packager group. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/members/scitech/
Currently it handles permissions for the scitech copr group. I'm not sure why this would need to be cleaned out before converting to a package group.
From what I understand, once the scitech FAS group turns into a packager group, only folks that are in the packager group can also be part of this one. So, if all current members are already packagers, we don't need to do anything. If the current group has folks that are not in packagers, they will either need to be sponsored there or removed from the scitech group.
I'd be happy to see it become a packager group.
Great, thanks. I filed an issue with infra here: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8413
On Monday, 25 November 2019 at 16:09, Ankur Sinha wrote: [...]
From what I understand, once the scitech FAS group turns into a packager group, only folks that are in the packager group can also be part of this one. So, if all current members are already packagers, we don't need to do anything. If the current group has folks that are not in packagers, they will either need to be sponsored there or removed from the scitech group.
I'd be happy to see it become a packager group.
Great, thanks. I filed an issue with infra here: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8413
Alright, so we have a new group called scitech_sig created. Any idea how I can assign it as admin or committer of my packages? I tried doing that for arpack and it won't show scitech_sig in the list of assignable users.
Regards, Dominik
On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 12:31:04 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Alright, so we have a new group called scitech_sig created. Any idea how I can assign it as admin or committer of my packages? I tried doing that for arpack and it won't show scitech_sig in the list of assignable users.
I think we need to wait until an ML is created and assigned to the group too. @pingou said:
"That being said, you should not (must not) add this group to any package before you create a bugzilla account for it (likely a private mailing list) and set the email address of that account as being the Mailing List."
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8413#comment-614300
I'll set all that up once the ML has been created and announce these changes.
Hi everyone,
After all the setup etc. I seemed to have forgotten to add munge to the scitech SIG's packages XD. I've done that now, and am working on updating it to the latest release: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/munge/pull-request/2#
All our packages are here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/group/scitech_sig
scitech@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Ankur Sinha -
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski -
Orion Poplawski