test-announce September 2011

test-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org

6 participants
25 discussions

Fedora 16 Beta is GOLD!
by Tim Flink 30 Sep '11

30 Sep '11

At the Fedora 16 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting yesterday, the Fedora 16 Beta release was declared GOLD! Fedora 16 beta will be released on Tuesday, October 4, 2011. Major thanks to everyone who made this happen. There is no way that we could have gotten all this done without everyone's hard work and assistance. Tim Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-09-29/f16_beta_go_no_g… Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-09-29/f16_beta_go_no_g… Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-09-29/f16_beta_go_no_g… ==================================================== #fedora-meeting: F15 Beta Go No Go Meeting Round 2.5 ==================================================== Meeting summary --------------- * Who's Here? (tflink, 21:03:42) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=713564&hide_resolved=1 (adamw, 21:09:08) * why are we here (tflink, 21:09:50) * We're here to see whether or not the beta release criteria have been met (tflink, 21:10:22) * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Beta_Release_Criteria (tflink, 21:10:30) * current release blockers (tflink, 21:10:44) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=713564&hide_resolved=1 (tflink, 21:10:53) * that list doesn't take accepted/proposed into account (tflink, 21:11:02) * (725185) grubby doesn't add the initrd line at the kernel update (tflink, 21:11:57) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725185 (tflink, 21:12:04) * AGREED: - 725185 - RejectedBlocker - This is a problem, but as long as the next kernel update requires this version of grubby, things should be OK and this potential issue can be fixed with an update post-beta. (tflink, 21:20:20) * (731529) grub making uefi calls without aligning stack pointer (tflink, 21:20:39) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731529 (tflink, 21:20:45) * AcceptedBlocker, ON_QA (tflink, 21:21:53) * AGREED: - 731529 - Move to VERIFIED - All of the EFI tests are pretty much working, other issues would have likely surfaced by now (tflink, 21:23:25) * (737731) Bootloader is left in F15 configuration when preupgrading to F16 (tflink, 21:23:49) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737731 (tflink, 21:23:54) * AcceptedBlocker, ASSIGNED (tflink, 21:24:02) * AGREED: - 737731 - This needs to be fixed in F15 PreUpgrade and doesn't affect Beta compose. It doesn't appear to be in progress, need to revisit in the next couple of days. (tflink, 21:26:52) * (739253) unable to shut down from gdm greeter (tflink, 21:27:13) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739253 (tflink, 21:27:19) * AcceptedBlocker, MODIFIED (tflink, 21:27:25) * AGREED: - 739253 - Move to VERIFIED - this has been fixed to the point that we expected - no power option in shell that fails. The power option will be restored in gnome-shell updates (tflink, 21:29:26) * (742207) No usable bootloader option during a text mode f15->f16 upgrade (tflink, 21:30:04) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742207 (tflink, 21:30:12) * Proposed Blocker, NEW (tflink, 21:30:22) * ACTION: adamw or tflink - Document workaround for 742207 (tflink, 21:35:10) * AGREED: - 742207 - RejectedBlocker, CommonBugs - This doesn't directly hit any beta release criterion, isn't the most common upgrade path and can be worked around. The workaround needs to be documented (tflink, 21:35:22) * (742226) /sbin/grub2-probe: error: cannot find a GRUB drive for /dev/mapper/nvidia_cjfffajep2 (tflink, 21:36:37) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742226 (tflink, 21:36:44) * Proposed Blocker, NEW (tflink, 21:36:51) * AGREED: - 742226 - RejectedBlocker CommonBugs- BIOS Raid does work for some controllers but not all. Re-propose as final blocker and document for beta. (tflink, 21:44:21) * Test Coverage (tflink, 21:46:06) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Kickstart_File_Path_Ks_Cfg (adamw, 21:47:27) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Install_to_Hardware_RAID (adamw, 21:47:36) * AGREED: - only one exotic kickstart delivery method is missing from test coverage, and we provisionally suggest the stranger kickstart delivery methods should not be beta critical; therefore deeming test coverage effectively complete, as we would not block even if that test failed (adamw, 21:57:21) * Is Fedora 16 Beta Ready to Go? (tflink, 21:59:12) * QA is go for F16 Beta (tflink, 21:59:48) * RelEng is go (tflink, 22:00:10) * Devel is go (tflink, 22:00:41) * AGREED: - Fedora 16 Beta RC4 is accepted as beta (tflink, 22:01:35) * Open Discussion (tflink, 22:03:25) Meeting ended at 22:04:55 UTC. Action Items ------------ * adamw or tflink - Document workaround for 742207 Action Items, by person ----------------------- * adamw * adamw or tflink - Document workaround for 742207 * tflink * adamw or tflink - Document workaround for 742207 * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * adamw (145) * tflink (101) * nirik (37) * pjones (31) * jsmith (26) * zodbot (5) * jdulaney (4) * dgilmore (4) * Jsmith (3) * smooge (1) * satellit_ (1)

1 0

2011-09-30 @ 17:00 UTC - F16 Final Blocker Bug Review #1
by Tim Flink 30 Sep '11

30 Sep '11

# F16 Final Blocker Review meeting #1 # Date: 2011-09-30 # Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT) # Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net I apologize for the late notice on this - we usually don't start on the blocker review meetings until the week after beta. However, we already have a long list of proposed blockers and it would be nice to not leave them ALL for next week. So, the first Fedora 16 final blocker bug review meeting will be this Friday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll be running through the final blockers and nice-to-haves. An updated list of blocker bugs is available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers. We'll be reviewing the bugs to determine ... 1. Whether they meet the final release criteria [2] and should stay on the list 2. Whether they are getting the attention they need For guidance on Blocker and Nice-to-have (NTH) bugs, refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_nth_bug_process For the blocker review meeting protocol, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting . Thanks, Tim [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Final_Release_Criteria

1 0

F16 Beta Go/No Go Meeting, Round 2.5, + report-out on yesterday's meeting.
by Robyn Bergeron 29 Sep '11

29 Sep '11

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting for the second half of this important meeting. Thanks to the tireless* efforts of our outstanding QA folks, testing on RC4, created late yesterday, has been ongoing all night long. We'll be having the second-and-a-half round of our F16 Beta Go/No-Go TODAY. The first half of this meeting occurred yesterday[1][2], and it was decided that we would make a stretched effort to have another RC including fixes by midnight last night that looked viable, which actually happened. (Had it not been viable, we would have called it No-Go by midnight.) Thursday, September 29, 2011 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT) "Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is called the: Go/No-Go Meeting." "Verifying that the Release criteria are met is the responsibility of the QA Team." For more details about this meeting see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting In the meantime, keep an eye on the Fedora 16 Beta Blocker list: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers -Robyn * Though I know you guys are *very* tired, and your work is MONDO appreciated. [1] Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-09-28/f16_beta_go_no_g… [2] Logs: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-09-28/f16_beta_go_no_g… Meeting Minutes from Go/No-Go Round 2.0: ==================================================== #fedora-meeting: F16 Beta Go No Go Meeting Round two ==================================================== Meeting started by rbergeron at 21:00:24 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-09-28/f16_beta_go_no_g… . Meeting summary --------------- * Who is here? (rbergeron, 21:00:53) * present: jdulaney, nirik, rbergero (rbergeron, 21:01:03) * Why are we here? (rbergeron, 21:01:47) * Dearly beloved, we are gathered here today to see whether or not the beta release criteria have been met. (rbergeron, 21:02:28) * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Beta_Release_Criteria (rbergeron, 21:02:43) * Current release blockers (rbergeron, 21:05:29) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers (rbergeron, 21:05:38) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=727522 (adamw, 21:08:57) * AGREED: 727522 is really fixed, the apparent rc2/rc3 reproducers were pilot error (adamw, 21:11:50) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737731 (adamw, 21:11:53) * 737731 doesn't block f16 image creation, will get fixed by an F15 update. (rbergeron, 21:13:06) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741655 (adamw, 21:13:45) * AGREED: 741655 is not a beta blocker as it's a crazy custom partition layout, moved to final (adamw, 21:15:51) * http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741781 (adamw, 21:16:14) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741781#c19 provides an explanation of the two bugs, if you want a quickish catch-up (adamw, 21:18:29) * AGREED: If we have a built anaconda and RC4 by midnight pacific tonight, opt to do go/no-go tomorrow. Otherwise, slip one week. (rbergeron, 21:37:28) * if we don't have what is needed by midnight pacific, Robyn will send out the No-Go Mail. (rbergeron, 21:39:32) * ACTION: nirik will be coordinating the RC; he needs to be told when anaconda/grub is ready. (rbergeron, 21:39:48) * For status updates/questions, please check in #fedora-qa (rbergeron, 21:41:42) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=741817 (adamw, 21:43:10) * AGREED: 741817 not a blocker as long as it leaves f15 install bootable, adamw will check that (adamw, 21:53:56) * Re-No/Go Meeting time (rbergeron, 21:54:13) * AGREED: will meet tomorrow, same bat time, same bat channel, to do final go/no-go decision. (rbergeron, 21:56:32) * robyn will be out tomorrow (rbergeron, 21:56:44) Meeting ended at 21:58:19 UTC. Action Items ------------ * nirik will be coordinating the RC; he needs to be told when anaconda/grub is ready. Action Items, by person ----------------------- * nirik * nirik will be coordinating the RC; he needs to be told when anaconda/grub is ready. * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * rbergeron (142) * adamw (125) * jdulaney (28) * nirik (27) * dgilmore (26) * jsmith (24) * pjones (11) * VileGent (4) * zodbot (4) * tflink (3) * hno (3) * brunowolff (1) * tk009 (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 4 (RC4) Available Now!
by Andre Robatino 28 Sep '11

28 Sep '11

As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 4 (RC4) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. The priority in RC4 testing is to complete the installation tests. We must complete these by 14:00 EDT on Thursday 2011-09-29 in order to avoid slipping the Beta release again. The Base and Desktop results can be inherited from RC3, so they are not as important as the Installation tests. The only changes from RC3 to RC4 are new builds of anaconda and grub which together should fix EFI installations. If you wish to test EFI installation, please use the DVD or netinst images: the live images are not EFI-enabled. If you use the netinst image, for now, please add this repository: http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/repo_grub/x86_64 to get the fixed grub package included in the installed system. It should arrive in updates-testing quite soon, but until then, you'll need the extra repository. When doing an EFI install you'll get a warning about grub and grub2 conflicting; don't worry about this, you can proceed safely and the install should succeed. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Security Lab: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Security_Lab_Test Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [7], or on the test list [8]. Create Fedora 16 Beta release candidate (RC) - live and traditional https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4923 F16 Beta Blocker tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=713564 F16 Beta Nice-To-Have tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=713565 [1] http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-16/f-16-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Security_Lab_validation_testing [6] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Beta_Release_Criteria [7] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [8] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

1 0

All hands on deck: F16 Beta RC4 impending
by Adam Williamson 28 Sep '11

28 Sep '11

Hey, folks. So, everyone clear their schedules for the next 18 hours! We have, we think, fixed up all the EFI installation issues. At the go/no-go meeting today, all groups agreed to delay the go/no-go decision till tomorrow evening (Eastern time) to give a chance at getting RC4 built and validated and hence avoiding a further slip of the release, which we really didn't want to do. RC4 should be landing within the next few hours, unless something goes terribly wrong. At that point, because the fixes involved poking anaconda, we're going to need to try and re-do the entire set of install validation tests, if at all possible. Desktop and base do not really need to be re-tested, as they won't have changed at all from RC3. I'm gonna be testing the whole time from when RC4 lands to the deadline, but if everyone else can please pitch and complete some of the install tests that would be really helpful. It would especially help if people can help test the slightly odd hardware cases, like all the RAID permutations, and SCSI and PATA installs. We can try to co-ordinate testing through #fedora-qa, I'll be there the whole time, to try and make sure people don't test the same things (which is usually great, but for this we should just focus on making sure everything gets tested at least once). Thanks a lot everyone! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net

1 0

F16 Beta Go/No Go Meeting, Round 2.
by Robyn Bergeron 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

Join us on irc.freenode.net #fedora-meeting for this important meeting. Wednesday, September 28, 2011 @21:00 UTC (17:00 EDT/14:00 PDT) "Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if the release criteria are met for a particular release. This meeting is called the: Go/No-Go Meeting." "Verifying that the Release criteria are met is the responsibility of the QA Team." For more details about this meeting see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting In the meantime, keep an eye on the Fedora 16 Beta Blocker list: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Current_Release_Blockers -Robyn

1 0

Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 3 (RC3) Available Now!
by Andre Robatino 27 Sep '11

27 Sep '11

As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 3 (RC3) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. In general, official live images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below for updates. When they appear, the download directory should be the same as that for install images, except with the trailing "/Fedora/" replaced by "/Live/". Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Security Lab: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Security_Lab_Test Ideally, all Alpha and Beta priority test cases for Installation [2], Base [3], Desktop [4], and Security Lab [5] should pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [6]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [7], or on the test list [8]. Create Fedora 16 Beta release candidate (RC) - live and traditional https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4923 F16 Beta Blocker tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=713564 F16 Beta Nice-To-Have tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=713565 [1] http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-16/f-16-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Security_Lab_validation_testing [6] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Beta_Release_Criteria [7] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [8] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

1 0

ABRT Test Day today/tomorrow - 2011-09-26!
by Adam Williamson 26 Sep '11

26 Sep '11

Hey, everyone, while we're still busy validating Beta, there's a Test Day going on today/tomorrow, Monday 2011-09-26, too: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-09-26_ABRT Looking at ABRT, and particularly its integration with libreport (which some of you may remember has caused a few problems already this cycle!) As always, the event is in #fedora-test-day in Freenode IRC, and all the test instructions are on the Wiki. There should be a good turnout of developers, so it's a great chance to help shake out any remaining abrt bugs for Fedora 16. Please help out if you have a chance! Thanks. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net

1 0

Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 2 (RC2) Available Now!
by Andre Robatino 23 Sep '11

23 Sep '11

As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 2 (RC2) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. In general, official live images arrive a few hours after the install images: see the links below for updates. When they appear, the download directory should be the same as that for install images, except with the trailing "/Fedora/" replaced by "/Live/". Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Security Lab: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Security_Lab_Test Ideally, all Alpha and Beta priority test cases for Installation [2], Base [3], Desktop [4], and Security Lab [5] should pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [6]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [7], or on the test list [8]. Create Fedora 16 Beta release candidate (RC) - live and traditional https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4923 F16 Beta Blocker tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=713564 F16 Beta Nice-To-Have tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=713565 [1] http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-16/f-16-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Security_Lab_validation_testing [6] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_16_Beta_Release_Criteria [7] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [8] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

1 0

Testing requested: proposed fixes for #738964 (bootloader install issues)
by Adam Williamson 23 Sep '11

23 Sep '11

Hey, folks. So, as most of you probably know, one of the big bugs that's been holding up the Beta is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=738964 - various issues related to bootloader installation with the wrinkles of grub2 and GPT disk labels. There are now not one but *two* updates images with test fixes for the bugs: http://dlehman.fedorapeople.org/updates-738964.6.img http://dlehman.fedorapeople.org/updates-738964.6-nohammer.img The second one improves the anaconda code which excludes the device anaconda is being installed from (particularly if it's a USB stick) from consideration as an install or bootloader target device, and also tries much harder to honor the user's choice of the device where the bootloader should be installed on all the non-custom-partitioning paths. Just these two fixes should address the most urgent cases of this bug. The first one also tries to create a BIOS boot partition on any GPT labelled disk present - whether formatted by anaconda or not - which has enough free space and which does not currently have one, if the system is BIOS-based. This should act as a 'big hammer' to make sure you can pretty much always install the bootloader wherever you like, but obviously it's a pretty big and possibly problematic change. We really need testing with both images, to establish a couple of things: 1) if you've had problems with the bootloader installing somewhere you didn't expect in Beta RC1 and previous builds, please test whether your issue is fixed (it's best if you can test with each updates.img and report on both, but if you can only test one, that's fine too) 2) if either image has bugs that don't exist in Beta RC1: as much testing as possible, with any kind of installation, is useful here. Just try an install with either updates.img, and if you hit a problem, confirm that it doesn't exist in Beta RC1, and add a comment to 738964. Particularly interesting configurations would be installing to a system which already has one completely full GPT-labelled disk that you choose not to reformat, installing to a system with an existing GPT-labelled disk with a BIOS boot partition that you choose not to reformat, installing to a system with an existing GPT-labelled disk *without* a BIOS boot partition that you choose not to reformat, and any kind of installation at all with multiple disks (hard disks or USB sticks) connected during install - no matter which of the disks you choose to use or not use, and installs from both DVD and live written to a USB stick. Note that we expect the -nohammer version to still be 'buggy' in the case where you choose manual partitioning with multiple disks present and do not create a BIOS boot partition on the target disk; it won't create one for you or require you to create one, and when you get to the bootloader location choice (which comes later in custom partitioning than in other paths), the target drive's MBR will not be an available install location. The 'hammer' version should 'fix' this case. To use an updates.img, just pass the updates= parameter to the kernel when booting. So boot with Beta RC1, hit 'tab' at the bootloader screen, and type 'updates=http://dlehman.fedorapeople.org/updates-738964.6.img' or 'updates=http://dlehman.fedorapeople.org/updates-738964.6-nohammer.img' and then proceed to install as normal. This works for both the regular and live installers. Thanks everyone! We really need to get testing data in and do an anaconda build today so we can get RC2 out tonight. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net

1 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

test-announce September 2011