At Today's meeting we discussed a perception issue with the WG and we decided we should write something about ti to try to correct the shot.
Here is a first attempt at addressing the core arguments.
Simo.
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 12:07 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
At Today's meeting we discussed a perception issue with the WG and we decided we should write something about ti to try to correct the shot.
Here is a first attempt at addressing the core arguments.
Looks pretty good. I've tweaked some of the wording and have a second draft attached now. The only thing I'm not certain about is the first two lines. Simo, were those meant to be the blog title and first line?
Maybe instead title it: "Fedora Server Working <strikeout>for</strikeout> With You"
Thoughts?
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:30:47 -0500 Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 12:07 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
At Today's meeting we discussed a perception issue with the WG and we decided we should write something about ti to try to correct the shot.
Here is a first attempt at addressing the core arguments.
Looks pretty good. I've tweaked some of the wording and have a second draft attached now. The only thing I'm not certain about is the first two lines. Simo, were those meant to be the blog title and first line?
Yes, I should have made that clearer.
Maybe instead title it: "Fedora Server Working <strikeout>for</strikeout> With You"
Thoughts?
I liked my proposal, and I am not sure yours "captures the eye", but I am not communication experts so I am open to any change.
Simo.
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 14:35 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:30:47 -0500 Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 12:07 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
At Today's meeting we discussed a perception issue with the WG and we decided we should write something about ti to try to correct the shot.
Here is a first attempt at addressing the core arguments.
Looks pretty good. I've tweaked some of the wording and have a second draft attached now. The only thing I'm not certain about is the first two lines. Simo, were those meant to be the blog title and first line?
Yes, I should have made that clearer.
Maybe instead title it: "Fedora Server Working <strikeout>for</strikeout> With You"
Thoughts?
I liked my proposal, and I am not sure yours "captures the eye", but I am not communication experts so I am open to any change.
I'm no communication expert either, but "Who matters?" sounds kind of like "Who cares?" to me. I worry that it sends the wrong sort of capture-the-eye message. I'm certainly open to something better than my counter-proposal, though. It was kind of off-the-cuff.
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 14:35 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2014 14:30:47 -0500 Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 12:07 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
At Today's meeting we discussed a perception issue with the WG and we decided we should write something about ti to try to correct the shot.
Here is a first attempt at addressing the core arguments.
Looks pretty good. I've tweaked some of the wording and have a second draft attached now. The only thing I'm not certain about is the first two lines. Simo, were those meant to be the blog title and first line?
Yes, I should have made that clearer.
Maybe instead title it: "Fedora Server Working <strikeout>for</strikeout> With You"
Thoughts?
I liked my proposal, and I am not sure yours "captures the eye", but I am not communication experts so I am open to any change.
I'm no communication expert either, but "Who matters?" sounds kind of like "Who cares?" to me. I worry that it sends the wrong sort of capture-the-eye message. I'm certainly open to something better than my counter-proposal, though. It was kind of off-the-cuff.
I think it would be good to highlight what entails as "boring stuff". Probably rewrite / shorten the second paragraph as well... From my point of view, when coming into the WG I was greeted with open arms from everyone (Even though I was new to the Linux / OSS community as a whole and interacting with them). Even so, I was able to impact the WG (At least I think I do.) by doing TC's, organizing a test-day, and talking about a DE for F22 (Even though it fell through we where still able to come up with some improvements for F22 in spite of that.) and this was only within a 2-3 months span. Also I'm just a regular WG member... So what I'm trying to say, you don't need a "voting privilege" to have an impact in this WG.
server@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
John Unland -
Simo Sorce -
Stephen Gallagher