-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
This week, I'd like to put the D-BUS API Role Infrastructure back on the agenda. I've been speaking with Thomas Woerner (author of firewalld) and he is interested in building this Role API for us (with tight integration with firewalld) and would like to join us for this meeting so we can bring him up to speed on exactly how we want the API to look and function. I expect this to take most of our alotted hour, but if there are other important agenda items, please submit them and we'll plan accordingly.
Thank you very much.
On Mon, 2014-04-28 at 08:41 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
This week, I'd like to put the D-BUS API Role Infrastructure back on the agenda. I've been speaking with Thomas Woerner (author of firewalld) and he is interested in building this Role API for us (with tight integration with firewalld) and would like to join us for this meeting so we can bring him up to speed on exactly how we want the API to look and function. I expect this to take most of our alotted hour, but if there are other important agenda items, please submit them and we'll plan accordingly.
+1
Simo.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.comwrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
This week, I'd like to put the D-BUS API Role Infrastructure back on the agenda. I've been speaking with Thomas Woerner (author of firewalld) and he is interested in building this Role API for us (with tight integration with firewalld) and would like to join us for this meeting so we can bring him up to speed on exactly how we want the API to look and function. I expect this to take most of our alotted hour, but if there are other important agenda items, please submit them and we'll plan accordingly.
Thank you very much. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlNeTGsACgkQeiVVYja6o6PvrwCghNVgoIpIDodQT4OY26a+yPjw x2gAmgPonT1dYYPP1VLov4UNCQIlrIur =WJ2r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ server mailing list server@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server
I made the suggestion to publish some sample kickstarts and document their use not long ago, but didn't get much response on the list. Can this be added to the agenda and discussed, please? I would *like* to attend the meeting, but can't make a commitment.
--Pete
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2014 10:42 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@redhat.com mailto:sgallagh@redhat.com> wrote:
This week, I'd like to put the D-BUS API Role Infrastructure back on the agenda. I've been speaking with Thomas Woerner (author of firewalld) and he is interested in building this Role API for us (with tight integration with firewalld) and would like to join us for this meeting so we can bring him up to speed on exactly how we want the API to look and function. I expect this to take most of our alotted hour, but if there are other important agenda items, please submit them and we'll plan accordingly.
Thank you very much. _______________________________________________ server mailing list server@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:server@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server
I made the suggestion to publish some sample kickstarts and document their use not long ago, but didn't get much response on the list. Can this be added to the agenda and discussed, please? I would *like* to attend the meeting, but can't make a commitment.
This is certainly a useful idea to suggest to the documentation team. I don't know that there's much to discuss about it on the meeting, unless someone wants to suggest that this is not a good idea.
I don't think we want to be "supporting" any kickstarts, though. Examples are good, but I don't think shipping pre-built kickstarts will be sensible or useful (given that most deployments need to customize anyway).
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.comwrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2014 10:42 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@redhat.com mailto:sgallagh@redhat.com> wrote:
This week, I'd like to put the D-BUS API Role Infrastructure back on the agenda. I've been speaking with Thomas Woerner (author of firewalld) and he is interested in building this Role API for us (with tight integration with firewalld) and would like to join us for this meeting so we can bring him up to speed on exactly how we want the API to look and function. I expect this to take most of our alotted hour, but if there are other important agenda items, please submit them and we'll plan accordingly.
Thank you very much. _______________________________________________ server mailing list server@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:server@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server
I made the suggestion to publish some sample kickstarts and document their use not long ago, but didn't get much response on the list. Can this be added to the agenda and discussed, please? I would *like* to attend the meeting, but can't make a commitment.
This is certainly a useful idea to suggest to the documentation team. I don't know that there's much to discuss about it on the meeting, unless someone wants to suggest that this is not a good idea.
I don't think we want to be "supporting" any kickstarts, though. Examples are good, but I don't think shipping pre-built kickstarts will be sensible or useful (given that most deployments need to customize anyway). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlNea2oACgkQeiVVYja6o6OOLACfSsC5xb7knmmDzzAIKjmxQlrZ bP4An0ufyKk6juoe8W/Zad7d1PJy1Ouy =Y8uR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ server mailing list server@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server
Consider this a suggestion *from* the documentation team. Having examples and some documentation on adjusting them was the idea. I thought it would be prudent to keep the working group in the discussion, instead of writing the documentation independently :)
--Pete
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2014 11:05 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@redhat.com mailto:sgallagh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 04/28/2014 10:42 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@redhat.com mailto:sgallagh@redhat.com
<mailto:sgallagh@redhat.com mailto:sgallagh@redhat.com>> wrote:
This week, I'd like to put the D-BUS API Role Infrastructure back on the agenda. I've been speaking with Thomas Woerner (author of firewalld) and he is interested in building this Role API for us (with tight integration with firewalld) and would like to join us for this meeting so we can bring him up to speed on exactly how we want the API to look and function. I expect this to take most of our alotted hour, but if there are other important agenda items, please submit them and we'll plan accordingly.
Thank you very much. _______________________________________________ server mailing list server@lists.fedoraproject.org
mailto:server@lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:server@lists.fedoraproject.org
mailto:server@lists.fedoraproject.org>
I made the suggestion to publish some sample kickstarts and document their use not long ago, but didn't get much response on the list. Can this be added to the agenda and discussed, please? I would *like* to attend the meeting, but can't make a commitment.
This is certainly a useful idea to suggest to the documentation team. I don't know that there's much to discuss about it on the meeting, unless someone wants to suggest that this is not a good idea.
I don't think we want to be "supporting" any kickstarts, though. Examples are good, but I don't think shipping pre-built kickstarts will be sensible or useful (given that most deployments need to customize anyway). _______________________________________________ server mailing list server@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:server@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server
Consider this a suggestion *from* the documentation team. Having examples and some documentation on adjusting them was the idea. I thought it would be prudent to keep the working group in the discussion, instead of writing the documentation independently :)
Ah, gotcha. Yes, we will likely generate a few example kickstarts as part of testing this functionality. We should probably make sure that the QA and Docs folks are sharing these between them.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.comwrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2014 11:05 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@redhat.com mailto:sgallagh@redhat.com> wrote:
On 04/28/2014 10:42 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 6:41 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@redhat.com mailto:sgallagh@redhat.com
<mailto:sgallagh@redhat.com mailto:sgallagh@redhat.com>> wrote:
This week, I'd like to put the D-BUS API Role Infrastructure back on the agenda. I've been speaking with Thomas Woerner (author of firewalld) and he is interested in building this Role API for us (with tight integration with firewalld) and would like to join us for this meeting so we can bring him up to speed on exactly how we want the API to look and function. I expect this to take most of our alotted hour, but if there are other important agenda items, please submit them and we'll plan accordingly.
Thank you very much. _______________________________________________ server mailing list server@lists.fedoraproject.org
mailto:server@lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:server@lists.fedoraproject.org
mailto:server@lists.fedoraproject.org>
I made the suggestion to publish some sample kickstarts and document their use not long ago, but didn't get much response on the list. Can this be added to the agenda and discussed, please? I would *like* to attend the meeting, but can't make a commitment.
This is certainly a useful idea to suggest to the documentation team. I don't know that there's much to discuss about it on the meeting, unless someone wants to suggest that this is not a good idea.
I don't think we want to be "supporting" any kickstarts, though. Examples are good, but I don't think shipping pre-built kickstarts will be sensible or useful (given that most deployments need to customize anyway). _______________________________________________ server mailing list server@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:server@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/server
Consider this a suggestion *from* the documentation team. Having examples and some documentation on adjusting them was the idea. I thought it would be prudent to keep the working group in the discussion, instead of writing the documentation independently :)
Ah, gotcha. Yes, we will likely generate a few example kickstarts as part of testing this functionality. We should probably make sure that the QA and Docs folks are sharing these between them. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlNeb3MACgkQeiVVYja6o6N65wCeMxHDqb8I1ToCR0ZOgPuviJLt suMAn3vav8KyLuWn8G4P5KSdzENqFJvM =iUPL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________
That's just the kind of thing I was looking for, thanks.
--Pete
2014-04-28 14:41 GMT+02:00 Stephen Gallagher sgallagh@redhat.com:
I expect this to take most of our alotted hour, but if there are other important agenda items, please submit them and we'll plan accordingly.
Adam's test plan perhaps? (I'm afraid I haven't read it yet) Mirek
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
On 04/28/2014 10:57 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
2014-04-28 14:41 GMT+02:00 Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@redhat.com mailto:sgallagh@redhat.com>:
I expect this to take most of our alotted hour, but if there are other important agenda items, please submit them and we'll plan accordingly.
Adam's test plan perhaps? (I'm afraid I haven't read it yet)
Good point. I did read it on Friday and found it to be a sensible 30,000 foot view.
I'll add that to the end of the agenda.
server@lists.fedoraproject.org